Abstract

Coalition governance in South Africa is adjudged as an opportunity for nation-building and social compact, which intends to jettison the apartheid legacy of racial and social separation. Coalition governance in South Africa quintessentially demonstrates a maturing nation-building project whereby political parties embrace a cohesive spirit for democratic governance and citizenship representation. However, the lack of consensus about a developmental posture to drive nation-building in South Africa put different political parties on antithetical dissimulations that undermine effective coalition governance in both national and local governmental spheres. An era of dominant party hegemony is approaching its final demise, which challenges political parties to build workable and collaborative consensus toward leading South Africa out of its current developmental stagnation. The study examines the challenges and opportunities of coalition governance in South Africa. The objective of the paper is to understand how coalition building can be a leverage for Nation building in the context of South African political structure. A qualitative study is undertaken by analyzing strategic and policy documents of political parties and journal articles to examine challenges and opportunities for coalition governance in South Africa. The thematic content analysis examines emerging patterns from primary and secondary documentary sources to generate relevant themes that influence and guide conceptualization, challenges, and opportunities for coalition governance in South Africa. Findings revealed that a major challenge for coalition governance in South Africa is political brinkmanship by political parties who negotiate in bad faith, demanding more concessions than votes garnered from election results, which demonstrates political immaturity. However, a positive aspect of coalition governance might be for parties to formalize binding coalition agreements that can serve as conflict management mechanisms that can compel parties to demonstrate reciprocal accountability during governance.

Keywords: coalition agreement, coalition governance, control mechanism, ideological and ethno-cultural tension, political brinkmanship, social cohesion, South Africa.

JEL Classification: L38, R38.

Cite as: Makole, K.R., Ntshangase, B.A., & Adewumi, S.A. (2022). Coalition Governance: Unchartered Waters in South African Political Landscape. Business Ethics and Leadership, 6(4), 23-37. https://doi.org/10.21272/bel.6(4).23-37.2022

