Abstract

This qualitative descriptive study explored what community college administrators and faculty described as being effective recruitment and retention methods for faculty at community colleges in the Northeastern United States. This study answered two research questions: what recruitment methods do administrators and American faculty at community colleges describe as being effective in the recruitment of American faculty? Also, what retention methods do administrators and American faculty at community colleges describe as being effective in the retention of American faculty? The researcher applied critical race theory to form a framework for best practices in recruiting and retaining American faculty. Data were obtained by interviewing six American faculty and surveying seven community college administrators employed at Massachusetts community colleges who were selected using purposive sampling and community college online staff directories. Using MAXQDA data analysis software, the researcher initiated data analysis using thematic analysis. Data were organized and analyzed to identify codes, categories, and themes. Data analysis resulted in six themes: hiring processes, faculty diversity, recruitment strategies, work environment, student and faculty relationships, and retention strategies. The findings of this study can benefit community college personnel by recommending recruitment and retention strategies to effectively recruit and retain American faculty. There was limited research and data available related to the recruitment and retention of African American male faculty at community colleges. The faculty and administrator participants of this study provided rich data on effective recruitment and retention methods for African American male faculty at community colleges. The critical race theory theoretical framework was summarized. Theoretical and practical implications emerged. Based on the data and new insights, implications for future research were discussed.

Keywords: American, Faculty, Recruitment, Retention, Strategies, Community College, Critical Race Theory.

JEL Classification: J15.

Cite as: Phillips, D., Kasztelnik, K. (2021). The International Descriptive Study of Effective Methods for the Recruitment and the Retention of Faculty in the United States. Business Ethics and Leadership, 5(2), 21-58. https://doi.org/10.21272/bel.5(2).21-58.2021

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License

References

1. Abdul-Raheem, J. (2016). Faculty diversity and tenure in higher education. Journal of Cultural Diversity, 23(2), 53-56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
2. Adams, C., & van Manen, M.A. (2017). Teaching phenomenological research and writing. Qualitative Health Research, 27(6), 780-791. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
3. Alger, J. (1997). The Educational Value of Diversity. Academe, 83(1), 20-23. [CrossRef]
4. Amankwaa, L. (2016). Creating protocols for trustworthiness in qualitative research. Journal of Cultural Diversity, 23(3), 121-127. [Google Scholar]
5. American Association of Colleges for Teacher Education (2018). Holmes Program. Available at: [Link]
6. American Association of Community Colleges (2018). Fast Facts. Available at: [Link]
7. Antonio, A.L. (2002). Faculty of color reconsidered: Reassessing contributions to scholarship. The Journal of Higher Education, 73(5), 582. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
8. Arboleda, A.M., & Alonso, J.C. (2017) Students’ emotional experience at the university: An alternative approach to understanding students as consumers. Services marketing Quarterly, 38(3), 129-141. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
9. Arnett, A.A. (2015). Diverse by design: Recruiting and retaining faculty of color takes sustained administrative effort, experts say. Diverse Issues in Higher Education, 18, 10-11. Available at: [Link]
10. Ashford, E. (2018). Faculty diversity is a worthy goal. Available at: [Link]
11. Aymer, V.L. (2017). Black and Latino faculty navigating the academy: Recruitment, retention, tenure, and the academic culture (Publication № 10270437) [Doctoral dissertation]. ProQuest Dissertations & Theses Global. [CrossRef]
12. Barhoum, S. (2018). Increasing student success: Structural recommendations for community colleges. Journal of Developmental Education, 41(3), 18- Available at: [Link]
13. Bianco, M., Leech, N., & Mitchell, K. (2011). Pathways to teaching: American male teens explore teaching as a career. The Journal of Negro Education, 3, 368. [Google Scholar]
14. Birt, L., Scott, S., Cavers, D., Campbell, C., & Walter, F. (2016). Member checking: A tool to enhance trustworthiness or merely a nod to validation? Qualitative Health Research, 26(13), 1802-1811. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
