Abstract

The acceleration of globalisation processes and increasing countries’ energy interdependence are required to ensure national energy security and independence. That demands investigating and developing processes and approaches for sustainable transformation of the global energy sector. The article aims to perform a complex review and investigation of the academic environment to analyse the trends and features of scientific publications devoted to new trends and tendencies in the smart energy industry transformation. To provide a categorical and theoretical background on the key scientific publications’ trends, the paper conducted a bibliometric analysis of scientific publications about smart energy management and sustainable energy sector. The subject of investigation is publications on smart energy management and the sustainable energy sector. The article represented the results of bibliometric analysis using the Scopus tools analytics and VOSViewer tools. The investigation answered the central question of the key academic and research tendencies in the smart energy development and sustainable transformation field. Thus, qualitative, and quantitative trends describe the academic tendencies to spread smart and sustainable technologies in the energy industry. Using the Scopus scientometric database, a system of more than 5000 academic texts in the determined area was created from 2001 to 2022. Such countries as India, China, the USA, the UK, Germany, Italy, Canada, South Korea, France represent the analysed scientific area. Describing the key trends and clusters has allowed understanding and systemised the dominant trends in the development of scientific publications in the field of management of sustainable development processes, spreading the IOT processes, and renewable energy.

Keywords: energy sector, sustainable development, smart transformation, energy management, efficiency.

JEL Classification: O30, Q41, Q42.

Cite as: Chygryn, O., Bektas, C., & Havrylenko, O. (2023). Innovation and Management of Smart Transformation Global Energy Sector: Systematic Literature Review. Business Ethics and Leadership, 7(1), 105-112. https://doi.org/10.21272/bel.7(1).105-112.2023

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License

References

1. Andrișan, G., Modreanu, A. (2022). An Overview of The Fourth Industrial Revolution through the Business Lens. Business Ethics and Leadership, 6(1), 39-46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
2. Bardy, R., & Rubens, A. (2022). Weighing Externalities of Economic Recovery Projects: An Alternative to Green Taxonomies that is Fairer and more Realistic. Business Ethics and Leadership, 6(3), 23-34.  [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
3. Djalilov, K. (2022). A Contingent Resource-Based Perspective on Corporate Social Responsibility and Competitive Advantage: A Focus on Transition Countries. Business Ethics and Leadership, 6(1), 92-108.  [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
4. Dobrowolski, Z., Sulkowski, L., & Adamisin, P (2022). Innovative ecosystem: the role of lean management auditing. Marketing and Management of Innovations, 3, 9-20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
5. El Amri, A., Boutti, R., Oulfarsi, S., Rodhain, F., Bouzahir, B. (2020). Carbon financial markets underlying climate risk management, pricing and forecasting: Fundamental analysis. Financial Markets, Institutions and Risks, 4(4), 31-44. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
6. IEA (2022). International Energy Agency. Available at: [Link]
7. Khalatur, S., & Dubovych, O. (2022). Financial Engineering of Green Finance as an Element of Environmental Innovation Management. Marketing and Management of Innovations, 1, 232-246.  [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
8. Koibichuk, V., Samoilikova, A., and Habenko, M. (2022). The effectiveness of employment in high-tech and science-intensive business areas as important indicator of socio-economic development: cross-country cluster analysis. SocioEconomic Challenges, 6(4), 106-115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
9. Kolosok, S., Kovalenko, Ye.V. (2022). Factor Analysis Of Energy Security: Net Import Dependency. SocioEconomic Challenges, 6(2), 138-146. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
10. Kyrychenko, K., Laznenko, D., & Reshetniak, Ya. (2021). Green University as an Element of Forming a Sustainable Public Health System. Health Economics and Management Review, 2(4), 21-26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
11. Louis, R. (2022). The Global Socioeconomic Impact of Mental Health. SocioEconomic Challenges, 6(2), 50-56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
12. Mlaabdal, S., Chygryn, O., Kwilinski, A., Muzychuk, O., & Akimov, O.O. (2020). Economic Growth and Oil Industry Development: Assessment of the Interaction of National Economy Indicators. Proceedings of the 36th International Business Information Management Association (IBIMA), 8102-8114. [Google Scholar]
13. Pimonenko T., Lyulov O., Chygryn O. (2018) Marketing of green investments: a mechanism of collaboration between the main stakeholders. Bulletin of the Priazov State Technical University. Series: Economic Sciences, 36, 214-220. [CrossRef]
14. Saher, L., Vakulenko, I., Shevchenko, K., Bondarenko, Y., Lyulyov, O. (2022). Bibliometric and Retrospective Analysis on Economic Behavior for Inclusive Growth. Financial Markets, Institutions and Risks, 6(2), 102-111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
15. Vakulenko, I., & Lieonov, H. (2022). Renewable Energy and Health: Bibliometric Review of Non-Medical Research. Health Economics and Management Review, 3(2), 44-53.  [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
16. Vostrykov, P., & Jura, A. (2022). Environmental Taxes Impact for the Population Health Protection: Cross-Country Analysis. Health Economics and Management Review, 3(4), 35-45. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
17. Yang, C., Kwilinski, A., Chygryn, O., Lyulyov, O., & Pimonenko, T. (2021). The green competitiveness of enterprises: Justifying the quality criteria of digital marketing communication channels.Sustainability (Switzerland), 13(24) [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
18. Ziabina, Y., & Navickas, V (2022). Innovations in Energy Efficiency Management: Role of Public Governance. Marketing and Management of Innovations, 4, 218-227. [Google Scholar][CrossRef]