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License

References

1. Adam, H. (1995). The politics of ethnic identity: Comparing South Africa. Ethnic and Racial Studies, 18(3), 457-475. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
2. Adamolekun, L. (1986). Politics and administration in Nigeria. Ibadan: Spectrum Books. p. 23. Available at: [Link]
3. Andeweg, R.B., & Timmermans, A. (2008). Conflict management in coalition government. In: Storm, K, Muller, WC and Bergman, T (eds). Cabinets and coalition bargaining: The democratic life cycle in Western Europe. Oxford: Oxford University Press. p. 31. Available at: [Link]
4. African National Congress (2017). 54th National Conference: Report and resolutions. Johannesburg: African National Congress Document. Available at: [Link]
5. Back, H., Debus, M., & Dumont, P. (2011). Who gets what in coalition governments? Predictors of portfolio allocation in parliamentary democracies. European Journal of Political Research, 50, 441-478. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
6. Bandyopadhyay, S., & Oak, M. (2004). Party formation and coalition bargaining in a model of proportional representation. Department of Economics, University of Birmingham, United Kingdom and Williams College, Williamson Town. Available at: [Link]
7. Basak, D., & Deb, J. (2020). Gambling over public opinion. American Economic Review, 110(11), 3492-3521. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
8. Bennet, G. (1963). Kenya: A political history. London: OUP. Available at: [Link]
9. Booysen, S. (2018). Coalition and alliances demarcate cross-roads in ANC trajectories. The New Agenda, 68, 6-10. Available at: [Link]
10. Booysen, S (ed). (2012). Local elections in South Africa: parties, people, politics. Stellenbosch: Sun Press with Konrad Adenhauer Stiftung. 388 p. [Google Scholar]
11. Bradshaw, G., & Breakfast, N. (2019). Mediating coalition politics at the local government level in South Africa, 2016-2019. Special Issue: 123-139. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
12. Creswell, J.W. (2013). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches(3^rd ed.). Thousand Oaks: Sage. 488 p. [Google Scholar]
13. Creswell, J.W., & Miller, D. (2000). Determining validity in qualitative inquiry. Theory into Practice, 39(3), 124-130. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
14. Davis, R. (2019). Peter Marias and the Freedom Front Plus: A match made in opportunists’ heaven. The Daily Maverick, 22 January. Available at: [Link]
15. Democratic Alliance (2021). The DA’s 2021 local government election manifesto-Documents/Politicsweb. Available at: [Link]
16. Economic Freedom Fighters (2013). Economic Freedom Fighters Founding Manifesto: Radical Movement towards Economic Freedom in our Lifetime. Rustenburg: Economic Freedom Fighters Document. Available at: [Link]
17. Economic Freedom Fighters (2021). 2021 Local government elections manifesto-EFF. Available at: [Link]
18. Electoral Commission of South Africa (2016). Detailed results data: 2016 Municipal elections-Electoral Commission of South Africa. Available at: [Link]
19. Electoral Commission of South Africa (2021). 2021 Municipal Elections-Electoral Commission of South Africa. Available at: [Link]
20. ENCA News (2021). Steinhuisen update on coalition talks. ENCA News, 11 November. Johannesburg: ENCA. Available at: [Link]
21. Falco-Gimeno, A. (2014). The use of control mechanisms in coalition governments: The role of preference tangentiality and repeated interactions. Party Politics, 20(3), 341-356. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
22. Fisher, R., & Ury, W. (1981). Getting to yes, negotiating agreements without giving in. Boston: Houghton Mifflin. Available at: [Link]
23. Friendman, B. (2021). Cape Independence Party on why a referendum to exit SA is possible. CapeTalk, 567AM, 1 October. Available at: [Link]
24. Gumede, W. (2021). New laws needed to make political coalition work. Sunday Times, 5 December, p.22. [CrossRef]
25. Hanabe, L.D., & Malinzi, U. (2019). Party coalition as a model to govern municipalities in South Africa. Journal Administration, 54(1), 41-51. [Google Scholar]
26. Harper, P. (2020). High court overturns decisions to place Tshwane metro under administration. Mail & Guardian, 29 December. Available at: [Link]
27. Hatch, J.A. (2002). Doing qualitative research in educational settings. Albany: State University of New York Press. Available at: [Link]
28. Indradason, I.H., & Kristinsson, G.A. (2013). Making words count: Coalition agreements and cabinet management. European Journal of Political Research, 52, 822-846. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
29. Johnson, R. (1994). South Africa on the eve. London Book Review, 16(8), 3-6. [Google Scholar]
30. Jolobe, Z. (2007). Things fall apart, can the centre hold? The state of coalition politics in the Cape Metropolitan. In S. Buhlungu, J.Daniel, R. Southall and J. Lutchman (eds), State of the Nation: South Africa 2006-07. Cape Town: HSRC Press, 78-92. Available at: [Link]
31. Kadima, D. (2003). Political party coalition building and splitting in post-apartheid South Africa: Effects on representative democracy and party system. Paper presented at Electoral Institute of Southern Africa (EISA) Roundtable on political party coalitions: Strengthening democracy through party coalition building. Claremont, Cape Town. Available at: [Link]
32. Kluver, H., & Back, H. (2019). Coalition agreement, issue attention, and cabinet governance. Comparative Political Studies, 52(13-14), 1995-2031. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
33. Kluver, H., & Spoon, J.J. (2016). Who responds? Voters, parties, and issues attention. British Journal of Political Science, 46, 633-654. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
34. Karume, S. (2003). Conceptual understanding of political coalitions in South Africa: An integration of concepts and practice. Paper presented at Electoral Institute of Southern Africa (EISA) Roundtable on political party coalitions: Strengthening democracy through party coalition building. Claremont, Cape Town. [Google Scholar]
