Contents |
Authors:
Mykola Melnyk, ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6244-5190 Master in International Business, Kozminski University, Warsaw, Poland Mykyta Kuchkin, ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6125-2701 Master of Management, Kozminski University, Warsaw, Poland Andriy Blyznyukov, ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2385-9841 Master of Finance and Accounting, Warsaw School of Economics, Warsaw, Poland
Pages: 127-135
Language: English
DOI: https://doi.org/10.21272/bel.6(2).127-135.2022
Received: 28.04.2022
Accepted: 01.06.2022
Published: 30.06.2022
Download: |
Views: |
Downloads: |
|
|
|
Abstract
With the rapid development of digital technology, a wide range of academic fields is devoting an increasing amount of attention to the study of “digital citizen building”, often known as “DC”. Despite the widespread use of the word, academics are free to define DC in any way they think proper. The primary emphasis of this extensive inquiry is an in-depth examination of every book that has ever been written about DC themes and values. Journal articles that other researchers have evaluated made up 114 of the total. The topic of education is mentioned in more than half of the entries on the list. Even while each major DC notion was welcomed by its specific disc method, they all had one thing in common: a storm. Concerns raised by participants and prior research on the DC study were considered in these outcomes. The difficulty is that there is a significant shortage of research information on young children, as well as a deficiency in the use of conventional methods of research that are relevant to developmental cohesion. According to the findings of the current integrated study, collaboration across different racial groups is necessary to solve both policy and operational challenges in the District of Columbia research community.
Keywords: Digital Citizenship, Conceptualization, Measurement, Digital Technology, Digital Economy.
JEL Classification: M10, M21.
Cite as: Melnyk, M., Kuchkin, M., Blyznyukov, A. (2022). Conceptualization and Measuring the Digital Economy. Business Ethics and Leadership, 6(2), 127-135. https://doi.org/10.21272/bel.6(2).127-135.2022
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
References
- Abowitz, K., & Harnish, J. (2006). Contemporary discourses of citizenship. Review of Educational Research, 76(4), 653-690. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bahl, M. (2016). The Work Ahead: The Future of Businesses and Jobs in Asia Pacific’s Digital Economy, Cognizant, Chennai. Available at: [Link]
- Beerepoot, N. & Lambregts, B. (2015). Competition in online job marketplaces. Global Networks, 15(2), 236-255. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Brynjolfsson, E. & Kahin, B. (eds) (2000a). Understanding the Digital Economy: Data, Tools, and Research, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA. 372 p. [Google Scholar]
- Cooper, H. (1998). Synthesizing research: A guide for literature reviews. In Applied social research methods series (3rd ed., Vol. 2). Sage Publications. 201 p. [Google Scholar]
- Dahlman, C., Mealy, S., & Wermelinger, M. (2016). Harnessing the Digital Economy for Developing Countries, OECD, Paris. Available at: [Link]
- Geissbauer, R., Vedso, J., & Schrauf, S. (2016). Industry 4.0: Building the Digital Enterprise, PwC, London. Available at: [Link]
- Handel, M. (2015). The Effects of Information and Communication Technology on Employment, Skills, and Earnings in Developing Countries, background paper for the World Development Report 2016, World Bank, Washington, DC. Available at: [Link]
- Heeks, R. (2016). Examining “Digital Development”, Development Informatics Working Paper 64, University of Manchester, UK. Available at: [Link]
- Heeks, R. (2017). Information and Communication Technology for Development, Routledge, Abingdon, UK. 428 p. Available at: [Link]
- Hobbs, R. & Jensen, A. (2009). The past, present, and future of media literacy education. Journal of Media Literacy Education, 1(1). [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Institute, D.Q. (2019). DQ global standards report 2019: Common framework for digital literacy, skills and readiness. Available at: [Link]
- Isin, E. & Ruppert, E. (2015). Being digital citizens. Rowman & Littlefield International.
- Ivanova, V.V. (2009). Informatsiinyi rynok: zarubizhni i ukrainski realii (Information market: foreign and Ukrainian realities). Actual problems of economics, 2, 39-43. Available at: [Link]
- Jorgenson, D.W. (2001). Information technology and the U.S. economy. Am. Econ. Rev. 91(1), 1-32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kurzweil, R. (2001). The law of accelerating returns. Available at: [Link]
- Lehdonvirta, V. (2016). Global online labour markets, paper presented at 3rd ISA Forum of Sociology. Vienna, 1-14 Jul. Available at: [Link]
- Laure Lu Chen, Sheena Mirpuri, Nirmala Rao, Nancy Law (2021). Conceptualization and measurement of digital citizenship across disciplines. Educational Research Review, 33, 100379. [CrossRef]
- Lehr, C., Hansen, A., Sinclair, M., & Christenson, S. (2003). Moving beyond dropout towards school completion: An integrative review of data-based interventions. School Psychology Review, 32(3), 342-364. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- McCosker, A., Vivienne, S., & Johns, A. (2016). Negotiating digital citizenship: Control, contest and culture. Rowman & Littlefield. 292 p. Available at: [Link]
- Moher, D., Liberati, A., Tetzlaff, J., Altman, D.G., & Group, P. (2009). Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: The PRISMA statement. Annals of Internal Medicine, 151(4), 264-269. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mossberger, K., Tolbert, C., & Mcneal, R. (2007). Digital citizenship: The internet, society, and participation. MIT Press. 240 p. [Google Scholar]
- OECD (2015). OECD Digital Economy Outlook 2015, OECD, Paris. Available at: [Link]
- Quinones, G., Nicholson, B. & Heeks, R. (2015). A literature review of e-entrepreneurship in emerging economies. Entrepreneurship in BRICS, R.L. La Rovere, L. de M. Ozório, & L. de J. Melo (eds), Springer, Cham, Switzerland, 179-208. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ribble, M. & Bailey, G. (2007). Digital citizenship in schools (1st ed.). International Society for Technology in Education. 149 p. Available at: [Link]
- Ribble, M. & Miller, T.N. (2013). Educational leadership in an online world: Connecting students to technology responsibly, safely, and ethically. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 17(1), 137-145. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ribble, M. (2012). Digital citizenship for educational change. Kappa Delta Pi Record, 48(4), 148-151. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rifkin, J. (2011). The third industrial revolution: how lateral power is transforming energy, the economy, and the world. Palgrave Macmillan, New York. Available at: [Link]
- Rodrik, D. (2016). Premature deindustrialization. Journal of Economic Growth, 21(1), 1-33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sulosaari, V., Suhonen, R., & Leino-Kilpi, H. (2011). An integrative review of the literature on registered nurses’ medication competence: Registered nurses’ medication competence. Journal of Clinical Nursing, 20(3-4), 464-478. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Torraco, R.J. (2005). Writing integrative literature reviews: Guidelines and examples. Human Resource Development Review, 4(3), 356-367. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- WEF (2015). Expanding Participation and Boosting Growth: The Infrastructure Needs of the Digital Economy, World Economic Forum, Geneva. Available at: [Link]
- Whittemore, R. & Knafl, K. (2005). The integrative review: Updated methodology. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 52(5), 546-553. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
|