Abstract

The concept of ethical consumption has garnered considerable attention in recent years. Yet, it remains somewhat ‘mystical’ in the existing Western literature. The present unique cross-cultural and cross-disciplinary study offers clarification on the conception of ethical consumption from three aspects: First, this paper reflects on the nature of the concept of ethical consumption and identifies its relatively large common core as an open-textured, ‘naturalistic’ concept; conceptualizing the ideal of ethical consumption in virtue ethical language. Second, this paper secures a firmer grounding for the concept of ‘ethical consumption’ within virtue ethics by linking it theoretically to a Confucian form of virtue ethics. We support this interpretation with empirical evidence, gleaned through focus-group discussions and individual interviews with consumers, undergoing fast-changing dynamics, from an urban-rural fringe from China: a culture already immersed in lay virtue ethical thinking, inspired by Confucius. Third, the paper brings the data back to theory by eliciting from the data a structural framework of the foci of the underlying virtues making up the virtue of ethical consumption, on our respondents’ understanding, and reflecting upon how this new theoretical understanding may advance the academic discourse on ethical consumption and expand the understandings of ethical consumption from a cross-cultural perspective. We explore notions such as virtue patriotism and filial piety that contribute to the diversity of the conception of ethical consumption. We explain how those virtues play a role in Chinese understandings of ethical consumption, contributing to the global diversity of the concept. This study does not claim to represent the complete truth about Chinese consumers’ views on ethical consumption, considering the geographic constraints and the small number of participants. However, it does offer some salient insights into Chinese consumers’ understanding of ethical consumption, which is grounded in their daily practices and reflects their consumer motivations; hence, enriching the global business ethics discourse on ethical consumption.

Keywords: Virtues, The Concept of Ethical Consumption, Ethical Theories and Philosophies, Chinese Consumers, Confucian Virtue Ethics.

JEL Classification: D11, N3, P46.

Cite as: Huo, Y., Kristjánsson, K. (2020). An Explorative Study of Virtues in Ethical Consumption from a Confucian Perspective in an Urban-Rural-Fringe in China. Business Ethics and Leadership, 4(4), 105-122. https://doi.org/10.21272/bel.4(4).105-122.2020