35. Kyle, K. (1999). The politics of independent Kenya. Hampshire: Macmillan. Available at: [Link]
36. Louw, E.P. (1994). Shifting patterns of political discourse in the new South Africa. Critical Studies in Mass Communication, 11, 22-53. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
37. Low, D. (1971). Buganda in modern history. London: Weidenfeld and Nicolson. Available at: [Link]
38. Makole, K.R. (2021). From Cadre deployment to professionalizing public service in South Africa: A reflective approach to service delivery. African Journal of Development Studies, 3(4), 110-129. [Google Scholar]
39. Mandaza, I. (1986). The state politics in the post-white settler colonial situation. Dakar: CODESRIA. Available at: [Link]
40. Mansbridge, J., & Martin, C.J. (2013). Negotiating agreement in politics: Report of the task force on negotiating agreement in politics.Washington, DC: American Political Science Association. Available at: [Link]
41. Marshall, C., & Rossman, G.B. (2011). Designing qualitative research(5^th ed.). Thousand Oaks: Sage. Available at: [Link]
42. Masipa, T.T. (2016). The rise of multi-partyism in South Africa’s political spectrum: The age of coalition and party alliances. Available at: [Link]
43. Martin, L.W., & Van Berg, G. (2005). Parliaments and coalitions: The role of legislative institutions in multiparty governance. New York: Oxford University Press. Available at: [Link]
44. Mavuso, S., & Sadike, M. (2022). ANC factional battles alive as structure hosts suspended Ace Magashule in Polokwane, 06 January. IOL. Available at: [Link]  
45. McClellan, J. (2000). Web versus high street. The Guardian On Line, 27 January: 10. Available at: [Link]
46. Miles, M.B., & Huberman, A.M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis. 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications. Available at: [Link]
47. Mokgosi, K., Shai, K., & Ogunnubi, O. (2017). Local government coalition in Gauteng province of South Africa: Challenges and opportunities. Journal of Conflict and Social Transformation, 6(1), 37-57. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
48. Moore, C. (1986). The mediation process: Practical strategies for resolving conflict. San Francisco: Jossey Bass. [CrossRef]
49. Muller, W.C., & Meyer, T. (2010). Meeting the challenges of representation and accountability in multiparty governments. Western European Politics, 33, 1065-1092. [CrossRef]
50. Newsroom (2019). City restores workers’ dignity by insourcing over 1500 cleaners. Available at: [Link]
51. News24 (2021a). Eight days in July: Inside the unrest and looting that shock South Africa. Available at: [Link]  
52. News24 (2021b). Local government election 2021-News24. Available at: [Link]
53. News24 (2021c). Eff warns fight for land has only begun after National Assembly fails to pass constitutional amendment, 08 December. Available at: [Link]  
54. Ngwane, T. (2019). Insurgent democracy: Post-apartheid South Africa’s freedom fighters. Journal of Southern African Studies, 45(1), 229-245. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
55. Nyenhuis, R. (2020). The political struggle for ‘the people’: Populist discourse in the 2019 South African elections. Commonwealth & Comparative Politics, 58(4), 409-432. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
56. Oyovbaire, S. (1985). Federalism in Nigeria. Hong Kong: Macmillan. Available at: [Link]
57. Oyugi, W.O. (2006). Coalition politics and coalition governments in Africa. Journal of Contemporary African Studies, 24(1), 53-79. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
58. Pieterse, M. (2019). A year of living dangerously? Urban assertiveness, cooperative governance and the first year of three coalition-led, metropolitan municipalities in South Africa. Politikon, 46(1), 51-70. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
59. Polity (2018). EFF: EFF reiterates that it will table a motion of no confidence in Trollip. 2^nd March. Available at: [Link]
60. Republic of South Africa (1996). Constitution of the Republic of South Africa, Act No. 108 of 1996. Pretoria: Government Printer. Available at: [Link]
61. Resnick, D. (2014). Varieties of African populism in comparative practice. In C. de la Torre (Ed.), The promise and perils of populism: Global perspectives (pp.317-348). University of Kentucky Press. Available at: [Link]
62. Rosenberg, M. (2012). Living nonviolent communication: Practical tools to connect and communicate skillfully in every situation. Boulder: Sounds True Inc. Available at: [Link]
63. Shava, E.A., & Chamisa, S.F. (2018). Cadre deployment policy and its effects on performance management in South African local government: A critical review. Politeia, 37(8), 1-18. [Google Scholar]
64. Schaefer, M. (2018). How a coalition government could actually be a success in South Africa. Available at: [Link]
65. Sithole, M. (1986). The general elections: 1979-1985. In I. Mandaza (ed). Zimbabwe: The political economy of transition: 1980-1986. Dakar: CODESRIA. [Google Scholar]
66. Storm, K. (2000). Delegation and accountability in parliamentary democracies. European Journal of Political Research, 37, 261-289. [CrossRef]
67. Timmermans, A., & Gerard, B. (2011). The policy agenda in multiparty government: Coalition agreements and legislative activity in the Netherlands. Paper presented at the ECPR Joint Sessions, St. Gallen, 13-17 April 2011. Available at: [Link]
68. Trochim, W.M.K., & Donnelly, J. (2007). The research methods knowledge base. 3rd ed. Mason, OH: Thomson Custom Publishing. Available at: [Link]
69. Van der Wardt, M., de Vries, C.E., & Hobolt, S.B. (2014). Exploiting the cracks: Wedge issues in multiparty competition. Journal of Politics, 76(4), 986-999. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
70. Volden, C., & Carruba, J. (2004). The formation of oversized coalitions in parliamentary democracies. American Journal of Political Science, 48, 521-537. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
71. Young, C. (1979). The politics of cultural pluralism. Wisconsin: University Wisconsin Press. Available at: [Link]