Abstract

Given that voting is the bedrock of any functional democracy, it is an intriguing puzzle as to why many eligible voters often choose not to vote. The rational choice theory posits that voters might decide to stay away from voting, especially if they believe that their votes are inconsequential and not enough to change the outcomes of an election, especially involving many unrelated voters. However, other socioeconomic factors may modify that belief as voters may respond to the environment they live in and vote accordingly just to make a statement. Also, affinity to other fellow citizens and the presence of social capital may lead the voters to vote in higher numbers to signal voter solidarity. Using the US Census Bureau’s voting participation and citizenship composition data at the state levels for the year 2020, this paper shows that citizens feel positively inclined to participate in voting if a larger percentage of citizens are registered to vote. Furthermore, controlling for voter registration and regional indicator variables, non-voting (by the registered voters) seems to decline (voting seems to increase) as the percentage of non-citizens increases in the population. The first result seems to point to the non-trivial role played by social capital and voter affinity in increasing turnout, while the second and the key result of this paper seems to indicate that larger immigration numbers may energize the citizens to vote in higher numbers, thereby reducing the percentage of citizens who do not vote. Further evidence regarding regional variations suggests that controlling for voter registration and percentage of non-citizens in the population, non-voting may be lower in the North-Eastern and Western regions of the USA compared to the Southern and Mid-Western regions. Asymmetries in regional immigrations, voter registration and voter engagement present a very interesting dynamism for future elections and public policy formulation in the USA.

Keywords: voting behaviour, immigration, voter absenteeism, regionalism and voting.

JEL Classification: D7, P5.

Cite as: Ray, A. (2022). The Impact of Non-Citizen Population in Regional Differences in Non-Voting in the USA. Business Ethics and Leadership, 6(3), 113-119. https://doi.org/10.21272/bel.6(3).113-119.2022

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License

References

1. Abou-Chadi, T. & Helbling, M. (2018). How immigration reforms affect voting behavior. Political Studies, 66(3), 687-717. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
2. Alford, J.R., Funk, C.L., & Hibbing, J.R. (2005). Are political orientations genetically transmitted? American Political Science Review, 99(2), 153-167. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
3. Evans, J. & Ivaldi, G. (2021). Contextual effects of immigrant presence on populist radical right support: testing the “halo effect” on front national voting in France. Comparative Political Studies, 54(5), 823-854. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
4. Fowler, J.H., Baker, L.A., & Dawes, C.T. (2008). Genetic variation in political participation. American Political Science Review, 102(2), 233-248. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
5. Geys, B. (2006). Explaining voter turnout: A review of aggregate-level research. Electoral Studies, 25(4), 637-663. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
6. Halla, M., Wagner, A.F., & Zweimüller, J. (2017). Immigration and voting for the far right. Journal of the European Economic Association, 15(6), 1341-1385. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
7. Helbling, M. & Leblang, D. (2019). Controlling immigration? How regulations affect migration flows. European Journal of Political Research, 58(1), 248-269. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
8. Helbling, M. & Kalkum, D. (2018). Migration policy trends in OECD countries. Journal of European Public Policy, 25(12), 1779-1797. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
9. Hoekstra, M. & Orozco-Aleman, S. (2021). Illegal Immigration: The Trump Effect (No. w28909). National Bureau of Economic Research. [Google Scholar]
10. Husted, T.A. & Kenny, L.W. (1997). The Effect of the Expansion of the Voting Franchise on the Size of Government. Journal of Political Economy, 105(1), 54-82. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
11. Knack, S. (1992). Civic norms, social sanctions, and voter turnout. Rationality and society, 4(2), 133-156. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
12. Liasson, Mara (2021). Examining The Fault Lines Of The Republican Party. National Public Radio (NPR). Available at: [Link]
13. Laponce, J.A. (1967). Non-voting and non-voters: a typology. Canadian Journal of Economics and Political Science/Revue canadienne de economiques et science politique, 33(1), 75-87. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
14. Matsusaka, J.G. & Palda, F. (1999). Voter turnout: How much can we explain? Public choice, 98(3), 431-446. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
15. Montanaro, D. (2020). Despite Record Turnout, 80 Million Americans Didn’t Vote. Here’s Why. National Public Radio. Available at: [Link]
16. Moriconi, S., Peri, G., & Turati, R. (2019). Immigration and voting for redistribution: Evidence from European elections. Labour Economics, 61, 101765. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
17. Silver, M. (1973). A demand analysis of voting costs and voting participation. Social Science Research, 2(2), 111-124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
18. Van der Brug, W., Fennema, M., Tillie, J. (2000). Anti-immigrant parties in Europe: Ideological or protest vote? European Journal of Political Research, 37(1), 77-102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
19. Walter, S. (2021). The backlash against globalization. Annual Review of Political Science, 24(1), 421-442. [Google Scholar][CrossRef]