Contents |
Authors:
Hanna Shvindina, ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0883-8361 American University Kyiv, SBA, Ukraine; Doctor of Economics, Professor, Oleg Balatskyi Department of Management, BiEM, Sumy State University, Ukraine Inna Balahurovska, ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3642-9506 PhD Student, Oleg Balatskyi Department of Management, BiEM, Sumy State University, Ukraine Iryna Heiets, ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1267-3790 PhD, Associate Professor, RMIT University, Australia
Pages: 25-32
Language: English
DOI: https://doi.org/10.21272/bel.6(1).25-32.2022
Received: 25.01.2022
Accepted: 16.03.2022
Published: 29.03.2022
Download: |
Views: |
Downloads: |
|
|
|
Abstract
As a social phenomenon and a mechanism for influencing others, leadership always has interested scientists. Literary reviews on the theoretical foundations, types of classifications, and prospects for leadership development are an essential element of careful study of this concept. Today, the systematization of types of leadership on various grounds is a necessary component for understanding the nature of this phenomenon. The paper analyzes 2,000 published research papers from the Scopus database, identifying critical terms related to leadership. Establishing links between leadership and related concepts creates the most accurate picture for further research on this topic. The study is devoted to studying the theoretical and practical experience of scientists worldwide who research management as a critical aspect in building an effective organization. Systematization of such data is the basis for identifying current and fundamentally new directions of effective leadership. The keyword in the described bibliometric analysis was the concept of “leadership”. New clusters have been formed with the most influential definitions of transformational leadership, communication, and shared leadership. The combination of quantitative and qualitative research methods determined the future directions of study in the further search for effective leadership tools. The content analysis of the most cited scientific works was carried out in the research, which reveals the essence of tools for the development of effective leadership and the need for timely diagnosis of the negative behavior of managers. Bibliometric analysis and analysis of the development of leadership theory reveal the need to implement the principles of Network Leadership Theory in modern organizations, which are the basis of the state’s economic development as a whole.
Keywords: Bibliometric Analysis, Leadership, Network Leadership Theory, Transformational Leadership, Shared Leader, Communication.
JEL Classification: M00, M12, M53, M54.
Cite as: Shvindina, H., Balahurovska, I., Heiets, I. (2022). Network Leadership Theory: A New Research Agenda. Business Ethics and Leadership, 6(1), 25-32. https://doi.org/10.21272/bel.6(1).25-32.2022
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
References
- Bailey, C., Madden, A., Alfes, K., & Fletcher, L. (2015). The Meaning, Antecedents and Outcomes of Employee Engagement: A Narrative Synthesis. International Journal of Management Reviews, 19(1), 31-53. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- De Veirman, M., Cauberghe, V., & Hudders, L. (2017). Marketing through Instagram influencers: the impact of number of followers and product divergence on brand attitude. International Journal of Advertising, 36(5), 798-828. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Deci, E.L., Olafsen, A.H., & Ryan, R.M. (2017). Self-Determination Theory in Work Organizations: The State of a Science. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, 4(1), 19-43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dong, Y., Bartol, K.M., Zhang, Z.X., & Li, C. (2016). Enhancing employee creativity via individual skill development and team knowledge sharing: Influences of dual-focused transformational leadership. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 38(3), 439-458. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Donthu, N., & Gustafsson, A. (2020). Effects of COVID-19 on business and research. Journal of Business Research, 117, 284-289. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Eva, N., Robin, M., Sendjaya, S., van Dierendonck, D., & Liden, R.C. (2019). Servant Leadership: A systematic review and call for future research. The Leadership Quarterly, 30(1), 111-132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hoch, J.E., Bommer, W.H., Dulebohn, J.H., & Wu, D. (2016). Do Ethical, Authentic, and Servant Leadership Explain Variance Above and Beyond Transformational Leadership? A Meta-Analysis. Journal of Management, 44(2), 501-529. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hughes, D.J., Lee, A., Tian, A.W., Newman, A., & Legood, A. (2018). Leadership, creativity, and innovation: A critical review and practical recommendations. The Leadership Quarterly, 29(5), 549-569. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kim, A., Kim, Y., Han, K., Jackson, S.E., & Ployhart, R.E. (2014). Multilevel Influences on Voluntary Workplace Green Behavior: Individual Differences, Leader Behavior, and Coworker Advocacy. Journal of Management, 43(5), 1335-1358. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kowalkowski, C., Gebauer, H., Kamp, B., & Parry, G. (2017). Servitization and deservitization: Overview, concepts, and definitions. Industrial Marketing Management, 60, 4-10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kurtessis, J.N., Eisenberger, R., Ford, M.T., Buffardi, L.C., Stewart, K.A., & Adis, C.S. (2015). Perceived Organizational Support: A Meta-Analytic Evaluation of Organizational Support Theory. Journal of Management, 43(6), 1854-1884. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lee, K. & Malerba, F. (2017). Catch-up cycles and changes in industrial leadership: Windows of opportunity and responses of firms and countries in the evolution of sectoral systems. Research Policy, 46(2), 338-351. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Levecque, K., Anseel, F., De Beuckelaer, A., Van der Heyden, J., & Gisle, L. (2017). Work organization and mental health problems in PhD students. Research Policy, 46(4), 868-879. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Luthans, F. & Youssef-Morgan, C.M. (2017). Psychological Capital: An Evidence-Based Positive Approach. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, 4(1), 339-366. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mackey, J.D., Frieder, R.E., Brees, J.R., & Martinko, M.J. (2015). Abusive Supervision: A Meta-Analysis and Empirical Review. Journal of Management, 43(6), 1940-1965. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- McGuinness, P.B., Vieito, J.P., & Wang, M. (2017). The role of board gender and foreign ownership in the CSR performance of Chinese listed firms. Journal of Corporate Finance, 42, 75-99. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Miron-Spektor, E., Ingram, A., Keller, J., Smith, W.K., & Lewis, M.W. (2018). Microfoundations of Organizational Paradox: The Problem Is How We Think about the Problem. Academy of Management Journal, 61(1), 26-45. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Singh, S.K., Giudice, M.D., Chierici, R., & Graziano, D. (2020). Green innovation and environmental performance: The role of green transformational leadership and green human resource management. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 150, 119762. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tepper, B.J., Simon, L., & Park, H.M. (2017). Abusive Supervision. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, 4(1), 123-152. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Williams, T.A., Gruber, D.A., Sutcliffe, K.M., Shepherd, D.A., & Zhao, E.Y. (2017). Organizational Response to Adversity: Fusing Crisis Management and Resilience Research Streams. Academy of Management Annals, 11(2), 733-769. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
|