Abstract

Administrative office employees spend much time confined in their workspaces as they work hard to provide the critical support required for the overall performance of their organizations. As a result, their comfort should be given priority by their organizations, be it private or public. This article investigated the administrative employees’ perceptions of their offices’ physical environment comfort in a public university. Different aspects of their physical environment, such as furniture, noise, office temperature, lighting and space, were examined as variables influencing their performance. The systematization of literary sources for solving the problem of arranging a comfortable physical environment in private organizations proved a significant dependence of the productivity of employees on the physical environment in which they perform their duties. However, there is the scarcity of research conducted in a public organization, especially in the higher education sector. The methodological tool of the research was the method of quantitative analysis, in which a questionnaire was used to collect data from 81 administrative staff of a public university with several campuses in South Africa. The findings indicated that many respondents generally perceived a comfortable physical environment necessary to increase performance. These were, however, not always matched by their perceptions of what transpired at their offices. For instance, 63% of respondents viewed comfortable furniture as critical for the performance of their duties. Nevertheless, only 55% of respondents agreed that their university furniture was comfortable, with 24% disagreeing and 21% taking a neutral stance. The split in perceptions makes it imperative for the university to attend to areas of weakness and inequality in providing physical environment resources. A future study could examine whose offices are more comfortable than others in university contexts. In addition, a promising direction of future research should be the reconciliation of employees’ perception of the comfort of the physical environment in offices with the results of observations. This will enrich the obtained results.

Keywords: administrative staff, comfort, perceptions, performance, physical environment, public university.

JEL Classification: I23, J28, M12.

Cite as: Ngcobo, S., & Mhlanga, J.S. (2022). University Administrative Employees’ Perceptions of Their Offices’ Physical Environment Comfort. Business Ethics and Leadership, 6(4), 61-78. https://doi.org/10.21272/bel.6(4).61-78.2022

