Abstract

Today one of the key tasks of economic development in different countries of the world is the ensuring of stable functioning of the financial sector in general and the banking system in particular. The processes of consolidation of bank capital, complication of banking business technologies, increasing banks’ risk appetite for risk concentration and speculative operations, and increasing systemic financial risks require the attention of financial sector regulators to identify potential imbalances in the activities of banks. One of the central places in the banking regulation system is off-site banking supervision, in particular, remote monitoring of the activities of banks. A series of reforms aimed at introducing macro-prudential banking supervision in accordance with the requirements of the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision has been initiated, but given the low transparency of domestic banks and the lack of existing mechanisms for risk taking into account in supervisory work, the reform of the existing system of remote monitoring on the basis of risk-oriented approach.

Keywords: risk-oriented monitoring, banking supervision, banking system, financial sector.

JEL Classification: G21, G29.

Cite as: Alibeki H., Samsonov M. (2017). Stress testing and elements of consolidated supervision as key instruments for enhanced risk-oriented monitoring of banks’ activities. Financial Markets, Institutions and Risks, 1(4), 37-46. DOI: 10.21272/fmir.1(4).37-46.2017

References

1. Hendricks D. (2009). Defining Systemic Risk. The Pew Financial Reform Project. Retrieved from: http://www.pewtrusts.org/our_worl.aspx?id=3242.
2. Nelson, Wayne B. (2004), Accelerated Testing, Statistical Models, Test Plans, and Data Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, New York, ISBN 0-471-69736-2
3. Bank Stress Test. Retrieved from http://www.investopedia.com/ terms/b/bank-stress-test.asp
4. G.A. Capolino H. Henao G. Cirrincione R. Grisel T. Assaf G. (2001). Ekwe. Monitoring and diagnosis of induction machines in the University of Picardie: present and future. Proceedings International Symposium on Diagnostics for Electrical Machines Power Electronics & Drives, 111-117.
5. Herring R. (2005). BCCI & Barings: bank resolutions complicated by fraud and global corporate structure: Retrieved from: http://fic.wharton.upenn.edu/fic/papers/05/0518.pdf.
6. Hirtle B. (2009). Macroprudential Supervision of Financial Institutions: Lessons from the SCAP. Federal Reserve Bank of New York Staff Reports, 13-61.
7. Increasing the Intensity and Effectiveness of SIFI Supervision. Retrieved from: http://www.financialstabilityboard.org/publications/r_121031ab.pdf.
8. Intensity and Effectiveness of SIFI Supervision Recommendations for enhanced supervision [Electronic resource]. Retrieved from: http://www.imf.org/external/np/mcm/financialstability/papers/sifisup.pdf.
9. International Convergence of Capital Measurement and Capital Standards. A Revised Framework Retrieved from: http://www.bis.org.
10. International Convergence of Capital Standards. Basel Committee on Banking Supervision. Retrieved from: http://www.bis.org.
11. Kaminsky G. (2000). The leading indicators of currency crises. National Bureau of Economic research, 63, 316-341.
12. Karas A. (2009). The Effect of Deposit Insurance on Market Discipline: Evidence from a Natural Experiment on Deposit Flows. Middlebury College Working Paper Series, 9, 234-249.
13. Kaufman G. (1990). Are Some Banks Too Large to Fail? Myth and Reality. Contemporary Economic Policy, 8, 3-14.
14. Kaufman G. (2003). What is Systemic Risk, and do Bank Regulators Retard or Contribute to it? Journal of Political Economy, l.7, 371-391.
15. Kupiec P. (2004). Assessing Systemic Risk Exposure from Banks and GSEs Under Alternative Approaches to Capital Regulation. The Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics, 28, 14-23.
16. Lindgren C. (1999). Financial Sector Crisis and Restructuring. Lessons from Asia. Washington: Occasional Paper, 103.
17. Measuring the systemic importance of interconnected banks by Mathias Drehmann and Nikola Tarashev. Retrieved from: http://www.bis.org.
18. Nelson P. (2001). Transparency mechanisms at the multilateral development banks / P. Nelson // World dev, 29(11), 1835-1847.
19. Newman P. (1992). The New Palgrave Dictionary of Money & Finance (in 3 volumes). London: Macmillan Press Limited, 865.
20. On Systemically Important Financial Institutions and Progressive Systemic Mitigation. Retrieved from: http://www.clevelandfed.org/research/policy/pdp27.cfm.
21. Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act. Retrieved from: http://www.cftc.gov/ucm/groups/public _enrolledbill.pdf.
22. Domestic systemically important banks. Retrieved from: http://www.apra.gov.au/Publications/Documents/Risk202012.pdf.
23. Enhanced Risk Disclosure by Banks. Retrieved from: https://www.financialstabilityboard. org/publications /r_121029.pdf.
24. Enhancing Financial Stability and Resilience: Macroprudential. (2010). Policy, Tools, and Systems for the Future. Group of Thirty. Retrieved from: http://www.group30.org/images/PDF/ Macroprudential_ Report.pdf.
25. European Central Bank Report (2010). Recent Advances in Modelling Systemic Risk Using Network Analysis. Retrieved from: http://www.ecb.europa.eu/pub/pdf/other/modellingsystemicrisk012010en. pdf?d216f976f3587224bcc087cc8149ed49.
26. European Systemic Risk. Retrieved from: http://www.esrb.europa.eu/about/background/html/ index.en.html.
27. Freeman R. (1984). Strategic management: A stakeholder approach, Boston: Pitman, 276.
28. GAMMA Score e-Brochure. Retrieved from: http://www.standardandpoors.com/about-sp/gamma/en/eu.