Abstract

This research article proposes a scientific methodological approach to calculation of financial market infrastructure index that characterizes a level of infrastructural efficiency. It also describes a staged algorithm of its calculation. It involves indicators that represent both quantity and quality characteristics that precede the development of financial market infrastructure. The calculation of the indicator must be performed as to institutional and to private interests of investors. Informative value of this index is aimed at satisfying interests of investors.

Keywords: Projected indicator, Financial market, Infrastructure, Predictive assessment, Infrastructure development index.

JEL Classification: C520, E440, G140.

Cite as: Rekunenko, I. (2017). Scientific methodological approach to defining projected indicator of financial market infrastructural efficiency. Financial Markets, Institutions and Risks, 1(1), 80-86. http://doi.org/10.21272/fmir.1(1).80-86.2017.

References

1. Beechey, М., Gruen, D., Vick, J. (2000). The Efficient Market Hypothesis: a Survey. Reserve Bank of Australia Research Discussion Paper № 2000-01, 4.
2. Burger, P. and Hawkesworth, I. (2011). How To Attain Value for Money: Comparing PPP and Traditional Infrastructure Public Procurement, OECD Journal on Budgeting, Volume 2011/1, OECD.
3. Construction Sector Transparency Initiative (2012), Press Release, http://www.constructiontransparency.org/documentdownload.axd?documentresourceid=8. Last accessed 19 February 2015.
4. Cost Sector Transparency Initiative (2011), Transparency and accountability in the construction sector. Available at http://www.constructiontransparency.org/documentdownloadaxd? Documentresourceid =46. Last accessed 19 February 2015.
5. Culbard, Lis and Nguyen, Tam (2015). Infrastructure’s role in achieving the post-2015 United Nations sustainable development goals, Bechtel. Available at http://www.bechtel.com/aboutus/insights/ 2015-united-nations-sustainable-development-goals/
6. De Mello, L. and Sutherland, D. (2014). Financing Infrastructure, International Center for Public Policy, Working Paper 14-09, Andrew Young School, Georgia State University
7. Eberhard, A. (2007). Matching Regulatory Design to Country Circumstances, Gridlines, Note no. 23, PPIAF, The World Bank, Washington DC.
8. Engel, E., Fischer. R., and Galetovic, A. (2010). The Economics of Infrastructure Finance: PublicPrivate Partnerships versus Public Provision, EIB Papers: Public and private financing of infrastructure, 15(1), European Investment Bank, Luxembourg.
9. Guasch, J.L., J.J. Laffont and S. Straub (2007), Concessions of Infrastructure in Latin America: Government-Led Renegotiation, Journal of Applied Econometrics, 22(7), 1267-1294.
10. Guasch, J.L., J.J. Laffont and S. Straub (2008), Renegotiation of Concession Contracts in Latin America: Evidence for the Water and Transport Sectors, International Journal of Industrial Organisation, 26(2), 421-442.
11. Hart, O. (2003). Incomplete Contracts and Public Ownership: Remarks, and an Application to Public-Private Partnerships, The Economic Journal, Vol. 113, No. 486, Royal Economic Society, Blackwell Publishing, Oxford