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License

References

1. Abdur, R.M., and Hwee, T.P. (2002). Ethics and purchasing dilemma: A Singaporean view. Journal of Business Ethics, 35(4), 307-326. DOI:10.1023/A:1013853021571.
2. Ackerman, D., Hu, J., and Wei, L. (2009). Confucius, cars, and big government: Impact of government involvement in business on consumer perceptions under Confucianism. Journal of Business Ethics, 88(3), 473-482. DOI:10.2307/27749720.
3. Allon, F. (2011). Ethical consumption begins at home: Green renovations, eco-homes and sustainable home improvement. In T. Lewis and E. Potter (Eds.), Ethical consumption: A critical introduction (pp.202-215). New York: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203867785.
4. Alzola, M. (2015). Virtuous persons and virtuous actions in business ethics and organizational research. Business Ethics Quarterly, 25(3), 287-318. DOI:10.1017/beq.2015.24.
5. Alzola, M., Hennig, A., and Romar, E. (2020). Thematic symposium editorial: Virtue ethics between East and West. Journal of Business Ethics, in press. Retrieved from https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007%2Fs10551-019-04317-2.
6. Barnett, C. Cafaro, P., and Newholm, T. (2005). Philosophy and ethical consumption. In R. Harrison, T. Newholm, D. Shaw (Eds.): The ethical consumer (pp.11-24). London: Sage. Available at: https://www.escholar.manchester.ac.uk/uk-ac-man-scw:4b2293.
7. Braun, V., and Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77-101. DOI:10.1191/1478088706qp063oa.
8. Bray J., Johns N., and Kilburn D. (2010). An exploratory study into the factors impeding ethical consumption. Journal of Business Ethics, 98(4), 597-608. DOI:10.1007/s10551-010-0640-9.
9. Burke, S.J., Milberg, S.J., and Smith, N.C. (1993). The role of ethical concerns in consumer purchase behavior: Understanding alternative processes. Advances in Consumer Research, 20(1), 119-122. DOI:10.1016/0361-3682(93)90026-3.
10. Carrigan, M., and Attalla, A. (2001). The myth of the ethical consumer: Do ethics matter in purchase behaviour? Journal of Consumer Marketing, 18(7), 560-577. DOI:10.1108/07363760110410263.
11. Chen, Y., and Moosmayer, D.C. (2020). When guilt is not enough: Interdependent self-construal as moderator of the relationship between guilt and ethical consumption in a Confucian context. Journal of Business Ethics, 161(3), 551-572. DOI:10.1007/s10551-018-3831-4.
12. Cherrier, H. (2005). Using existential-phenomenological interviewing to explore meanings of consumption. In R. Harrison, T. Newholm, and D. Shaw (Eds.), The ethical consumer (pp. 125-135). London: Sage. Available at: https://www.escholar.manchester.ac.uk/uk-ac-man-scw:4b2293.
13. Chesterley, N. (2016). Virtue and vice with endogenous preferences. Economic Theory Bulletin, 4(2), 199-211. DOI:10.1007/s40505-015-0078-4.
14. Chu, I., and Moore, G. (2019). From harmony to conflict: MacIntyrean virtue ethics in a Confucian tradition. Journal of Business Ethics, in press. Available at: https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007%2Fs10551-019-04305-6#citeas.
15. Clandinin, D.J., and Huber, J. (2007). Narrative inquiry. In B. McGaw, E. Baker, and P.P. Peterson (Eds.), International encyclopedia of education. New York: Elsevier. Available at: http://www.mofet.macam.ac.il/prof/sadnaot/selfstudy/Documents/NarrativeInquiry.pdf.
16. Clavin, B., and Lewis A. (2005). Focus groups on consumers’ ethical beliefs. In R. Harrison, T. Newholm, and D. Shaw (Eds.), The ethical consumer (pp. 173-187) London: Sage. Available at: https://www.escholar.manchester.ac.uk/uk-ac-man-scw:4b2293.
17. Clouder, S. and Harrison, R. (2005). The effectiveness of ethical consumer behaviour. In R. Harrison, T. Newholm, and D. Shaw (Eds.), The ethical consumer (pp. 89-102). London: Sage. Available at: https://www.escholar.manchester.ac.uk/uk-ac-man-scw:4b2293.
18. Confucius (2014). The Analects. New York: Penguin Books. 256 p. Available at: http://infinity.wecabrio.com/143106856-the-analects-penguin-classics.pdf.
19. Co-operative Bank Report (2011). Ethical Consumerism Report. Available at: https://www.co-operativebank.co.uk/.
20. Crane, A., and Matten, D. (2004). Business ethics. Oxford: Oxford University Press. ISBN: 0-19-925515-6. 506p.
21. Darnell, C., Gulliford, L., Kristjánsson, K., and Panos, P. (2019). Phronesis and the knowledge–action gap in moral psychology and moral education: A new synthesis? Human Development, 62(3), 101-129. DOI:10.1159/000496136.
22. Devinney, T.M., Auger, P., and Eckhardt, G.M. (2010). The myth of the ethical consumer. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI:10.5840/beq201323444.
23. Fisher, B., Turner, R.K., and Morling, P. (2009). Defining and classifying ecosystem services for decision making. Ecological Economics, 68(3), 643-653. DOI:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2008.09.014.
24. Gallie, W. B. (1956). Essentially contestable concepts. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, 56, 167-198. DOI:10.5840/inquiryctnews19941415.
25. Gao, X.H. (2013). Revisiting the golden arches in China: The Chinese discourse on McDonald’s between 1978-2012. Journal of Marketing, 33(4), 288-305. DOI:10.1177/0276146713493805.