15. Blockett, R.A., Felder, P.P., Parrish, W., III, & Collier, J. (2016). Pathways to the professoriate: exploring Black doctoral student socialization and the pipeline to the academic profession. The Western Journal of Black Studies, 2, 95. [Google Scholar]
16. Boyd, K. (2018). Using critical race theory to solve our profession’s critical race issues. Journal of Financial Planning, 30- Available at: [Link]
17. Business Dictionary (2019). Recruitment In com. Available at: [Link]
18. Business Dictionary (2019). Retention In com. Available at: [Link]
19. Castleberry, A., & Nolen, A. (2018). Thematic analysis of qualitative research data: Is it as easy as it sounds? Currents in Pharmacy Teaching and Learning, 10(6), 807-815. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
20. Cole, E.R., McGowan, B.L., & Zerquera, D.D. (2017). First-year faculty of color: Narratives about entering the academy. Equity & Excellence in Education, 50(1), 1-12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
21. Colorafi, K.J., & Evans, B. (2016). Qualitative descriptive methods in health science research. HERD: Health Research & Design Journal, 9(4), 16-25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
22. Connelly, L.M. (2016). Trustworthiness in qualitative research. Medsurg Nursing, 25(6), 435-436. Available at: [Link]
23. Craig, M.A., & Richeson, J.A. (2017). Information about the US racial demographic shift triggers concerns about anti-White discrimination among the prospective White “minority.” PLoS ONE, 9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
24. Critical Race Theory in Higher Education (2015). ASHE Higher Education Report, 41(3), 1-56. Available at: [Link]
25. Cruz, R.F., & Tantia, J.F. (2016). Reading and understanding qualitative research. American Journal of Dance Therapy, 39(1), 79-92. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
26. Dade, K., Tartakov, C., Hargrave, C., & Leigh, P. (2015). Assessing the impact of racism on Black faculty in white academe: A collective case study of American female faculty. The Western Journal of Black Studies, 2, 134. [Google Scholar]
27. Davis, L., & Fry, R. (2019). College faculty have become more racially and ethnically diverse, but remain far less so than students. Available at: [Link]
28. Delanoy, N. & kasztelnik, K. (2020). Business Open Data Analytics to Support Innovation Leadership and Management Decision in Canada. Business Ethics and Leadership, 4(2), 56-74. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
29. Edwards, R.L. (2015). An examination of effective recruiting and retention practices for American and Hispanic/Latino faculty in higher education (Publication № 3704177) [Doctoral dissertation]. ProQuest Dissertations & Theses Global. Available at: [Link]
30. Merriam-Webster (2019). Effective. In Merriam-Webster.com. Available at: [Link]
31. Etikan, I., Musa, S.A., & Alkassim, R.S. (2016). Comparison of convenience sampling and purposive sampling. American Journal of Theoretical and Applied Statistics, 5(1), 1-4. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
32. Fires, P.M., & Sharperson, K.E. (2018). Making the case: How diversity and inclusion can improve your firm’s financial outlook. Defense Counsel Journal, 85(1), 1- [Google Scholar]
33. Fischer, C. (2009). Bracketing in qualitative research: Conceptual and practical matters. Psychotherapy Research, 19(4-5), 583-590. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
34. Fusch, P.I., & Ness, L.R. (2015). Are we there yet? Data saturation in qualitative research. The Qualitative Report, 20(9), 1408-1416. [Google Scholar]
35. Gasman, M., Kim, J., & Nguyen, T.H. (2011). Effectively recruiting faculty of color at highly selective institutions: A school of education case study. Journal of Diversity in Higher Education, 4(4), 212-222. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
36. Giorgi, A. (2012). The descriptive phenomenological psychological method. Journal of Phenomenological Psychology, 1, 3. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
37. Giorgi, A.P., & Giorgi, B.M. (2003). The descriptive phenomenological psychological method. In Qualitative research in psychology: Expanding perspectives in methodology and design. (pp. 243-273). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
38. Glasener, K.M., Martell, C.A., & Posselt, J.R. (2018). Framing diversity: Examining the place of race in institutional policy and practice post-affirmative action. Journal of Diversity in Higher Education, 12(1), 3-19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
39. Gordon, D. (2017). How can California’s community colleges increase faculty diversity? USC News. Available at: [Link]
40. Hadi, M.A., & Closs, S.J. (2016). Ensuring rigor and trustworthiness of qualitative research in clinical pharmacy. International Journal of Clinical Pharmacy, 38, 641-646. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
