Contents |
Authors:
Dr Abraham (Abi) Moskovicz, ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5008-4420 Researcher & Lecturer, the School of Business Administration, the University of Haifa, Israel
Pages: 52-57
Language: English
DOI: https://doi.org/10.21272/fmir.5(2).52-57.2021
Received: 19.04.2021
Accepted: 22.05.2021
Published: 25.06.2021
Download: |
Views: |
Downloads: |
|
|
|
Abstract
This essay focuses on the post-Covid19 environment of entrepreneurial ideas that have potentials of success and growth in the coming years, providing an insight into the prolific funding being made available for University startups, especially in their early stages of development. To achieve this objective, it seems crucial to define firstly many terms frequently used and to determinate the involved variables. Whoever is able to predict this new post-Covid reality and glimpse the later scenario, will be better prepared for the new times, which will be as changing and indefinite as in the past. It seems the right time to transform ideas into realities. Whether it is a student presenting his thesis or an entrepreneur landing his postponed projects, this new scenario more than tempting forces to undertake. Through an University startup accelerator, it is possible to anticipate your competitors, learning about new proposals, counting on the advice and mentoring of independent professional experts. Universities with a sufficiently strong entrepreneurial ecosystem can serve as an ideal launch pad for startups founded by its own students and researchers.
Keywords: Startups, University, Accelerators, Entrepreneurs, Success.
JEL Classification: M13, L26, L32.
Cite as: Moskovicz, A. (2021). Post-pandemic Scenario for University Startup Accelerators. Financial Markets, Institutions and Risks, 5(2), 52-57. https://doi.org/10.21272/fmir.5(2).52-57.2021
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
References
- Behar, R. (2016) Inside Israel’s secret startup Forbes, May 31. [Link]
- Cohen, S. (2013) What do Accelerators do: Insights from incubators and angels. MIT Press. Innovations: Technology, Governance, Globalization, 8, 3-4 (Summer-Fall 2013): 19-25. [Link]
- Eckhardt, J. (2015) Should I participate in a Business Entrepreneur & Innovation Exchange. [Link]
- Fowle, M. (2017) Critical success factors for business accelerators: A theoretical Warwick Business School. Project: HEFCE Catalyst PIPE Project. [Link]
- Jensen, R. (2015) University Startups and Entrepreneurship: New Data, new University of Notre Dame. [Link]
- Kanbach, D. & Stubner, S. (2016) Corporate accelerators startup engagement: The what, the why and the [CrossRef]
- Kotys-Schwartz, D. (2019) Assessment of a cross-disciplinary University startup accelerator. [Google Scholar]
- Salamzadeh, A. & Kawamorita, K (2015) Startup Companies: Life Cycle and challenges. EEE Conferencesг[CrossRef]
- Showalter, D. & Jensen R (2019). University Startup intensity and Faculty quality. Economic Enquiry.[Google Scholar]
- Stagars, M. (2014). University Startups and Spin-offs: Guide for Entrepreneurs in Academia. Apress. [Google Scholar]
- Stagars, M. (2015). Why are University accelerators not taking off. ResearchGate. [Link]
- Swamidass, P. (2011). The challenge facing University Startups in USA.[Google Scholar]
- Torun, M. (2016). Business accelerators and their differences from incubators. [Google Scholar]
|