26. Garcia-Ruiz, P., and Rodriguez-Lluesma, C. (2014). Consumption practices: A virtue ethics approach. Business Ethics Quarterly, 24(4), 509-531. DOI:10.5840/beq20147313.
27. Haidt, J. (2012). The righteous mind: Why good people are divided by politics and religion. New York: Pantheon Books. DOI:10.1017/S0953820813000253.
28. Harrison, R., Newholm, T., and Shaw, D. (Eds.). (2005). The ethical consumer. London: Sage. Available at: www.manchester.ac.uk/escholar/uk-ac-man-scw:4b2293.
29. Huang, J.J. (2005). Discussions on Confucianism’s “human” and “nature” relationships: Implications for 21^st century. Modern Philosophy, 1, 59-67. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1000-7660.2005.01.008.
30. Humphry, K. (2011). The simple and the good: Ethical consumption as anti-consumerism. In T. Lewis, and E. Potter (Eds.), Ethical consumption: A critical introduction (pp. 40-53). New York: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203867785.
31. Huo, Y., and Kristjánsson, K. (2018). Why is there lack of growth in character virtues? An insight into business students across British business school. In D. Carr (Ed.), Cultivating moral character and virtue in professional practice (pp. 207-221). London: Routledge. Available at: https://mysuccesskeys.com/cultivating-moral-character-and-virtue-in-professional-practice/.
32. Husserl, E. (1970). The idea of phenomenology. The Hague: Nijhoff. ISBN:978-90-247-0114-8. Available at: https://www.springer.com/gp/book/9780792356912.
33. Joergens, C. (2006). Ethical fashion: Myth or future trend? Journal of Fashion Marketing and Management, 10(3), 360-371. DOI:10.1108/13612020610679321.
34. Jordan, K., and Kristjánsson, K. (2017). Sustainability, virtue ethics, and the virtue of harmony with nature. Environmental Education Research, 23(9), 1205-1229. DOI:10.1080/13504622.2016.1157681.
35. Kent, T. (2005). Ethical perspectives on the erotic in retailing. Qualitative Market Research, 8(4), 430-439. doi:10.1108/13522750510619788.
36. Kirkman, M. (2002). What’s the plot? Applying narrative theory to research in psychology. Australian Psychologist, 37(1), 30-38. DOI:10.1108/13522750510619788.
37. Kong, D.X. (2009). A discussion on Confucius consumption views. Journal of Xuchang University, 28(1), 94-96. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1671-9824.2009.01.026.
38. Kozinets, R.V., and Handelamn, J.M. (1998). Ensouling consumption: A netnographic exploration of boycott behavior. Advances in Consumer Research, 25, 475-480. Available at: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/235356525_Ensouling_Consumption_A_Netnographic_Exploration_of_the_Meaning_of_Boycotting_Behavior.
39. Kristjánsson, K. (1996). Social freedom: The responsibility view. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI:10.1017/S0012217300010039.
40. Kristjánsson, K. (2020). Flourishing as the aim of education: A neo-Aristotelian view. London: Routledge. ISBN:9780429464898. 228 p. Available at: https://www.routledge.com/Flourishing-as-the-Aim-of-Education-A-Neo-Aristotelian-View/Kristjansson/p/book/9780367727970.
41. Langdridge, D. (2007). Phenomenological psychology: Theory, research and methods. London: Pearson. DOI:10.1108/17465640710778548.
42. Laverty, S.M. (2003). Hermeneutic phenomenology and phenomenology: A comparison of historical and methodological considerations. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 2(3), 21-35. DOI:10.1177/160940690300200303.
43. Lee, M.H. (2015). Lone no more: The sociable ethical consumer. Thesis submitted for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy at the University of Leicester. Available at: https://ethos.bl.uk/OrderDetails.do?uin=uk.bl.ethos.643674.
44. Littler, J. (2010). What is wrong with ethical consumption? In T. Lewis, and E. Potter (Eds.), Ethical consumption: A critical introduction (pp. 27-39). New York: Routledge. doi/10.9774/GLEAF.9780203867785_3.
45. MacIntyre, A. (1981). After virtue. Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press. DOI:10.1017/S0360966900022416.
46. MacIntyre, A. (1999). Dependent rational animals. New York: Bloomsbury Academic. DOI:10.5216/phi.v6i1/2.3133.
47. McGrath, R.E., and Walker, D.I. (2016). Factor structure of character strengths in youth: Consistency across ages and measures. Journal of Moral Education, 45(4), 400-418. DOI:10.1080/03057240.2016.1213709.
48. Markus, H.R., and Kitayama, S. (1991). Culture and self: Implications for cognition, emotion, and motivation. Psychological Review, 98(2), 224-253. Available at: https://web.stanford.edu/~hazelm/publications/1991%20Markus%20Kitayama%20Culture%20and%20the%20self.pdf.
49. O’Rourke, D. (2006). Looking behind the label: ethical consumption issues today. In T. Daly, C. Regan, and C. Regan (Eds.) Development in an unequal world (pp. 291-302). New Internationalist: Pixelpress. doi/10.18546/IJDEGL.09.2.05.
50. Ouyang, Z.R. (2015). On the relationship between man and nature in The Great Learning and The Doctrine of the Mean. China Culture Research, 1, 12-20. Available at: http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTotal-ZWHY201501002.htm.