41. Han, I., & Ochwari, J.A. (2018). Development and implementation of culturally responsive mentoring program for faculty and staff of color. Interdisciplinary Journal of Partnership Studies, 5(2), 1-26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
42. Han, K.T. (2014). Moving racial discussion forward: A counterstory of racialized dynamics between an Asian-woman faculty and White preservice teachers in traditional rural America. Journal of Diversity in Higher Education, 7(2), 126-146. [Google Scholar]
43. Hayes, C., & Fasching-Varner, K.J. (2015). Racism 2.0 and the death of social and cultural foundations of education: A critical conversation. Educational Foundations, 28(1), 103- [Google Scholar]
44. Heelan, C.M., & Mellow, G.O. (2017). Social justice and the community college mission. New Directions for Community Colleges, 2017(180), 19- [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
45. Howard, T.C., & Navarro, O. (2016). Critical race theory 20 years later: Where do we go from here? Urban Education, 51(3), 253- [CrossRef]
46. Hubbell, L. (2015). Students are not consumers. Springer Science + Business Media, 28, 82-89. Available at: [Link]
47. Joshi, S., McCutcheon, P., & Sweet, E.L. (2015). Visceral geographies of whiteness and invisible microaggressions. ACME: An International E-Journal for Critical Geographies, 14(1), 298-323. [Google Scholar]
48. Kasztelnik, K., Gaines, V.W. (2019). Correlational Study: Internal Auditing and Management Control Environment Innovation within Public Sector in the United States. Financial Markets, Institutions and Risks, 3(4), 5-15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
49. Kasztelnik, K. (2020). Causal-Comparative Macroeconomic Behavioral Study: International Corporate Financial Transfer Pricing in the United States. Financial Markets, Institutions and Risks, 4(1), 60-75. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
50. Kelly, B.T., Gayles, J.G., & Williams, C.D. (2017). Recruitment without retention: A critical case of Black faculty unrest. Journal of Negro Education, 3, 305. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
51. Kets, W. (2015). Want more innovation? Get more diversity. The Chronicle of Higher Education, 13, 27. Available at: [Link]
52. Kim, H., Sefcik, J.S., & Bradway, C. (2017). Characteristics of qualitative descriptive studies: A systematic review. Research in Nursing & Health, 40(1), 23-42. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
53. Kim, Y.K., & Sax, L.J. (2014). The effects of student-faculty interaction on academic self-concept: Does academic major matter? Research in Higher Education, 8, 780-809. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
54. Krueger, R., & Casey, M. (2015). Focus Groups. A Practical Guide for Applied Research. 5th ed. Sage Publication, Thousand Oaks, CA. [Google Scholar]
55. Kruth, J.G. (2015). Five qualities research approaches and their applications in parapsychology. Journal of Parapsychology, 79(2), 219-233. [Google Scholar]
56. Lee, J.A. (2018). Affirmation, support, and advocacy: Critical race theory and academic advising. NACADA Journal, 38(1), 77. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
57. Leung, L. (2015). Validity, reliability, and generalizability in qualitative research. Journal of Family Medicine and Primary Care, 4(3), 324. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
58. Loveless-Morris, J.A., & Reid, L.S. (2018). Learning communities: Opportunities for the retention of faculty of color. Learning Communities Research and Practice, 6(1), 1-4. [Google Scholar]
59. Lovell, N.B., Alexander, M.L., & Kirkpatrick, L.A. (2002). Minority faculty at community colleges. Phi Delta Kappa Fastbacks, 490, 7-36. Available at: [Link]
60. Lundberg, C.A. (2014). Peers and faculty as predictors of learning for community college students. Community College Review, 42(2), 79- [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
61. Lundy-Wagner, V., Vultaggio, J., & Gasman, M. (2013). Preparing underrepresented students of color for doctoral success: The role of undergraduate institutions. International Journal of Doctoral Studies, 8, 151- [Google Scholar]
62. Lynch-Alexander, E. (2017). Black minds matter: The call to retention of young Black academics (YBAs) in higher education. International Journal of the Academic Business World, 11(1), 31-37. [Google Scholar]
63. Madyun, N., Williams, S.M., McGee, E.O., & Milner, H.R., IV. (2013). On the importance of African-American faculty in higher education: implications and recommendations. Educational Foundations, 3-4, 65-84. [Google Scholar]
64. Magloire, J. (2019). Who wants to teach a diverse student body? Community college missions and the faculty search committee. Community College Journal of Research and Practice, 43(3), 165-172. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
65. Marshall, C., & Rossman, G.B. (2014). Designing qualitative research (5th ed.). Los Angeles, CA: Sage Publications. Available at: [Link]
