Abstract

Both Confucianism and Islam offer a humanistic approach towards the concept of leadership, emphasizing ethical practices such as integrity, trust, moral characters, and justice. These philosophies and religions are perceived as a means of providing moral values and countering the negativity associated with modernity. They provide the cultural and moral capital to university leaders, which affect leadership practices and organizational cultures of private higher education institutions in Asia. Leaders are expected to maintain a high level of integrity and responsibility. University leaders and administrators are often guided by their respect for cultural traditions and this study helps to provide an understanding of higher education leadership in the selected three countries. This article offers a comprehensive view of excellence in higher education ranging from policies to practices of university leaders and academics, based on previous and current works of the author. Subsequently, the findings provide the basis for developing a humanistic multidimensional model for higher education excellence, embedding the principles of Confucianism and Islam, The rigor and richness of the findings will contribute to the development of higher education leadership in Asia. This paper draws upon the findings of the previous works of the author and gives them new perspectives from the Confucian and Islamic viewpoints.

Keywords: Confucianism, Islam, higher education excellence.

JEL Classification: I23, Z12.

Cite as: Yu Sing Ong (2018). A Humanistic Model for the Higher Education Excellence: Embedding Confucianism and Islamic Principles. Business Ethics and Leadership, 2(3), 103-122. DOI: 10.21272/bel.2(3).103-122.2018

