He Shuquan, ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4159-4365
PhD, Professor, Department of Economics, Shanghai University, China
This paper summarizes the arguments and counterarguments within the scientific discussion on the issue of the environmental impact of trade liberalization in the business ethics perspective. The main purpose of the research is to estimate different effects of trade on environment performance, namely the scale effect, technique effect, and trade-induced composition effects. Systematization literary sources and approaches for solving the problem of trade and environment indicate that they ignored country-specific factors and different economic development stages. The relevance of the decision of this scientific problem is that the research will provide profound insights on the impact of freer trade on the environment. Investigation of trade and environment performance in this paper is carried out in the following logical sequence: literature review, model specification, empirical estimation, and discussion. Methodological tools of the research are panel regression of data at the provincial level over the time period from 1997 to 2008. The object of research is China because China has experiences of fast development in trade. The paper presents the results of an empirical analysis by panel regression techniques for the estimation, which shows that trade itself has significantly positive effects on the environment. The research empirically confirms and theoretically proves that the impacts of trade liberalization on environment performance differ from pollutant to pollutant, and it rather depends upon the specific indicator in question. The results of the research can be useful for a number of policy implications for China as well as other developing economies in terms of business ethics.
Keywords: trade liberalization, China, environmental quality, business ethics.
JEL Classification: F1, Q5, Q56, M1, M2.
Cite as: He, Shuquan (2019). The Impact of Trade on Environmental Quality: A Business Ethics Perspective and Evidence from China. Business Ethics and Leadership, 3(4), 43-48. http://doi.org/10.21272/bel.3(4).43-48.2019.
- Antweiler, Werner, Copeland, Brian, R., Taylor, M. Scott (2001). Is free trade good for the environment? American Economic Review, 91(4), 877-908. DOI: 10.3386/w6707.
- Chai, Joseph, C. H. (2002). Trade and Environment: Evidence from China’s Manufacturing Sector. Sustainable Development, 10(1), 25-35. DOI: 10.1002/sd.174.
- Chua, S. (1999). Economic Growth, Liberalization and the Environment: A Review of the Economic Evidence. Annual Review of Energy and Environment, 24, 391-430. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.energy.24.1.391.
- Cole, Matthew, A., Elliott, Robert, J.R. (2003). Determining the trade environment composition effect: the role of capital, labor, and environmental regulations. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 46(3), 363-383. DOI: 10.1016/S0095-0696(03)00021-4.
- Copeland, B. (2011). Trade and the Environment. In Bernhofen., Daniel, Falvey, R., Greenaway, D., and Kreickemeier, U., editors, Palgrave Handbook of International Trade, chapter 15. Palgrave Macmillan, Bastingstoke.
- Dean, Judith, M. (2002). Does trade liberalization harm the environment? A new test. Canadian Journal of Economics, 35(4), 819-842. https://doi.org/10.1111/0008-4085.00155.
- Dean, J. M. and Lovely, M. E. (2010). Trade growth, production fragmentation, and China’s environment. In Feenstra, R. C. and Wei, S.-J., editors, China’s Growing Role in World Trade, pages 429-469. University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
- Eisenbarth, Sabrina (2017). Is Chinese trade policy motivated by environmental concerns? Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 82, 74-103. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeem.2016.10.001.
- Feridun, Mete, and Jean, Balouga (2006). Impact of Trade Liberalization on the Environment in Developing Countries: The Case of Nigeria. Journal of Developing Societies, 22(731). DOI: 10.1177/0169796X06062965.
- Frankel, Jeffrey, A., Rose, Andrew, K. (2005). Is trade good or bad for the environment? Sorting out the causality. Review of Economics and Statistics, 87(1), 85-91. DOI: 10.3386/w9201.
- Garsous, G. (2019). Trends in policy indicators on trade and environment, OECD Trade and Environment Working Papers, No. 2019/01, OECD Publishing, Paris, https://doi.org/10.1787/b8d2bcac-en.
- Grossman, Gene, M., Krueger, Alan, B. (1995). Economic Growth and the Environment. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 110(2), 353-377. https://doi.org/10.2307/2118443.
- Grossman, Gene, M., Krueger, Alan, B. (1993). Environmental Impacts of a North American Free Trade Agreement. In: Garber P (ed) The U.S.-Mexico Free Trade Agreement. Cambridge MA, MIT Press.
- Grossman, Gene, M., Krueger, Alan, B. (1991). Environmental impacts of a North American free trade agreement. NBER Working Paper No. 3914.
- Jalil, Abdul and Syed, F. Mahmud (2009). Environment Kuznets curve for CO2 emissions: A cointegration analysis for China. Energy Policy, 37(12), 5167-5172. DOI: 10.1016/j.enpol.2009.07.044.
- Jayadevappa, Ravishankar and Sumedha, Chhatre (2000). International trade and environmental quality: a survey. Ecological Economics, 32(2), 175-194. DOI: 10.1016/S0921-8009(99)00094-4.
- Jena, Pradyot Ranjan and Ulrike, Grote (2008). Growth–trade–environment nexus in India. Economics Bulletin, 17(11), 1-11.
- Kellenberg, Derek, K. (2009). An empirical investigation of the pollution haven effect with strategic environment and trade policy. Journal of International Economics, 78(2), 242-255. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jinteco.2009.04.004.
- Khalil, Samina and Zeeshan, Inam (2006). Is Trade Good for Environment? A Unit Root Cointegration Analysis. The Pakistan Development Review, 45: 4 Part II (Winter 2006), 1187-1196.
- Managi, Shunsuke, AkiraHibiki and Tetsuya, Tsurumi (2009). Does trade openness improve environmental quality? Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 58(3), 346-363. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeem.2009.04.008.
- WTO (2014). WTO rules and environmental policies: GATT exceptions. Available online at http://www.wto.org/english/tratop_e/envir_e/envt_rules_exceptions_e.htm, accessed on December 11, 2014.