66. Matias, C.E., Montoya, R., & Nishi, N.W. (2016). Blocking CRT: How the emotionality of whiteness blocks CRT in urban teacher education. Educational Studies, 52(1), 1-19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
67. Merriam-Webster (2019). American. In Merriam-Webster.com. Available at: [Link]
68. Merriam-Webster (2019). Diversity. In Merriam-Webster.com. Available at: [Link]
69. Merriam-Webster (2019). Effective. In Merriam-Webster.com. Available at: [Link]
70. Merriam-Webster (2019). Faculty. In Merriam-Webster.com. Available at: [Link]
71. Merriam-Webster (2019). Faculty of Color. In Merriam-Webster.com. Available at: [Link]
72. Merriam-Webster (2019). Latinx. In Merriam-Webster.com. Available at: [Link]
73. McCusker, K., & Gunaydin, S. (2015). Research using qualitative, quantitative, or mixed methods and choice based on the research. Perfusion, 30(7), 537-542. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
74. McGowan, J.M. (2000). Multicultural teaching: African-American faculty classroom teaching experiences in predominantly white colleges and universities. Multicultural Education, 8(2), 19-22. [Google Scholar]
75. Mena, J.A., & Vaccaro, A. (2017). I’ve struggled, I’ve battled: Invisibility microaggressions experienced by women of color at a predominantly White institution. NASPA Journal About Women in Higher Education, 10(3), 301-318. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
76. Morest, V.S. (2015). Faculty scholarship at community colleges: Culture, institutional structures, and socialization. New Directions for Community Colleges, 171, 21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
77. Moses, Y. (2012). An institutional approach to recruiting and retaining a diverse faculty. On Campus With Women, 41(1). [Google Scholar]
78. Moshiri, F., & Cardon, P.W. (2016). A study of faculty racial diversity in business schools: Perceptions of business deans. Journal of Education for Business, 91(5), 243-250. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
79. Nassaji, H. (2015). Qualitative and descriptive research: Data type versus data analysis. Language Teaching Research, 19(2), 129-132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
80. National Center for Education Statistics (2018). Digest of Education Statistics, 2016. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education. [Google Scholar]
81. National Center for Education Statistics (2019). Digest of Education Statistics, Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education. Available at: [Link]
82. National Center for Science and Engineering Statistics (2019). Doctorate recipients from U.S. universities, Alexandria, VA: National Science Foundation. Available at: [Link]
83. National Commission for the Protection of Human Subjects of Biomedical and Behavioral Research (1979). The Belmont report: Ethical principles and guidelines for the protection of human subjects of research. Available at: [Link]
84. Niemann, Y.F. (2016). The social ecology of tokenism in higher education. Peace Review, 28(4), 451- [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
85. Nowell, L.S., Norris, J.M., White, D.E., & Moules, N.J. (2017). Thematic analysis: Striving to meet the trustworthiness criteria. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 16(1). [Google Scholar]
86. Park, J., & Park, M. (2016). Qualitative verses quantitative research methods: discovery or justification? Journal of Marketing Thought, 3(1), 1-7. [Google Scholar]
87. Pérez Huber, L., & Solorzano, D.G. (2015). Racial microaggressions as a tool for critical race research. Race Ethnicity and Education, 18(3), 297-320. [Google Scholar]
88. Phelps-Ward, R., & DeAngelo, L. (2016). Feeding the pipeline toward the doctorate: Examining the formal mentoring experiences of Black undergraduate students. The Western Journal of Black Studies, 40(2), 111- [Google Scholar]
89. Phillips, R. (2002). Recruiting and retaining a diverse faculty. Planning for Higher Education, 4, 32. Available at: [Link]
90. Polit, D.F., & Beck, C.T. (2014). Nursing Research: Generating and Assessing Evidence for Nursing Practice. 8th ed. Philadelphia: Wolters Kluwer. [Google Scholar]
91. Ponjuan, L. (2011). Recruiting and retaining Latino faculty members: The missing pieces to Latino student success. [Google Scholar]
92. Profiles of the Most Promising Places to Work in Community Colleges (2018). Diverse: Issues in Higher Education, 35(8), 14-18. Available at: [Link]
93. Pyrczak, F., & Bruce, R.R. (2016). Writing empirical research reports: A basic guide for students of the social and behavioral sciences. London: Routledge. [Google Scholar]
94. Rodriguez, F.C. (2015). Why diversity and equity matter: Reflections from a community college president. New Directions for Community Colleges, 172, 15- [Google Scholar]
