Abstract

The distribution of pre-tax wages and salaries for employed individuals between the ages of 18-65 in the ten largest metropolitan areas of the USA are studied in this paper using the American Community Survey data from 2019. The included metropolitan areas are Atlanta-Sandy Springs-Roswell, Chicago–Naperville-Elgin, Dallas-Fort Worth-Arlington, Houston-The Woodlands-Sugar Land, Los Angeles-Long Beach-Anaheim, Miami-Fort Lauderdale-West Palm Beach, New York-Newark-Jersey City, Philadelphia-Camden-Wilmington, San Francisco-Oakland-Hayward, and Washington-Arlington-Alexandria. These ten metropolitan areas employed over 39 million individuals representing well over a quarter of the total employed labour force in the USA. Mean, median, standard error of the mean, 25th percentile, 50th percentile, and the Gini coefficient of pre-tax wages and salaries are presented for each metropolitan area. The metros differ significantly in terms of average pre-tax wages and salaries. They differ significantly in terms of the spread in the distribution of pre-tax wages and salaries measured both in terms of the inter-quartile range (the difference between 75th and 25th percentiles) and the Gini coefficient. San Francisco-Oakland-Hayward is found to have both the highest average pre-tax wages and salaries and widest inequality as measured by the Gini coefficient. The Smallest Gini coefficient is observed in Washington-Arlington-Alexandria metropolitan area. Inequality measured in terms of the Gini coefficient is nearly 15% higher in San Francisco-Oakland-Hayward as compared to Washington-Arlington-Alexandria. The average pre-tax wages and salaries are about 83% higher in San Francisco-Oakland-Hayward than Miami-Fort Lauderdale-West Palm Beach, the lowest in the nation. While aggregate nationwide inequalities attract intense attention, these regional variations point to significant and wide-ranging variations between different regions (metropolitan cities). By focusing on the pre-tax wages and salaries, this study allows us to tie inequalities that are most closely related to the labour market conditions, unlike other sources of income like capital gains, inheritance, government transfers, etc.

Keywords: Income Inequality, Pre-Tax Wages and Salaries, Regional Income Distribution, Urban Inequality, American Community Survey, Gini Coefficient.

JEL Classification: D31, E24, O15.

Cite as: Ray, A. (2021). Pre-Tax Wage and Salary Income Inequalities in Largest Metropolitan Areas in the United States. Business Ethics and Leadership, 5(2), 59-65. https://doi.org/10.21272/bel.5(2).59-65.2021