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License

References

1. Abun, D., Macaspac, L.G.R., Magallanes, T., Catbagan, N.C., & Mansueto, J.M. (2022). The effect of organizational politics on the individual work performance. International Journal of Research in Business and Social Science, 11(2), 157-171. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
2. Ajala, E.M. (2012). The Influence of workplace environment on workers’ welfare, performance and productivity. The African Symposium: An Online Journal of the African Educational Research Network, 12(1), 141-149. [Google Scholar]
3. Ali, A.S., Chua, S.J., & Lim, M. (2015). The effect of physical environment comfort on employees’ performance in office buildings: A case study of three public universities in Malaysia. Structural Survey, 33, 294-308. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
4. Clippard, M., & Pfnür, A. (2018). The effectiveness of physical office environments for employee outcomes: An interdisciplinary perspective of research efforts. Journal of Corporate Real Estate, 20(1), 56-80. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
5. Arilaha M.A., Fahri, J., Nurlela, A., Jabid, A.W., & Buamonabot, I. (2020). Motivation, physical work environment, non-physical work environment, and work satisfaction (Study on the Government of Ternate City), Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Food, Agriculture and Natural Resources (FANRes 2019), Atlantis Press, 419-423. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
6. Athirah, S., Shifaa, N., Michael, F.L., Sumilan, H., Lim, S.L.O., Jonathan, V., Hamidi, H., & Abg Ahmad, A.I. (2019). The relationship between working environment and employee performance. Journal of Cognitive Sciences and Human Development, 5(2), 14-22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
7. Atika, Q., Qazi, J., Naseer, K., Zeeshan, M., Hardaker, G., Maitama, J.Z., & Haruna, K. (2020). Analyzing situational awareness through public opinion to predict adoption of social distancing amid pandemic COVID-19. Journal of Medical Virology, 92, 7849-7855. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
8. Azeez, M.F., Khudair, F.W., & Al-Fahham, A.A. (2021). Effect of noise on general health status of electrical generator workers in Iraq. Indian Journal of Forensic Medicine & Toxicology, 15(4), 1374-1378. [Google Scholar]
9. Azziz, R., Hentschke, G.C., Jacobs, L.A., & Jacobs, B.C. (2019). Strategic mergers in higher education. Johns Hopkins University Press. 304 p. [Google Scholar]
10. Badat, S. (2016). Deciphering the meanings, and explaining the South African higher education student protests of 2015-16. Pax Academica, 1(1), 71-106. [Google Scholar]
11. Baert, S., Lippens, L., Moens, E., Weytjens, J., & Sterkens, P. (2020). The COVID-19 crisis and telework: A research survey on experiences, expectations and hopes. SSRN. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
12. Bashir A., Amir, A., Jawaad, M., & Hasan, T. (2020). Work conditions and job performance: An indirect conditional effect of motivation. Cogent Business & Management, 7(1). [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
13. Boerstra, A.C., te Kulve, M., Toftum, J., Marcel, G.L.C., Loomans, B.W.O., & Hensen, J.L.M. (2015). Comfort and performance impact of personal control over thermal environment in summer: Results from a laboratory study. Building and Environment, 87, 315-326. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
14. Chandra, T. & Priyono, P. (2016). The influence of leadership styles, work environment and job satisfaction of employee performance studies in the school of SMPN 10 Surabaya. International Education Studies, 9(1), 131-140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
15. Chua, S.J.L., Ali, A.S., & Lim, M.E.L. (2016). Physical environment comfort impacts on administrative staff’s performance. MATEC Web Conferences, 66, 00124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
16. Chua, S.J.L., Myeda, N.E., & Yuan, X.T. (2022). Facilities management: Towards flexible work arrangement (FWA) implementation during Covid-19. Journal of Facilities Management, Vol. ahead-of-print No. ahead-of-print. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
17. Colenberg, S., Jylhä, T., & Arkesteijn, M. (2021). The relationship between interior office space and employee health and well-being – a literature review. Building Research & Information, 49(3), 352-366. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
18. Forbes, S., Birkett, H., Evans, L., Chung, H., & Whiteman, J. (2020). Managing employees during the COVID-19 pandemic: Flexible working and the future of work. United Kingdom Equal Parenting Project. Available at: [Link]
19. Gastearena-Balda, L., Ollo-López, A., & Larraza-Kintana, M. (2021). Are public employees more satisfied than private ones? The mediating role of job demands and job resources. Management Research, 19(3/4), 231-258. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
20. Hafeez, I., Yingjun, Z., Hafeez, S., Mansoor, R., & Rehman, K.U. (2019). Impact of workplace environment on employee performance: mediating role of employee health. Business, Management and Economics Engineering, 17(2), 173-193. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
21. Hamidi, N.N.E.B., Mansor, F.A., Hashim, M.Z., Muhammad, N., & Azib, W.N.H. (2020). The relationship between physical workplace environment and employees’ performance. Journal of Contemporary Social Science Research, 4(1), 56-67. [Google Scholar]