95. Rosenbaum, J.E., Ahearn, C., & Rosenbaum, J. (2016). The community college option. Educational Leadership, 6, 48-53. [Google Scholar]
96. Ryder, A.J., Reason, R.D., Mitchell, J.J., Gillon, K., & Hemer, K.M. (2016). Climate for learning and students’ openness to diversity and challenge: A critical role for faculty. Journal of Diversity in Higher Education, 9(4), 339-352. [Google Scholar]
97. Saldaña, J. (2016). The coding manual for qualitative researchers. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. Available at: [Link]
98. Schudde, L., & Goldrick-Rab, S. (2015). On second chances and stratification: How sociologists think about community colleges. Community College Review, 1, 27. [Google Scholar]
99. Scott-Clayton, J., & Li, J. (2016). Black-White disparity in student loan debt more than triples after graduation. Evidence Speaks Reports, 2(3), 1-9. [Google Scholar]
100. Siegel, D.J., Barrett, T.G., & Smith, T.H. (2015). To stay or to go: A comparison of factors influential in the decisions of American faculty to remain at two elite southern research universities. Journal of Negro Education, 4, 593. [Google Scholar]
101. Simba, M. (2014). Critical race theory. Salem Press Encyclopedia. Available at: [Link]
102. Sims, J. (2010). A brief review of the Belmont Report. Dimensions of Critical Care Nursing, 29(4), 173. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
103. Sinanan, A. (2016). The value and necessity of mentoring American College students at PWI’s. Journal of Pan African Studies, 8, 155. Available at: [Link]
104. Smith, D.G., Turner, C.S., Osei-Kofi, N., & Richards, S. (2004). Interrupting the usual: Successful strategies for hiring diverse faculty. The Journal of Higher Education, 75(2), 133. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
105. Smith, P.R. (2018). Collecting sufficient evidence when conducting a case study. The Qualitative Report, 23(5), 1054-1048. [Google Scholar]
106. Sullivan, K.J. (2014). Town hall meeting to focus on underrepresented minority faculty mentoring and decision-making. Available at: [Link]
107. Tetnowski, J. (2015). Qualitative case study research design. Perspectives on Fluency & Fluency Disorders, 25(1), 39-45. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
108. Tierney, W.G. (1997). Organizational socializations in higher education. The Journal of Higher Education, 68, 1-16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
109. Tomlinson, M. (2017). Student perceptions of themselves as ‘consumers’ of higher education, British Journal of Sociology of Education, 38(4), 450-467. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
110. Umadia, K. & Kasztelnik, K. (2020). The Financial Innovative Business Strategies of Small to Medium Scale Enterprises in Developing Country and Influence for the Global Economy Performance. SocioEconomic Challenges, 4(3), 20-32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
111. Underrepresented (2019). In Merriam-Webster.com. Available at: [Link]
112. University of Vermont (2019). Diversity Recruitment and Retention Plan. Available at: [Link]
113. Vanderford, N.L. (2018). Research administrators should contribute to improving faculty hiring practices. Journal of Research Administration, 49(1), 100- Available at: [Link]
114. Vats, A., & Keller, D.A. (2018). Critical Race IP. Cardozo Arts & Entertainment Law Journal, 36(3), 735-795. [Google Scholar]
115. Vollman, A. (2016). Longtime commitment to diversity and inclusion fuels Columbia University’s success. INSIGHT Into Diversity, 87(1), 24-27. Available at: [Link]
116. Wilder, J., Osborne-Lampkin, L., & Jackson, E.N., Jr. (2015). Rearticulating Black faculty diversity efforts in the age of “postracialism” and Obama. The Western Journal of Black Studies, 3, 174-185. [Google Scholar]
117. Williams, J.B. (2018). Accountability as a debiasing strategy: Testing the effect of racial diversity in employment committees. Iowa Law Review, 4, 1593. [Google Scholar]
118. Wood, D., Kurtz-Costes, B., & Copping, K.E. (2011). Gender differences in motivational pathways to college for middle class American youths. Developmental Psychology, 47(4), 961-968. [Google Scholar]
119. Woodall, T., Hiller, A., & Resnick, S. (2014). Making sense of higher education: Students as consumers and the value of the university experience. Studies in Higher Education, 39(1), 48-67. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
120. Yin, R.K. (2016). Qualitative research from start to finish. New York: Guilford Press. 386 [CrossRef]
121. Yu, H. (2015). Student retention at two-year community colleges: A structural equation modeling approach. International Journal of Continuing Education and Lifelong Learning, 1, 85. [Google Scholar]
122. Yun, J.H., Baldi, B., & Sorcinelli, M.D. (2016). Mutual mentoring for early-career and underrepresented faculty: Model, research, and practice. Innovative Higher Education, 5, [Google Scholar]