Isha Jaswal, Dr., Department of Law, Delhi Metropolitan Education (GGSIP), India
Badri Narayanan, Economist, University of Washington Seattle, USA
Pluri-lateral trade agreements have been the topic of the hour in trade circles, since late 2000’s, though they have been slowed down in recent trade policy developments in UK and USA. However, countries like India and African nations that have been left out of such mega deals have been considering striking deals among themselves. In this paper, we examine the potential impact of India-SADC (South African Development Community) FTA on these countries, especially focusing on their crucial Textiles and Clothing (T&C) sectors. Apart from the widely used GTAP framework, we also employ the Revealed Comparative Advantage (RCA) analysis in conjunction with it, to draw implications on FTA impct on RCA, which is mostly positive as per our analysis. Otherwise, India stands to gain, while the SADC countries have mixed effects across sectors, with an overall positive effects.
Keywords: trade policy, free trade agreement, computable general equilibrium, textile and clothing.
JEL Classification: F13, F15, D58.
Cite as: Jaswal, I., Narayanan, B. (2017). Trade impact of SADC-India FTA on textiles and clothing sectors. Business Ethics and Leadership, 1(2), 20-30. Doi: 10.21272/bel.1(2).20-30.2017
- Chemengich, Margaret (2010). Competitiveness of the SSA Textile Sector vs Asian LDC Countries. African Cotton and Textile Industries Federation (ACTIF).
- Ernst, Christoph, A. Hernandez Ferrer, and Daan Zult (2005). The end of the Multi-Fibre Arrangement and its implication for trade and employment. ILO Employment Strategy Paper, 16.
- Fontaine, Thomson (July, 2007). End of Quotas Hits African Textiles, in IMF Survey.
- Goto, Junichi (1989). The multifibre arrangement and its effects on developing countries. The World Bank Research Observer, 4(2), 203-227.
- Kaplinsky, Raphael, and Mike Morris (2008). Do the Asian drivers undermine export-oriented industrialization in SSA? World Development, 36(2), 254-273.
- Kaplinsky, Raphael, and Mike Morris (2009). The Asian drivers and SSA: MFA quota removal and the portents for African industrialisation.
- Keane, J., & teVelde, D.W. (2008). The role of textile and clothing industries in growth and development strategies. Overseas Development Institute. Retrieved from www.odi.org.uk/resources/docs/3361.pdf (Accessed June 28, 2013).
- Naumann, Eckart (2006). The Multifibre Agreement – WTO Agreement on Textiles and Clothing. Tralac Working Paper, 4.
- Nordås, Hildegunn Kyvik (2004). The global textile and clothing industry post the agreement on textiles and clothing. World, 7, 1-000.
- Platzer, M.D. (2013). US Textile Manufacturing and the Trans-Pacific Partnership Negotiations.
- Rahman, M. (2014). Trade Benefits for Least Developed Countries: the Bangladesh Case Market Access Initiatives, Limitations and Policy Recommendations. United Nations, Department of Economics and Social Affairs.
- Srinivasan, T.N. (1996). Post-Uruguay Round Issues for Asian Developing Countries. Asian Development Review, 14, 1-43.
- Textile Federation of the South African Textile Industry. Retrieved from http://www.texfed.co.za/.
- The Textiles industry in the United States. Retrieved from http://selectusa.commerce.gov/industry-snapshots/textile-industry-united-states. (Accessed on January 22, 2016).
- Wohn, Alice J.H. (2001). Towards GATT Integration: Circumventing Quantitative Restrictions on Textiles and Apparel Trade Under the Multi-Fiber Arrangement, University of Pennsylvania Journal of International Law, 22, p. 375.
- Yang, Y., & Zhong, C. (1998). China’s textile and clothing exports in a changing world economy. The Developing Economies, 36(1), 19-22.