Contents |
Authors:
Sivanathan Sivaruban, ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8280-1183 MBA (Aus), FCMA, B. Com (Spl), CPA PNG, HNDA, MAAT, Senior Lecturer, International Training Institute, Port Moresby, Papua New Guinea
Pages: 57-65
Language: English
DOI: https://doi.org/10.21272/bel.5(1).57-65.2021
Received: 20.02.2021
Accepted: 23.03.2021
Published: 30.03.2021
Download: |
Views: |
Downloads: |
|
|
|
Abstract
This paper summarizes leadership theories and critically analyzes the different viewpoints on leadership theory in the real corporate world. The main purpose of the study is to examine leadership theories from a critical perspective in a practical context. The systematization of the literature sources and study approaches for solving the problem on a practical perspective toward leadership theories that indicate leadership theories are emerging research topics in the dynamic environment. The relevance of this critical perspective on leadership theories is redesign leadership style based on the current business environment. Investigation of the leadership theories from a critical perspective is conducted in the following logical sequence, such as the introduction, literature review, methodological tools of the research, analysis of each leadership theory, results, discussion, and conclusion of the study. The paper presents the outcome of an empirical analysis on a critical perspective of leadership theories, which showed that leadership theories have not yet been combined. The research empirically confirms that leadership theories prove that the outcome of the study can be a critical tool for future researchers, industry practitioners and other related stakeholders to redesign the leadership style to suit the competitive business environment. The result of the research can be useful to provide significant implications and insights into the leadership theories. A critical analysis of those theories shall enlighten the literature review of leadership theories and redesign leadership style to create a new set of leadership theories since no universal leadership style is accepted in the world. Finally, the leadership style has shifted to another dimension in emotional intelligence due to COVID-19, the global pandemic, creating a new set of attributable skills such as good listening skills, resilience, collaboration, and empathy. COVID-19 has developed a unique leadership style called resilient style.
Keywords: Behavioral Theory, Contingency Theory, Leadership, Path-Goal Theory, Trait Theory.
JEL Classification: M10, M12.
Cite as: Sivaruban, S. (2021). A Critical Perspective of Leadership Theories. Business Ethics and Leadership, 5(1), 57-65. https://doi.org/10.21272/bel.5(1).57-65.2021
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
References
- Avolio, B.J. (2007). Promoting more integrative strategies for leadership theory – building. American Psychologist. DOI:10.1037/0003-066X.62.1.25.
- Barling, J., Christie, A., & Hoption, C. (2011). Leadership. In S. Zedeck (Ed.), APA handbook of industrial and organizational psychology, Vol. 1, Building and developing the organization. American Psychological Association. https://doi.org/10.1037/12169-007.
- Bartol, K., & Martin, D. (1998). Management, 3rd Ed., USA, McGraw – Hill Companies Inc. Available at: https://www.worldcat.org/title/management/oclc/715919148.
- Bass, B. (1990b). From Transactional to Transformational Leadership: Learning to share the vision. Organizational Dynamics, 18(3), 19-31. https://doi.org/10.1016/0090-2616(90)90061-S.
- Bastian, H., & Wald, A. (2012). A bibliometric view on the use of contingency theory in project management research. Project Management Journal, 43(2), 5-20. https://doi.org/10.1002%2Fpmj.21267.
- Bennis, W.G. (2007). The challenges of leadership study in the modern world – Introduction to the special issue. American Psychologist. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.62.1.2.
- Billing, M. (2015). Kurt Lewin’s leadership studies and his legacy to social psychology: Is there nothing as practical as a good theory? Journal for the Theory of Social Behavior, 45(4). https://doi.org/10.1111/jtsb.12074.
- Bryman, A. (1986). Leadership and Organisations. Boston, MA: Routledge & Kegan Paul. 235 p. Available at: https://pdfslide.net/documents/leadership-and-organizations-a-bryman-routledge-kegan-paul-london-1986.html.
- Cherry, K. (2018). Situational leadership theory. Available at: https://www.Verywellmind.com/what-is-the-situational–theory-of-leadership-2795321.
- Daft, R. (1999). Leadership Theory and practices. Fort Worth, TX: Dryden Press. 496 p. Available at: https://www.worldcat.org/title/leadership-theory-and-practice/oclc/40461786.
- Fiedler, F. (1975). The leadership game, matching the man to the situation. Organisational Dynamics, 6-16. Available at: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/0090261676900322.
