Contents |
Authors:
Olena Skrynnyk, ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8300-6616 Technology manager, Modis, Stuttgart, 70174, Germany
Pages: 79-86
Language: English
DOI: https://doi.org/10.21272/fmir.5(3).79-86.2021
Received: 11.08.2021
Accepted: 08.09.2021
Published: 13.09.2021
Download: |
Views: |
Downloads: |
|
|
|
Abstract
In the context of this study, a literature review and the survey of German business executives were conducted. On the way to digitalisation, companies try to support or replace as many processes as possible using software and tools. The main purpose of this study consisted in investigating corporate investment behaviour in digital technologies for organisational development. Since the progress in this area in recent period is very large, consists the need to determine how do companies choose the appropriate functions and how much are they willing to invest for their execution. The study relies on a review of recent publications, statistical analysis and empirical analysis based on the results of online surveys. Behavioural determinants defined include regularity and predictability of organisational development, spending points, purpose of investment, previous experience with investment object, possible reasons against investment. It was compared which characteristics of companies (number of employees, annual turnover, age of the company, orientation) can influence a statement about the level of investment in organisational development, as well as desired functions and possible decision against investment in digital technologies. Furthermore, the current expenditures for organisational development were compared with the investments of companies with the same characteristics. The results demonstrate the different distribution of statistically collected data for personal purposes and the estimated investment volumes for digital tools for organisational development, despite relatively similar figures for current expenditure on organisational development.
Keywords: investment behaviour, organisational development, digital technologies.
JEL Classification: G3, G31, G40.
Cite as: Skrynnyk, O. (2021). Analysis of Corporate Investment Behaviour in Digital Technologies for Organisational Development Purposes. Financial Markets, Institutions and Risks, 5(3), 79-86. https://doi.org/10.21272/fmir.5(3).79-86.2021
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
References
- Alabass, H.S.H.H. (2019). The impact of corporate investment behaviour on the corporate performance: Evidence from an emerging market. Journal of Management Information and Decision Science, 22. [Link]
- Statistisches Bundesamt. Retrieved on 10.09.2021. [Link]
- Hayashida, H., Funashima, H., Katayama-Yoshida, H. (2013). Understanding management of technology as a dynamic capability: Case study by dynamic analysis model for technology management activities. 2013 Proceedings of PICMET 2013: Technology Management in the IT-Driven Services 6641600, 26-32. [Link]
- Hernández, H.G., Cardona, D.A., Del Rio, J.L. (2017). Strategic direction: Projection of technological innovation and administrative management in small enterprises. [Direccionamiento estratégico: Proyección de la innovación tecnológica y gestión administrativa en las pequeñas empresas]. Informacion Tecnologica, 28(5), 15-22. [Google Scholar]
- Nobl Academy (2016). How Much Should You Pay for Org Design & Development? [Link]
- Riera, C. and Iijima, J. (2015). Does Investment in Digital Technologies Yield Digital Business Value? The Digital Investment Paradox and Knowledge Creation as Enabling Capability. In Proceedings of the 10th International Joint Conference on Knowledge Discovery, Knowledge Engineering and Knowledge Management (IC3K 2018), 3, 208-215. [Google Scholar]
- Saleem, F., Salim, N., Altalhi, A. H., Ullah, Z., AL-Malaise AL-Ghamdi, A., Khan, Z. M. (2020). Assessing the effects of information and communication technologies on organizational development: business values perspectives. Information Technology for Development, 26(1), 54-88. [Link]
- Saetang, S., Haider, A., Ku Bahador, K.M. (2013). Building effective organizational management with bricolage and it governance on technology acceptance model. Proceedings of the International Conference on Electronic Business (ICEB), 132-138. [Link]
- Sample size calculator. Retrieved on 10.09.2021. [Link]
- Siller H., Grausam A. (2016). Management in EPU und Kleinstunternehmen. In: Selbstcontrolling für Selbständige und kleine Unternehmen. Springer Gabler, Wiesbaden. [Link]
- Solanki, S., Wadhwa, S., Gupta, S. (2019). Digital Technology: An Influential Factor in Investment Decision Making. International Journal of Engineering and Advanced Technology, 8, 27-31. [Link]
- Yan, Y., Ding, D., Mak, S. (2009). The Impact of Business Investment on Capability Exploitation and Organizational Control in International Strategic Alliances. Journal of Change Management, 9(1), 49-65. [Google Scholar]
|