Abstract

The relevance of this scientific problem is that there are numerous calls and arguments from civil society organisations, labour unions, progressive economists, and policy experts to the South African government regarding the introduction of basic income grant. This will help protect the unemployed from poverty and stimulate economic growth. Systematization of the literary sources and approaches for solving the problem of improving the quality of life of the poor indicates that the government (led by the African National Congress) since 1994 implemented a social security policy (the child support grant for women). At the same time, the government’s position regarding the feasibility of introducing of basic income grant as a tool for economic stimulation has changed. The African National Congress disagrees with the need for basic income grant as a tool for poverty alleviation and economic growth. The main purpose of the research is the analysis of the prerequisites for the change in the position of the African National Congress regarding the feasibility of introducing basic income grant: basic income grant is a tool for stimulating economic growth and overcoming poverty for most of the disadvantaged population of South Africa, or a means for the government to preserve its positions, which are weakening among the South African electorate. The paper presents the results of an empirical analysis, which proved that basic income grant will contribute to the increase of the national tax base as those not earning an income can start buying and selling goods and be taxed. At the same time, at the initial stage, the introduction of basic income grant will lead to an increase in the level of income taxation of the employed population. Analytical methods of scientific literature analysis became the methodical tools of the conducted research. The research empirically confirms and theoretically proves that the introduction of basic income grant could stimulate the economy by ensuring that the unemployed become economic participants by having disposable cash to spend and start business activities.

Keywords: basic income grant, disposable income, job creation, socio-economic stimulus, social security, South Africa, unemployment.

JEL Classification: A13, D19, D60.

Cite as: Makole, K.R., Ntshangase, B.A., Maringa, M.S., & Msosa, S.K. (2022). Can a Basic Income Grant Improve the Quality of Life for the Poor in South Africa: An Analytical Review. Business Ethics and Leadership, 6(3), 57-67. https://doi.org/10.21272/bel.6(3).57-67.2022