References

1. Ali-Choudhury, R., Bennett, R., & Savani, S. (2009). University marketing directors’ view on the components of a university brand. International Review on Public and Nonprofit Marketing, 6(1), 11-33.
2. Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York: W. H. Freeman.
3. Barsh, J.C., Capozzi, M.M. & Davidson, J. (2008). Leadership and innovation. The McKinsey Quarterly, No.1, New York.
4. Beck, L.G., and Murphy, J. (1994). Ethics in education leadership prograns: An expanding role. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
5. Bizumic, B., Smithson, M., & Van Rooy, D. (2010). Reconceptualized ethnocentrism and its consequences. Paper presented at the Thirty-Third Annual Scientific Meeting of the International Society of Political Psychology in San Francisco, CA, USA.
6. Carver, F. D., & Sergiovanni, T. J. (1971). Complexity, adaptability, and job satisfaction in high schools: An axiomatic theory applied. Journal of Educational Administration, 9(1), 10-31.
7. Chan, S.J. and Yang, C.Y. (2017). Governance styles in Taiwanese universities: Features and Effects. International Journal of Education Development, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijedudev.2017.10.007.
8. Chin, T. (2013). How ethical leadership encourages employee voice behavior in china: The mediating role of organizational harmony. International Business Research, 6(10), 15–24. doi:10.5539/ibr.v6n10p15.
9. Clark, B.R. (1983). The Higher Education System: Academic Organization in Cross National Perspective. University of California Press, Berkeley.
10. Crotty, M. (1998). The foundations of social research: Meaning and perspective in the research process. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
11. Frances, R., & Lebras, C. (1982). The prediction of job satisfaction. International Review of Applied Psychology, 31, 391-410.
12. Frankel, J.R., & Wallen, N.E. (2003). How to design and evaluate research in education. Boston, MA. McGraw-Hill.
13. Fu, J. (2013). Comparative Study on Presidents’ Tenure between National University of Modern China and Private University, Meitan Higher Education, 31(1), 47-50.
14. Goleman, D. (1998). Working with emotional intelligence. New York: Batam Books.
15. Guo, J., and Xiong, S. (2010). An empirical study of research performance evaluation for Chinese universities of 31 areas. Journal of Intelligence, 29(9), 83-88.
16. Gray, B.J., Fam, K.S. & Lalnes, V.A. (2003). Branding universities in Asian markets. Journal of Product & Brand Management, 12(2), 108-120.
17. Grix, J. (2002). Introducing Students to the Generic Terminology of Social Research. Politics, 22(3), 175-186.
18. Hall, Edward, T. (1976). Beyond Culture. NY: Anchor Books.
19. Halstead, J.M. (2004).An Islamic Concept of Education. Comparative Education, 40(4), 517-529.
20. Hashim, R (2012). Muslim private higher educational institutions in Malaysia: issues and challenges. Islam and Civilisational Renewal, 3(3), 474-488.
21. Huang, F. (2006), Incorporation and University Governance: A Comparative Perspective from China and Japan, Higher Education Management and Policy, 18(2). Available at: https://doi.org/10.1787/hemp-v18-art10-en.
22. Li, Y., Xu, J., Tu, Y., & Lu, X. (2014). Ethical leadership and subordinates’ occupational well-being: A multi-level examination in China. Social Indicators Research, 116(3), 823–842. doi:10.1007/s11205-013-0321-z.
23. Lu, Y. (2016). Academic Leadership: A logical starting point for reconstructing the modern university governance system. Higher Education Exploration, 6, 34-38.
24. Lu, C. S., & Lin, C. C. (2014). The effect of ethical leadership and ethical climate on employee ethical behavior in the international port context, Journal of Business Ethics, 124, 209–223.
25. Maslow, A. H. (1954). Motivation and personality. New York: Harper & Brothers.
26. Merriam, S.B. (1998). Qualitative research and case study applications in education. San Francisco, CA: Josey-Bass.
27. Mohr, J.S. (2010). Marketing of high-technology products and innovations (3rd ed). Upper Saddle River, New Jersey, US: Pearson.
28. Mok, K.H. and Chan, Y. (2008). International Benchmarking with the best universities: Policy and practice in mainland China and Taiwan. Higher Education Policy, 21, 469-486.
29. O’Neil, J. (1996). On emotional intelligence: A conversation with Daniel Goleman. Educational Leadership, 54(1), 6-11.
30. Ogawa, R.., & Bossert, S. (1995). Leadership as an organizational quality. Educational Administration Quarterly, 31, 224-243.
31. Perkins, D. (1995). Outsmarting I.Q: The emerging science of learnable intelligence. New York: The Free Press.
32. Pring, R. (2000). Philosophy of Education Research. London: Continuum.
33. Rowe, K.J., & Rowe, K.S. (1999). Investigating the relationship between students’ attentive-inattentive behaviors in the classroom and their literacy progress. International Journal of Educational Research, 31, 1-138.
34. Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2017). Self-determination theory: Basic psychological needs in motivation, development, and wellness. New York: Guilford Publishing.
35. Ryan, J. & Louie, K. (2007). False dichotomy?: ‘Western’ and ‘Eastern’ concepts of scholarship and learning. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 39(4), 404-417.
36. Salopek, J.J. (1998). Train your brain. Training and Development, 52(10), 26-33.
37. Sashkin, M., & Walberg, H. J. (1993). Educational leadership and school culture. Berkeley, CA: McCutchan Publishing Corporation.
38. Silverman, D. (2000). Doing qualitative research: A practical handbook. London: Sage.
39. Sun, Q. (2008). Confucian educational philosophy and its implication for lifelong learning and lifelong education. International Journal of Lifelong Education, 27(5), 559–578. doi:10.1080/01411920802343269.
40. Sweeney, J. (1981). Teacher dissatisfaction on the rise: Higher-level needs unfulfilled. Education, 102, 203-207.
41. Tan, C. and Ibrahim, A. (2017). Humanism, Islamic Education and Confucian Education, Religious Education, 112(4), 394-406.
42. Trusty, F. M., & Sergiovanni, T. J. (1966). Perceived need deficiencies of teachers and administrators: A proposal for restructuring teacher roles. Educational Administration Quarterly, 2, 168-180.
43. Warrick, D. (2017). The urgent need to educate present and future leaders in organizational development and change. Organizational Development Practitioner, 49(3), 52-58.
44. Xu, K. and Wang, G. (2018). Confucianism: The question of its religiousness and its role in constructing chinese secular ideology. Journal for the Study of Religions and Ideologies, 17(50), 79-95.
45. Yu, S.O. (2016). Reexamining Education Research Methodologies – Collaborative rather than Competitive. Bulgarian Journal of Science and Education Policy, 10(1), 124-141.
46. Yu, S.O. (2016). Need for Regulatory Revamp of Private Institutions. Perspectives of Innovation, Economics & Business, 16(1), 55-78.
47. Yu, S.O. (2016). Using students’ feedback to evaluate teachers’ effectiveness. Journal for Educators, Teachers and Trainers, 7(1), 182-192.
48. Yu, S.O. (2016). Reculturing: The key to sustainability of private universities. International Journal of Teaching and Education, 4(4), 88-105. doi:10.20472/TE.2016.4.4.005.
49. Yu, S.O. (2016). Remodeling the University as an Institution of Choice. International Journal of Development Research, 6(5), 7846-7852.
50. Yu, S.O. (2012). Complexities of multiple paradigms in higher education leadership today. Journal of Global Management, 4(1), 92-100.
51. Zaid, M. and Tamkin, B. (2013). Muslim Consumer Behavior: Emphasis on Ethics from Islamic Perspective. Middle-East Journal of Scientific Research, 18(9), 1301-1307.
52. Zhang, S., & Tu, Y. (2016). Cross-domain effects of ethical leadership on employee family and life satisfaction: The moderating role of family-supportive supervisor behaviors. Journal of Business Ethics, 1–13. doi:10.1007/s10551-016-3306-4.