22. Haynes, B., Suckley, L., & Nunnington, N. (2017). Workplace productivity and office type: An evaluation of office occupier differences based on age and gender. Journal of Corporate Real Estate, 19(2), 111-138. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
23. Herbig, B., Schneider, A., & Nowak, D. (2016). Does office space occupation matter? The role of the number of persons per enclosed office space, psychosocial work characteristics, and environmental satisfaction in the physical and mental health of employees. Indoor Air, 26(5), 755-767. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
24. Idris, I., Adi, K.R., Soetjipto, B.E., & Supriyanto, A.S. (2020). The mediating role of job satisfaction on compensation, work environment, and employee performance: Evidence from Indonesia. Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Issues, 8(2), 735-750. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]  
25. Institute for Quality of Life (2018). The Impact of the physical workplace on performance: An introduction. Available at: [Link]   
26. Jackson, L.T.B. (2018). Job demands and resources in employee attitudes in a national government department. Journal of Public Administration, 53(3), 731-749. [Google Scholar]
27. Jason, P.R., Edmonds, K.A., Aspiras, O., Kumar, M., Scamaldo, K., Richmond, J.R., Tull, T.M., & Gratz, K.L. (2022). The impact of stay-at-home orders on vulnerability assessments and precautionary intentions during a pandemic. Psychology, Health & Medicine, 1-12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
28. Kamarulzaman, N., Saleh, A.A., Hashim, S.Z., Hashim, H., & Abdul-Ghani, A.A. (2011). An overview of the influence of physical office environment towards employees. Procedia Engineering, 20, 262-268. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
29. Kivunja, C. & Kuyini, A.B. (2017). Understanding and applying research paradigms in educational contexts. International Journal of higher education, 6(5), 26-41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
30. Maulidiyah, N.N. & Ilahi, R.R. (2020). The impact of physical work environment on employee performance by job satisfaction as mediator. International Journal of Research in Human Resource Management, 2(1), 1-3. Available at: [Link]
31. Manuj, Y., Cabrera, D., Kim, J., Fels, J., & de Dear, R. (2021). Sound in occupied open-plan offices: Objective metrics with a review of historical perspectives. Applied Acoustics, 177. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
32. Marín-Restrepo, L., Trebilcock, M., & Porras-Salazar, J.A. (2020). Adaptation by coexistence: contrasting thermal comfort perception among individual and shared office spaces. Architectural Science Review, 63(3-4), 235-247. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
33. Mhlanga, J.S. (2021). Measuring the perceptions of physical environment comfort on office employees’ performance: a case study at the Durban University of Technology, South Africa. Available at: [Link]
34. Muhammad, K.S., Fong-Woon, L., Chuah, L.F., Jiří, J.K., & Bokhari, A. (2019). Integrating sustainability reporting into enterprise risk management and its relationship with business performance: A conceptual framework. Journal of Cleaner Production, 208, 415-425. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
35. Mujtaba, B.G. & Cavico, F.J. (2020). Ethical Analysis of office romance and sexual favoritism policies in the #MeToo Workplace and “Cancel Culture” era. Socioeconomic Challenges, 4(4), 132-150. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
36. Naharuddin, N.M. & Sadegi, M. (2013). Factors of workplace environment that affect employees’ performance: A case study of Miyazu Malaysia. International Journal of Independent Research and Studies, 2(2), 66-78. [Google Scholar]
37. Nassiri, P.M.M., Dehaghi, B.F., Jundishapur, A., Abadi, L.I.G., Zakerian, S.A., & Azam, T. (2013). The effect of noise on human performance: A clinical trial. International Journal of Occupational Environment Medicine, 4(2), 87-95. [Google Scholar] 
38. Neo, L.S., Tan, J.Y.C., & Chew, T.Y.C. (2022). The influence of COVID-19 on women’s perceptions of work-family conflict in Singapore. Social Sciences, 11(2), 73. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
39. Ngcobo, S. & Mhlanga, J.S. (2022). Supervisors’ provision of physical environment resources to support staff in a public university Application of Job Demands-Resources theory. International Journal of Research in Business and Social Science, 11(5), 423-431. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
40. Ngirande, H. (2021). Occupational stress, uncertainty and organizational commitment in higher education: Job satisfaction as a moderator. SA Journal of Human Resource Management, 19(0), a1376. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
41. Nzewi, H.N., Augustine, A., Mohammed, I., & Godson, O. (2021). Physical work environment and employee performance in selected brewing firms in Anambra State, Nigeria. Journal of Good Governance and Sustainable Development in Africa, 4(2), 131-145. [Google Scholar]
42. Parashakti, R.D., Fahlevi, M., Ekhsan, M., Hadinata, A. (2020). The influence of work environment and competence on motivation and its impact on employee performance in health sector. Proceedings of the 3rd Asia Pacific International Conference of Management and Business Science (AICMBS 2019). [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