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License

References

1. African National Congress (1994). National Election Manifesto: Together we have won the right for all South African to vote.Johannesburg. Available at: [Link]
2. Auditor-General of South Africa (2021). The Citizen’s Report − PFMA 2020-21. Pretoria: Office of the Auditor-General of South Africa. Available at: [Link]
3. Barchiesi, F. (2007). South African debates on the Basic Income Grant: wage labour and the post-apartheid social policy. Journal of Southern African Studies, 33(3), 561-575. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
4. Basic Income Earth Network (BIEN) (2019). What is basic income. Available at: [Link]
5. Basic Income Grant Coalition (2009). Making the difference! The BIG in Namibia. Basic Income Grant Pilot Project Assessment Report. Available at: [Link]
6. Baumann, B.A. & Gallagher, K.P. (2013). Post-crisis account regulation in South Korea and South Africa. Available at: [Link]
7. Benstein, A. (2022). A BIG will lead to crippling tax. Available at: [Link]
8. Bowen, G.A. (2009). Document analysis as a qualitative research method. Qualitative Research Journal, 9(2), 27-40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
9. Braun, V. & Clarke, V. (2013). Successful qualitative research: A practical guide for beginners. London: Sage. Available at: [Link]
10. Cedras, J. & Kuye, J.O. (2013). The impact of tripartite politics on the leadership function in public administration. Dialogue between the ANC, COSATU and the SACP in South Africa. African Journal of Public Affairs, 6(3), 97-111. [Google Scholar]
11. Centre for Development Enterprise (2022). Poverty and basic income grant: Six question about a BIG. Available at: [Link]
12. Chen, J. (2021). Economics. Available at: [Link]
13. Constitution SA (1996). Bill of rights. Available at: [Link] 
14. Creswell, J.W. (2013). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (3^rd edn). Thousand Oaks: Sage. Available at: [Link]
15. Crocker, G. (2015). Keynes, Piketty, and Basic Income. Basic Income Studies, 10(1), 91-113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
16. Dercon, S. (2006). Poverty measurement. In D.A. Clark (Ed.), The Elgar companion to development studies. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing. Available at: [Link]
17. Department of Welfare (1997). White Paper for Social Welfare. Pretoria: Department of Welfare. Available at: [Link]
18. Folarin, K. (2021). Poverty and Inequality in South Africa. International Journal of Poverty, Investment and Development, 2(1). [CrossRef]
19. Ford, M. (2015). Rise of the robots: Technology and the threat of a jobless future. New York: Basic Books. Available at: [Link]
20. Frank, R. (2008). Context is more important than Keynes realized. In Pecchi, L. & Piga, G. (Eds.). Revisiting Keynes. Cambridge: MIT Press. [CrossRef]
21. Harman, E. (2006). Can it start small, but end big? Expanding social assistance in South Africa. Human Rights Review, 7(4), 81-99. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
22. Haupt, P. (2006). The SAARF universal living standard measure (SU-LSM): 12 years of continuous development. Available at: [Link]
23. Henderson, T. & Quiggin, J. (2019). Trade unions and basic income. In The Palgrave International Handbook of Basic Income (pp. 493-505). Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. [CrossRef]
24. Ikyoive, J.T. (2022). Investigating Nigerian foreign nationals’ experiences of violence, safety and security on’Point Road’, Durban, South Africa (Doctoral dissertation). Available at: [Link]
25. Institute for Economic Justice (2022). Poverty is unaffordable, there is a way out. Johannesburg: Institute for Economic Justice. Available at: [Link]
26. Isaacs, D. (2008). Omitara goes BIG. In the Namibian. Available at: [Link]
27. John, J.D. & Putzel, J. (2009). Political settlements. Governance and Social Development Research Centre. Available at: [Link]
28. Lansley, S. & Reed, H. (2013). How to boost the wage share. London: Touch Stone Pamphlets. Available at: [Link]
29. Kameeta, Z., Haarmann, C., Haarmann, D., & Jauch, H. (2007). Presentation to the United Nations Commission for Social Development. 45^th session, 7-16 February 2007. “Promoting employment and decent work for all-Towards a good practice model in Namibia” – Research Paper. Available at: [Link]
30. Keynes. J.M. (1936). The general theory of employment, interest, and money (1^st edn.). London: Macmillan. Available at: [Link]
31. Khan, M. H. (2010). Political settlements and the governance of growth-enhancing institutions. Research Paper Series on Governance for Growth. London: School of Oriental and African Studies, University of London. Available at: [Link]
32. Kim, J.Y. (2018). A study of the feasibility of the basic income in Korea (in Korean). Korean Association of IACL, 24(2), 37-73. [CrossRef]
33. Kim, D. & Mah, J.S. (2021). Basic income policy of Korea. Journal of Poverty. Volume, Issue, pages. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
34. Korean Ministry of Employment and Labor (2017). Wages and hours worked by type of employment. Available at: [Link]
35. Lavers, T. & Hickey, S. (2016). Conceptualising the politics of social protection expansion in low income countries: The intersection of transnational ideas and domestic politics. International Journal of Social Welfare, 25(4), 388-398. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
36. Maltzahn, R. & Durrheim, K. (2008). Is poverty multidimensional? A comparison of income and asset based measures in five Southern African countries. Social Indicators Research, 86, 149-162. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
37. Mlaba, K. (2021). Poverty, Inequality and Looting: Everything You Need to Know About South Africa’s Protests. Available at: [Link]
