Abstract

This paper´s main purpose (based on author´s own experience) is to allow to the public organization’s agent to get a better understanding of how the private sector works. It seems crucial as the private sector is the state´s principal supplier, acting as its counterpart in an almost daily negotiation.

Since the article is destinated finally to state agents (seldom management experts), a colloquial language is vastly used, avoiding as much as possible any very tough academic definitions.

Keywords: state agent, private sector, negotiation.

JEL Classification: H, H39.

Cite as: Moskovicz, Ab. (Abi). (2018). Helping State Agent to understand the Private Sector. Financial Markets, Institutions and Risks, 2(1), 75-78.

References

1. Abell, D. (1979). Defining the bussines. Englewood Cliffs, Prentice Hall, 83-97.
2. Arbnor, I & Bjerke, B (2009). Methodology for creating business knowledge, Sage, 111-124.
3. Andrew, J. & Sirkin; H. (2003). Harvard Business Review, September, 38-46.
4. Arnold, A. & Majluf, N (1995). Management of companies with a strategic vision. 3rd Edition.Economics and management collection Dolmes, 87-92.
5. Astrachan, J & Jaskiewicz, P (2008), Emotional returns and emotional costs in privately held family firms, Family Business Review, Vol 21. 139-149.
6. Barker, J. (1999). Paradigma, Editorial Mc Graw Hill, 35-42.
7. Bonoma, T (1985). Case Research in Marketing: opportunities, Problems and a Process, Journal of Marketing, 199-207.
8. Bryman, A (1989), Research Methods and Organization Studies, Routledge P. 149-156.
9. Cameron, E & Green, M (2009), Making Sense of Change Management, Kogan, 72-84.
10. Collins, D. & Montgomery, C. (1995). Competing on resources: HBR, July, 44-58.
11. Cuellar, Y. (2005). Feather Sport Shoes Co. MBA thesis Usach, 32-71.
12. Damodaran, A (2005), The Value of Synergy, Stern School of Business, 132-146.
13. Eriksen, R & Moller, L (2008). An Empirical study of the Value creation in M&A, Aarthus School of Business, 213-219.
14. Evans, F & Bishop, D (2005). Valuation for M&A: building value in private companies, Wiley Publishers, 27-71.
15. Ghauri, P & Gronhaug, K (2005). Research methods in business studies: a practical guide, Financial Times Prentice Hall, 132-124.
16. Hammersley, M & Atkinson, P (1983). Ethnocracy, Principles in practice, The Open University (U.K.), 42-49.
17. Hernández R. & Fernández, C. (2004). Methodology of research, Mc Graw Hill, 31-37.
18. Jennings, R (2007). Differentiating nursing leadership and management competencies, Nursing Outlook, 55, 87-92.
19. Kalakota, R. & Robinson, M. (2001). e-commerce to the e-business, Pearson, 62-69.
20. Kinnear, T & Taylor, J. (1996). Marketing Research: An Applied approach, McGraw-Hill, 92-97.
21. Kotler, P. (1994). Marketing Management: Analysis, Planning, Implementation and Control. EnglewoodCliffs, Prentice – Hall, 73-76.
22. Simons, H. (2009). Case study research in practice. Sage Publications Inc, 175-183.
23. Stanton, J. & Etzel W. (1988). Fundamentals of Marketing, Mc Graw Hill, 37-82.
24. Trout, J. & Rivkin, S. (2003). New position, Editorial Mc Graw Hill, 77-91.
25. Turner, P. (2001). A perfect storm” in X Icare Chilean Congress of Marketing, 45-61.
26. Penrose, E. (1959). The theory of the growth of the firm Basil Blackwell, 142-148.
27. Porter, M. (2003). Be competitive. Editorial Deusto S.A. 73-78.