- Fiedler, F.E. (2006). The contingency model: a theory of leadership effectiveness, In Levine, J.M. & Moreland, R.L.(Eds.), Small Groups Key Realigns, Psychology Press, New York. Available at: https://www.taylorfrancis.com/chapters/reading-20-contingency-model-theory-leadership-effectiveness-fred-fiedler/e/10.4324/9780203647585-33.
- Fleeor. J. W. (2006). Trait approach to leadership. Encyclopedia of Industrial and Organisational Psychology, Thousand Oaks, Sage Publications. 830-832. Available at: https://www.academia.edu/15810226/Trait_Approach_to_Leadership.
- Gardner, J. (1990). On Leadership. New York: Free Press. 220 p. Available at: https://www.worldcat.org/title/on-leadership/oclc/20013777.
- Gordon, J.R. (1991). A Diagnostic Approach to Organizational Behaviour. Allyn and Bacon, USA. 779 p. Available at: https://www.biblio.com/book/diagnostic-approach-organizational-behavior-judith-r/d/1234564117.
- Graeff, C.L. (1983). The situational leadership theory: a critical view. Academy of Management Review. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1983.4284738.
- Griffin R.W. (1990). Management, 3rd Edition, Houghtion Miffin Company, Boston, USA. 884 p. Available at: https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.2307/257756.
- Harrison, C. (2018). Leadership theory and Research. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. 128 p. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-68672-1.
- Holda, W. (1995). Leader – follower congruence: An analysis of community college presidential leadership, PhD dissertation, Texas A & M University at Commerce. Available at: https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/4268413.pdf.
- Hughes, T. (2005). Identification of Leadership style of enrollment management professionals in Post-Secondary Institutions in the southern United States, Ph.D. dissertation, Texas Tech. University. Available at:https://media.proquest.com/media/pq/classic/doc/4327168049/fmt/ai/rep/NPDF?_s=6eV6l5SDki8hbeU0BkyriYM4OVQ%3D.
- Johns, H.E., & Moses, H.R. (2001). From trait to transformation: the evolution of leadership theories. Education, 110(1), 115-122. Available at: https://www.psycholosphere.com/From%20trait%20to%20transformation%20-%20The%20evolution%20of%20leadership%20theories%20by%20Johns%20&%20Moser.pdf.
- Judge, T.A., Bono, J.E., Ilies, R., & Gerhardt, M.G. (2002). Personality and leadership: A qualitative and quantitative review. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87(4), 765-780. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.87.4.765.
- Kirkpatrick, S.A., & Locke, E.A. (1991). Leadership: Do traits matter? Academy of Management Perspectives, 5(2), 48-60. https://doi.org/10.5465/AME.1991.4274679.
- Kraft, M.H.G. (2018). Antecedents and Perspectives of Ambidextrous Leadership. Marketing and Management of Innovations, 4, 5-13. http://doi.org/10.21272/mmi.2018.4-01.
- Leftwich, P. (2001). Transformational Leadership at the Department Chair level in North Carolina Community Colleges, Ph.D. dissertation, North Carolina State University. Available at: https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED457938.
- Northhouse, P.G. (2010). Leadership: Theory and Practice (5th Ed.). Thousand Oaks: CA; Sage. 456 p. ISBN: 0‐8077‐4679‐7.
- Pierce, J.L., & Dunham, R.B. (1990). Managing Scott, Foresman/Little, Brown Higher Education, London, England. 591 p. Available at: https://www.worldcat.org/title/management/oclc/301365777.
- Shonhiwa, D.C. (2016). An Examination of the situational leadership approach: Strengths and weaknesses. Cross – Currents. International Peer-Reviewed Journal on Humanities & Social Sciences, 2(2), 35-40. https://doi.org/10.19030/jdm.v13i2.10218.
- Stogdill, R.M. (1974). Handbook of Leadership: A survey of the literature, New York, Free Press. 581 p. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F002194367501200210.
- Uslu, O. (2019). A general overview to leadership theories from a critical perspective. Marketing and Management of Innovations, 1, 161-172. http://doi.org/10.21272/mmi.2019.1-13.
- Yukl, G. (2002). Leadership in Organizations. 5th ed. – International, Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, N.J. 528 p. Available at: link.
- Wallace, M., & Weese, W. (1995). Leadership, organizational culture, and Job Satisfaction in Canadian YMCA organizations. Journal of Sport Management, 9(2), 182-193. https://doi.org/10.1123/JSM.9.2.182.
- Zacccaro, S.J. (2007). Trait-Based Perspectives of Leadership. American Psychologist, 62(1), 6-16. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.62.1.6.
|