38. Nattrass, N. (2000). Inequality, unemployment and wage selling institutions in South Africa. Studies in Economics and Econometrics, 24(3), 129-141. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
39. Olaitan, O.O., Issah, M., & Wayi, N. (2021). A framework to test South Africa’s readiness for the fourth industrial revolution. South African Journal of Information Management, 23(1), 1-10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
40. Osterkamp, R. (2008). Basic income grant- A promising way forward? In New Era. Available at: [Link]
41. Parijs, P.V. (2004). Basic income: A simple and powerful idea for the twenty-first century. Politics & Poverty, 32(1), 7-39. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
42. Park, J.Y. & Mah, J.S. (2011). Neo-liberal reform and bipolarization of income in Korea. Journal of Contemporary Asia, 41(2), 249-265. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
43. Patel, L. (2014). Social workers shaping welfare policy in South Africa: The White Paper for Social Welfare and lessons for policy practice. [Google Scholar]
44. Pateman, C. (2004). Democratizing citizenship. Some advantages of a basic income. Politics & Society, 32(1), 89-105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
45. Pecchi, L. & Piga, G. (2010). Revisiting Keynes. Cambridge: MIT Press. Available at: [Link]
46. Piketty, T. (2014). Capital in the twenty-first century. Cambridge: Harvard University Press. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
47. Polamaki, A.P. (2010). Basic income grant in Namibia. Viewpoint on the proposal and on the work of the BIG Coalition. Helsinki: University of Helsinki. [Google Scholar]
48. Prates, D.M. and Fritz, B. (2016). Beyond capital controls: regulation of foreign currency derivatives markets in the Republic of Korea and Brazil after the Global Financial Crisis. Cepal Review. Available at: [Link]
49. Pulkka, V. (2017). A free lunch with robots-can a basic income stabilise the digital economy. Transfer, 23(3), 295-311. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
50. Rapley, T. (2007). Doing conversation, discourse and document analysis. London: Sage. Available at: [Link]
51. Reed, H. & Lansley, S. (2016). Universal basic income: An ideas whose time has come. London: Compass. Available at: [Link]
52. Sachs, M. (2022). Basic income support in SA − What it will take. Johannesburg: The Conversation.
53. Santens, S. (2016). In the 21^st century all roads appear to lead to universal basic income. Medium. Available at: [Link]
54. Satumba, T., Bayat, A., & Mohamed, S. (2017). The impact of social grants on poverty reduction in South Africa. Journal of Economics, 8(1), 33-49. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
55. Seong-kon, S. (2021). What it means to be a developed country. The Korean Herald. Available at: [Link]
56. Seekings, J. & Matisonn, H. (2012). South Africa: The continuing politics of basic income. In Basic Income Worldwide (pp. 128-150). Palgrave Macmillan, London. [CrossRef]
57. Seung-Hun, C. (2007). Spiritual modernisation and rural development − applicability of Korea’s development to Africa. Unpublished conference paper.
58. Shejavali, N. (2009). BIG is no joke, says BIG. In the Namibian. Available at: [Link]
59. Son, A.S. (2017). How is the youth dividend policy of seongnam city made and executed? -Focused on a Partisan theory (in Korean). The Journal of Asiatic Studies, 60(1), 50-102. Available at: [Link]
60. South African Human Rights Commission (2018). Basic Income Grant. Policy Brief. Johannesburg: South African Human Rights. Available at: [Link]
61. South African Presidency (1994). White Paper on Reconstruction and Development. Cape Town: Republic of South Africa. Available at: [Link]
62. Standing, G. (2004). About time: Basic income security as a right. In G. Standing (ed.), 1-40. Cape Town: University of Cape Town Press. [Google Scholar]
63. Standing, G. and Samson, M. eds. (2003). A basic income grant for South Africa. Juta and Company Ltd. [Google Scholar]
64. Statistics SA (2021a). A statistical summary of social grants in South Africa – fact sheet 10. Pretoria. Available at: [Link]
65. Statistics South Africa (2021b). South Africa unemployment rate 2021 Data/2022 Forecast 2000-2022 Historical. Pretoria: Statistics South Africa. Available at: [Link]
66. Sunday Times (2022). Magical thinking about the BIG question does more harm than good. Johannesburg: Tiso Blackstar Group. Available at: [Link]
67. Taylor Committee (2002). Inquiry into a Comprehensive System of Social Security in South Africa. Transferring the Present – Protecting the Future. Consolidated Report, March. Available at: [Link]
68. Tax Foundation (2022). Tax Policy 101. Available at: [Link]
69. Tjaronda, W. (2007). UN commends BIG proposals. In New Era. Available at: [Link]
70. Trading Economics (2018). South Korea consumer price index (CPI). Available at: [Link]  
71. United Nations (2007). Commission for Social Development, Final Report on the forty-fifth session. Available at: [Link]
72. United Nations Development Programme (UNDP) (2005). Human development report 2005. New York: UNDP document. Available at: [Link]
73. van de Walle, N. (2007). The path from neopatrimonialism: Democracy and clientelism in Africa today. Working Paper 2007.03. Ithaca, NY: Mario Einaudi Center for International Studies, Cornell University. Available at: [Link]
74. Wessels, D. (1999). South Africa’s Reconstruction and Development Programme: “A better life for all”. Journal of Social Science, 3(4), 235-243. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
75. World Bank (2022). New World Bank Report assesses sources of inequality in five countries in southern Africa. Available at: [Link]
76. Zwane, T. (2021). At 74%, SA’s youth unemployment is a ‘catastrophe. Available at: [Link]