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License

References

1. Acemoglu, D., Autor, D.H. (2011). Skills, tasks and technologies: Implications for employment and earnings. Handbook of Labor Economics (Vol. 4) (pp. 1043-1171). Elsevier. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
2. Arrow, K.J. (1998). What has economics to say about racial discrimination? Journal of economic perspectives, 12(2), 91-100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
3. Autor, D.H., Katz, L.F., Kearney, M.S. (2008). Trends in US wage inequality: Revising the revisionists. The Review of economics and statistics, 90(2), 300-323. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
4. Becker, G.S. (2010). The economics of discrimination. University of Chicago press. 178 p. [Google Scholar]
5. Bertrand, M., Mullainathan, S. (2004). Are Emily and Greg more employable than Lakisha and Jamal? A field experiment on labor market discrimination. American economic review, 94(4), 991-1013. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
6. Beyer, H., Rojas, P., Vergara, R. (1999). Trade liberalization and wage inequality. Journal of Development Economics, 59(1). 103-123. [Google Scholar]
7. Bisin, A., Gottardi, P. (2006). Efficient competitive equilibria with adverse selection. Journal of political Economy, 114(3), 485-516. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
8. Blau, F.D., Kahn, L.M. (1996). International differences in male wage inequality: institutions versus market forces. Journal of political Economy, 104(4), 791-837. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
9. Boeri, T., Ours, Van J. (2013). The Economics of Imperfect Labor Markets. Princeton University Press. [Google Scholar]
10. Brown, R. (2011). Prejudice: Its social psychology. John Wiley & Sons. 368 p. [Google Scholar]
11. Calvo-Armengol, A., Jackson, M.O. (2004). The effects of social networks on employment and inequality. American economic review, 94(3), 426-454. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
12. Card, D. (2001). The effect of unions on wage inequality in the US labor market. Industrial and Labor Relations Review, 54(2), 296-315. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
13. Croson, R., Gneezy, U. (2009). Gender Differences in Preferences. Journal of Economic literature, 47(2), 448-474. [Google Scholar]
14. David, A., Dorn, D. (2013). The growth of low-skill service jobs and the polarization of the US labor market. American economic review, 103(5), 1553-1597. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
15. Delgado, R., Stefancic, J. (2017). Critical race theory: An introduction. New York University Press. 208 p. [Google Scholar]
16. Fortin, N.M., Lemieux, T. (1997). Institutional changes and rising wage inequality: Is there a linkage? Journal of economic perspectives, 11(2), 75-96. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
17. Freeman, R.B., Katz, L.F. (1994). Rising Wage Inequality:The United States vs. Other Advanced In: Freeman RB Working Under Different Rules. New York: Russell Sage Foundation. pp. 29-62. [Google Scholar]
18. Glaeser, E.L., Resseger, M.G. (2010). The Complementarity Between Cities and Skills. Journal of Regional Science, 50(1), 221-244. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
19. Guerrieri, V., Shimer, R., Wright, R. (2010). Adverse selection in competitive search equilibrium. Econometrica, 78(6), 1823-1862. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
20. Hammond, T., Streeter, D.W. (1994). Overcoming barriers: Early African American certified public accountants. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 19(3), 271-288. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
21. Harrison, G.W., List, J.A. (2004). Field experiments. Journal of Economic literature, 42(4), 1009-1055. [Google Scholar]
22. Heckman, J.J. (1998). Detecting discrimination. Journal of economic perspectives, 12(2), 101-116. [Google Scholar]
23. Huang, G., Fowler, C.J., Baskerville, R.F. (2016). Entering the accounting profession: the operationalization of ethnicity-based discrimination. Accounting. Auditing & Accountability Journal, 29(8), 1342-1366. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
24. Jones, C.I., Kim, J. (2018). A Schumpeterian model of top income inequality. Journal of political Economy, 126(5), 1785-1826. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
25. Juhn, C., Murphy, K.M., Pierce, B. (1993). Wage inequality and the rise in returns to skill. Journal of political Economy, 101(3), 410-442. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
26. Koeniger, W., Leonardi, M., Nunziata, L. (2007). Labor market institutions and wage inequality. Industrial and Labor Relations Review, 60(3), 340-356. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
27. Lambert, P.J., Aronson, J.R. (1993). Inequality decomposition analysis and the Gini coefficient revisited. The Economic Journal, 103(420), 1221-1227. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
28. Lemieux, T., MacLeod, W.B. (2009). Performance pay and wage inequality. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 124(1), 1-49. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
29. Levine, D.I. (1991). Just-cause employment policies in the presence of worker adverse selection. Journal of Labor Economics, 9(3), 294-305. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
30. Ma, C.A. (1991). Adverse selection in dynamic moral hazard. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 106(1), 255-275. [Google Scholar]
31. Milanovic, B. (1997). A simple way to calculate the Gini coefficient, and some implications. Economics Letters, 56(1), 45-49. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
32. Moretti, E. (2012). The New Geography of Jobs. Houghton Mifflin Harcourt. 304 p. [Google Scholar]
33. Moretti, E. (2013). Real wage inequality. American Economic Journal: Applied Economics, 5(1), 65-103. [Google Scholar]
34. Nance, J.P., Madsen, P.E. (2014). An Empirical Analysis of Diversity in the Legal Profession. L. Rev., 47, 271. [Google Scholar]
35. Pager, D., Shepherd, H. (2008). The sociology of discrimination: Racial discrimination in employment, housing, credit, and consumer markets. Annual Review of Sociology, 34(1), 181-209. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
36. Phelps, E.S. (1972). The statistical theory of racism and sexism. The American Economic Review, 62(4), 659-661. [Google Scholar]
37. Ruggles, S., Flood, S., Foster, S., Goeken, R., Pacas, J., Schouweiler, M., Sobek, M. (2021). IPUMS USA: Version 11.0 [dataset]. Minneapolis, MN: IPUMS. [CrossRef]
38. Song, J., Price, D.J., Guvenen, F., Bloom, N. (2019). Firming up inequality. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 134(1), 1-50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
39. Yitzhaki, S. (1979). Relative deprivation and the Gini coefficient. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 93(2), 321-324. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]