51. Peterson, C., and Seligman, M.E.P. (2004). Character strengths and virtues: A handbook and classification. New York: Oxford University Press. ISBN:0-19-516701-5. 800 p. Available at: https://www.apa.org/pubs/books/4317046.
52. Percy, I. (2006). Living reflexive qualitative research: resonance and authenticity. In J. Higgs, A. Titchen, H. Armstrong, and D. Horsfall (Eds.). Being critical and creative in qualitative research (pp. 97-107). Sydney: Hampden Press. Available at: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/288542815_Living_Reflexive_Qualitative_Research_Resonance_and_Authenticity.
53. Regan, T. (2004). The case for animal rights. Berkeley: University of California Press. DOI:10.1007/978-94-009-3331-6_15.
54. Reynolds, J.L. (2019). An economic analysis of international environmental rights. International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics, 19(6), 557-575. DOI:10.1007/s10784-019-09454-7.
55. Real Think Tank (2007). Retailers are not influenced by ethical consumers. Retail Think Tank White Paper. Available at: http://www.retailthinktank.co.uk/whitepaper/retailers-are-not-influenced-by-ethical-consumers-its-simply-that-a-socially-responsible-retailer-is-more-profitable/.
56. Shaw, D., and Clarke, I. (1999). Belief formation in ethical consumer groups: An exploratory study. Marketing Intelligence and Planning, 17(2), 109-119. DOI:10.1108/02634509910260968.
57. Shaw, D., and Shiu, E. (2003). Ethics in consumer choice: a multivariate modelling approach. European Journal of Marketing, 37(10), 1085-1099. DOI:10.1108/03090560310487202.
58. Shenton, A.K. (2004). Strategies for ensuring trustworthiness in qualitative research projects. Education for Information, 22(1), 63-75. DOI:10.3233/EFI-2004-22201.
59. Sigurðsson, G. (2014). Frugalists, anti-consumers, and prosumers: Chinese philosophical perspectives on consumerism. In A. Hulme (Ed.), The changing landscape of China’s consumerism (pp. 125-149). London: Chandos. DOI:10.1533/9781780634425.125.
60. Silverman, D. (2013). Doing qualitative research. London: Sage. doi:10.1364/AO.45.000335.
61. Sim, M. (2007). Remastering morals with Aristotle and Confucius. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 240 p. Available at: https://www.twirpx.com/file/2550676/.
62. Singer, P. (1997). How are we to live? Ethics in the age of self-interest. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Available at: phr199710616.
63. Singer, P. (2002). One world: The ethics of globalization. New Haven: Yale University Press. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1523-1739.2004.1812_2.x.
64. Sison, A.J.G., Beabout, G.R., and Ferraro, I. (Eds.) (2017). Handbook of virtue ethics in business and management. Dordrecht: Springer. Available at: https://www.springer.com/gp/book/9789400765092.
65. Slote, W.H., and De Vos, G.A. (1998). Confucianism and the family. New York: State University of New York Press. Available at: https://ci.nii.ac.jp/ncid/BA37996566.
66. Smith, N.C. (1990). Morality and the market: Consumer pressure for corporate accountability. London: Routledge. DOI:10.2307/2393461.
67. Solomon, R.C. (2004). Aristotle, ethics and business organizations. Organization Studies, 25(6), 1021-1043. DOI:10.1177/0170840604042409
68. Szmigin, I., and Carrigan, C. (2006). Exploring the dimensions of ethical consumption. European Advances in Consumer Research, 7, 608-613. Available at: https://www.acrwebsite.org/volumes/eacr/vol7/europeanvolume7_25.pdf.
69. Thompson, M. (2010) Signals of virtue in Chinese consumerism and business. Journal of International Business Ethics, 3(2), 71-79. Available at: https://www.docin.com/p-1594882936.html.
70. Tu, W.M. (2014). The global implications of the doctrine of ren: The humanistic spirit and ecological awareness of Confucianism. Confucian Academy, 001(001), 12-29, 117-135. Available at: http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTotal-KXTK201401010.htm.
71. Wajda, T.A., Hu, M.Y., and Cui, A.P. (2007). Self-evaluation shopping/consumption motives: Identifying differences in the U.S. and China. Journal of Global Marketing, 21(1), 49-62. DOI:10.1300/J042v21n01-05.
72. Webster, L., and Mertova, P. (2007). Using narrative inquiry as a research method. London: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203946268.
73. Wilson, H., and Hutchinson, S. (1991). Triangulation of qualitative methods: Heideggerian hermeneutics and grounded theory. Qualitative Health Research, 1(2), 263-276. DOI:10.1177/104973239100100206.
74. Yau, A., and Davies, I. (2015). The modern renegotiations of Confucian ethics and implications on ethical consumption in China. In L. Robinson (Ed.), Marketing dynamism and sustainability: Things change, things stay the same. Developments in Marketing Science: Proceedings of the Academy of Marketing Science (pp. 212-221). Dordrecht: Springer. Available at: https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-319-10912-1_70.
75. Yu, J.Y. (2007). The ethics of Confucius and Aristotle: Mirrors of virtue. New York: Routledge. 292 p. DOI:10.1353/pew.0.0105