Abstract

Corporate social responsibility plays a high-profile role in today’s competitive market and any unethical behavior done by a corporate leads to objectionable consequences. These consequences often have influence on businesses activity in a negative way. The purpose of this study is to examine the relationship between the social responsibility of an organization and three variables: the stock market of the organization, the financial performance of the organization, and the reputation index by the organization set during the scandal.

The study was carried out on the latest corporate social responsibility related scandal escalated in the Volkswagen corporation, known as “Diesel gate” or the emission scandal. While other authors have analyzed this scandal by focusing on one variable, we concentrated on integrating the general picture of key issues. By studying the quantitative data from 2013 to 2016, the research evidenced that unethical behavior of well prominent company unfold negative effect on the corporate’s stock price, financial performance and reputation as well.

Keywords: scandal, Volkswagen, Corporate Social Responsibility, Diesel gate.

JEL Classification: E71.

Cite as: Mačaitytė, I., Virbašiūtė, G. (2018). Volkswagen Emission Scandal and Corporate Social Responsibility – A Case Study. Business Ethics and Leadership, 2(1), 6-13. Doi: 10.21272/bel.2(1).6-13.2018

References

1. Atiyeh, C. (2017). Everything you need to know about the VW Diesel-Emissions Scandal. Resource document.https://blog.caranddriver.com/everything-you-need-to-know-about-the-vw-diesel-emissionsscandal/. Accessed 10 November.
2. Barnett, M. L. (2007). Stakeholder influence capacity and the variability of financial returns to corporate social responsibility. Academy of Management Review, 32(3), 796 p.
3. Boston, W. (2017). VW sales rise in 2016 despite the scandal. Resource document. https://www.marketwatch.com/story/volkswagen-sales-rise-in-2016-despite-scandal-2017-01-09F. Accessed 11 November 2017.
4. Catherine, J., Sanker, S., & CB, B. (2014). Corporate crises in the age of corporate social responsibility. Business Horizons, no. (3).
5. Chatterji, A., & Listokin, S. (2007). Corporate social irresponsibility. Democracy Journal, pp. 52-63.
6. CNBC, 2017. VW takes new $3 billion hit over diesel emissions scandal. Resource document. https://www.cnbc.com/2017/09/29/vw-takes-new-3-billion-hit-over-diesel-emissions-scandal.html. Accessed document 12 November 2017.
7. Demandt, B. (2017). Volkswagen. Resource document. http://carsalesbase.com/european-car-salesdata/volkswagen/. Accessed 11 November 2017.
8. European Commision. (2017). Corporate Social Responsibility. Resource document. https://ec.europa.eu/growth/industry/corporate-social-responsibility_en. Accessed 10 November 2017.
9. FTSE Russell. FTSE4Good Index Series. Resource document. http://www.ftse.com/products/indices/FTSE4Good. Accessed 12 November.
10. Hull, R. (2015). German vehicle regulator broadens investigation: 23 carmakers including BMW, Ford, Mercedes and Toyota being tested. Resource document. http://www.thisismoney.co.uk/money/cars/article3315123/23-carmakers-including-BMW-Ford-Toyota-emissions-tested-watchdog.html. Accessed 11 November 2017.
11. Interbrand. Methodology. Resource document. http://interbrand.com/best-brands/best-globalbrands/methodology/. Accessed 12 November.
12. Mocciaro, Li Destri A. (2013). Managerial irresponsibility and firm survival. Pivoting the company in the aftermath of a social scandal, Franco Angeli, Milano.
13. Ranking The Brands, (2017). Rankings per brand. Resoursce document. https://www.rankingthebrands.com/Brand-detail.aspx?brandID=189. Accessed 11 November 2017.
14. Reputation institute. About RepTrak. The gold standard for reputation measurement. Resource document. https://www.reputationinstitute.com/reputation-measurement-services/reptrak-framework. Accessed 12 November.
15. Volkswagen Annual Report (2009). Strategy 2018. Resource document. http://annualreport2009.volkswagenag.com/servicepages/search.php?q=strategy+2018&pageID=33738&ca t=b. Accessed 10 November 2017.
16. Weber, M. (2008). The business case for corporate social responsibility. European Management Journal, 26(4), 247-261.
17. Xueming, L., & Bhattacharya, C. (2006, October). Corporate Social Responsibility, Customer Satisfaction, and Market Value. Journal of Marketing, 70(4), 1-18.