43. Parveen, A., Malik, M. H., & Aziz, R. (2012). Emotional intelligence and academic achievement of male and female adolescent students of district Budgam. Journal of Education and Practice, 3(15), 184-186. [Google Scholar]
44. Pawirosumarto, S., Sarjana, P.K., & Gunawan, R. (2017). The effect of work environment, leadership style, and organizational culture towards job satisfaction and its implication towards employee performance in Parador Hotels and Resorts, Indonesia. International Journal of Law and Management, 59(6), 1337-1358. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
45. Pracoyo, N.A., Tubastuvi, N., Santoso, S.B., & Wahyuni, S. (2022). Determinants of employee performance: The mediating role of job satisfaction. International Journal of Research in Business and Social Science, 11(2), 144-156. [CrossRef]
46. Prasastia, N. (2019). Analysis of physical and non-physical work environment PT. Kakiatna Indonesi to company performance. Journal of Economics and Business UBS, 8(1), 73-81. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
47. Priarso, M.T., Diatmono, P., & Mariam, S. (2018). The effect of transformational leadership style, work motivation, and work environment on employee performance that in mediation by job satisfaction variables in Pt. Gynura Consulindo. Business and Entrepreneurial Review, 18(2), 165-176. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
48. Putri, E., Vivin, M., Achmad, S., & Zaim, M. (2019). The effect of work environment on employee performance through work discipline. International Journal of Research – Granthaalayah, 7(4), 132-140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
49. Raziq, A. & Maulabakhsh, R. (2015). Impact of working environment on job satisfaction. Procedia Economics and Finance, 23, 717-725. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
50. Ricciardelli, R. & Carleton, R.N. (2022). A qualitative application of the Job Demand-Control-Support (JDCS) to contextualize the occupational stress correctional workers experience. Journal of Crime and Justice, 45(2), 135-151. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
51. Saleem, A., Shah, A.A., Zaman, K. Arif, M. Shehzad, K., & Ullah, I. (2012). Impact of interior physical environment on academicians’ productivity in Pakistan higher education institutes perspectives. Iran Journal of Management Studies, 5(1), 25-46. [Google Scholar]
52. Samani, S.A. (2015). The impact of personal control over office workspace on Environmental satisfaction and performance. Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities, 1(3), 163-172. [Google Scholar]
53. Sarode, A.P. & Shirsath, M. (2014). The factors affecting employee work environment and it’s relation with employee productivity. International Journal of Science and Research, 3(11), 2735-2737. Available at: [Link]  
54. Saltiel, F. (2020). Who can work from home in developing countries? Covid Economics, 7, 104-118. [Google Scholar]
55. Silvester, J.R. & Konstantinou, E. (2010). Lighting, well-being and work performance: A review of the literature. Philips. Available at: [Link]     
56. Siti, A.S., Deswindi, L., & Indrajaya, D. (2020). Are physical and non-physical working environment effect employees’ productivity with motivation as an intervening factor? Advances in Economics, Business and Management Research, volume 149. Proceedings of the 3rd Asia Pacific Management Research Conference (APMRC 2019) [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
57. Smollan, R.K. & Morrison, R.L. (2019). Office design and organizational change: The influence of communication and organizational culture. Journal of Organizational Change Management, 32(4), 426-440. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]  
58. Stoddart (2016). The workplace advantage: The £20 billion key: Why the office environment is key to productivity. The Stoddart Review. London: Raconteur Custom Publishing. Available at: [Link]
59. Office spatial design attributes, sitting, and face-to-face interactions: Systematic review and research agenda. Building and Environment, 187, 107426. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
60. Unguren, E. & Kacmaz, Y.Y. (2022). Innovations in management of hotel employees: the relationship between organizational resilience and work engagement. Marketing and Management of Innovations, 2, 141-150. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
61. van der Molen, H., Kuijer, P., de Groene, G., Bakker, J., Sorgdrager, B., Lenderink, A., Maas, J., & Brand, T. (2018). Beroepsziekten in cijfers 2018 [Occupational diseases 2018]. Amsterdam: Nederlands centrum voor beroepsziekten. Available at: [Link]  
62. Vimalanathan, K., & Babu, T.R. (2014). The effect of indoor office environment on the work performance, health and well-being of administrative staff. Journal of Environmental Health Science and Engineering (JEHSE), 12, 113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]   
63. Wulandari, R., Djawoto, D., & Prijati, P. (2021). The influence of delegative leadership style, motivation, work environment on employee performance in self-efficiency mediation in SNVT housing provision of East Java Province. Budapest International Research and Critics Institute (BIRCI-Journal): Humanities and Social Sciences, 4(3), 3294-3311. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
64. Yuan B. & Ekhsan, M. (2020). Effect of work environment and job satisfaction on employee performance in PT. Nesinak industries. Journal of Business, Management, and Accounting, 2(1), 85-91. [Google Scholar]