Abstract

In the United States, the political landscape is characterized by biannual changes in power between the two major political parties, the Democratic and Republican parties. The shift in power can lead to significant changes in the regulatory environment for businesses, with each party having different policies and priorities when it comes to business regulation. Our research investigates the impact of political power shifts on consumer perceptions of business ethics. We collected two sample datasets through telephone interviews, the first conducted before the November 2018 mid-term elections (N=1,003) and the second after the elections (N=1,009). Our findings were surprising. Despite the mid-term elections being a significant political event and a change in power, we found that they did not immediately impact consumer perceptions of business ethics. This study offers new insights into the relationship between political power shifts and consumer perceptions of business ethics in the United States and is the first to examine this issue. The results suggest that consumer perceptions of business ethics may be relatively stable despite changes in political power. The leniency or stringency of regulations imposed on businesses by political parties may not significantly alter consumers’ perceptions of ethical behavior. It is an important finding for businesses as it highlights the importance of maintaining ethical practices and behavior, regardless of political circumstances. Our research sheds light on the complex relationship between political power shifts and consumer attitudes toward business ethics. It provides a starting point for future investigations into this topic, which is especially relevant in today’s political climate. The findings have significant implications for businesses, as they underscore the importance of maintaining a strong ethical foundation and reputation, regardless of changes in the regulatory environment. By doing so, businesses can build trust and maintain consumer loyalty in the long run.

Keywords: consumer perceptions, political affiliation, mid-term elections, perception of business ethics.

JEL Classification: D72, M38.

Cite as: Tsalikis, J., Haderlie, T., & Sewak, S. (2023). Evaluating Consumer Perceptions of Businesses Pre- and Post-Midterm Elections Using Business Ethics Index (BEI). Business Ethics and Leadership, 7(1), 96-104. https://doi.org/10.21272/bel.7(1).96-104.2023

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License

References

1. Brunk, K.H. and Bluemelhuber, Ch. (2010). The Impact of Un/Ethical Corporate Conduct on Consumers’ Ethical Perceptions − a Multidimensional Framework. Association for Consumer Research, 37, 368-373. [Google Scholar]
2. Crane, A. (2005). In the company of spies: When competitive intelligence gathering becomes industrial espionage. Business Horizons, 48(3), 233-240. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
3. Creyer, E.H., and Ross, Jr.W.T. (1997). Tradeoffs Between Price and Quality: How a Value Index Affects Preference Formation. The Journal of Consumer Affairs, 31(2), 280-302. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
4. Epstein, E. (1984). PACs and the modern political process. In B. Bock, H. Goldschmid, I. Millstein and F. Scherer (eds.), The Impact of the Modern Corporation, Columbia University Press, New York, 399-496. [Google Scholar]
5. Fullerton, S., Kerch, K.B., and Dodge, H.R. (1996). Consumer Ethics: An Assessment of Individual Behavior in the Market Place. Journal of Business Ethics, 15(7), 805-814. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
6. Galavielle, Jean-Pierre (2004). Business Ethics is a Matter of Good Conduct and of Good Conscience? Journal of Business Ethics, 53(1-2), 9-16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
7. Getz, K. (1993). Selecting corporate political tactics. In B. Mitnick (ed.), Corporate Political Agency, 242-273. [Google Scholar]
8. Hillman, A.J., Zardkoohi, A., and Bierman, L. (1999). Corporate political strategies and firm performance: indications of firm‐specific benefits from personal service in the U.S. government. Strategic Management Journal, 20, 67-81. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
9. Islam, T., Islam, R., Pitafi, A. H., Xiaobei, L., Rehmani, M., Irfan, M., & Mubarak, M.S. (2021). The impact of corporate social responsibility on customer loyalty: The mediating role of corporate reputation, customer satisfaction, and trust. Sustainable Production and Consumption, 25, 123-135. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
10. Keim, G., and Zeithaml, C. (1986). Corporate political strategy and legislative decision making: A review and contingency approach. Academy of Management Review, 11, 828-843. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
11. Morgan, R.M., Hunt, S.D. (1994). The Commitment-Trust Theory of Relationship Marketing. Journal of Marketing, 58, 20-38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
12. Mohr, L.A., Webb, D.J., and Harris, K.E. (2001). Do Consumers Expect Companies to be Socially Responsible? The Impact of Corporate Social Responsibility on Buying Behavior. The Journal of Consumer Affairs, 35(1), 45-72. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
13. Newholm, T., Shaw, D. (2007). Studying the ethical consumer: a review of research. Journal of Consumer Behavior, 6, 253-270. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
14. Pittman, R. (1977). Market structure and campaign contributions. Public Choice, 31(1), 37-52. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
15. Sen, S., Bhattacharya, C.B. (2001). Does Doing Good Always Lead to Doing Better? Consumer Reactions to Corporate Social Responsibility. Journal of Marketing Research, XXXVIII, 225-243. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
16. Teece, D. (1988). The Competitive Challenge. Ballinger, Cambridge, MA. [Google Scholar]
17. Tsalikis, J., and Fritzsche, David J. (2013). Business ethics: A literature review with a focus on marketing ethics. Citation classics from the Journal of Business Ethics: Celebrating the first thirty years of publication, 337-404. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
18. Tsalikis, J., Seaton, B. (2006). Business Ethics Index: Measuring Consumer Sentiments Toward Business Ethical Practices. Journal of Business Ethics, 64, 317-326. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
19. Vitell, S.J., Singhapakdi, A., and Thomas, J. (2001). Consumer ethics: an application and empirical testing of the Hunt-Vitell theory of ethics. Journal of Consumer Marketing, 18(2), 153-178. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
20. Zardkoohi, A. (1985). On the political participation of the firm in the electoral process. Southern Economics Journal, 51(3), 804-817. [Google Scholar][CrossRef]