Contents |
Authors:
Liudmyla Saher, ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5628-5477 PhD, Associate Professor, Sumy State University, Ukraine Ihor Vakulenko, ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6994-833X PhD, Sumy State University, Ukraine Kateryna Shevchenko, ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4558-7792 Bachelor student, Sumy State University, Ukraine Yevheniia Bondarenko, ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0673-7006 Bachelor student, Sumy State University, Ukraine Oleksii Lyulyov, ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4865-7306 Doctor of Economics, Professor, Marketing Department, Sumy State University, Sumy, Ukraine
Pages: 102-111
Language: English
DOI: https://doi.org/10.21272/fmir.6(2).102-111.2022
Received: 20.04.2022
Accepted: 08.06.2022
Published: 30.06.2022
Download: |
Views: |
Downloads: |
|
|
|
Abstract
The article provides a bibliometric analysis of existing publications on the market participants’ behavior(manufacturers, trading companies, and other intermediaries and consumers). The basis for the study is the Scopus database, which presents publications on this topic for over thirty years. The article aims to study the research directions on behavioral models of economic entities and the factors that influence their formation. Such analysis can be used to determine the place of behavioral economics in the system of modern views of economists on its impact on the further global development of the economic system. By selecting the most relevant articles on the economic behavior of market participants in the context of an inclusive economy, 1198 scientific articles were selected, published in periodicals from 1989 to 2021. The clustering and retrospective analysis were chosen as a methodological study tool, performed using VOSviewer 1.6.16 software. It made it possible to obtain a clear visualization of research clusters on economic entities’ behavioral aspects, including individual periods of the enormous publication activity from 2011 to 2021. In addition, the article identifies the largest regional research networks of behavioral models in an inclusive economy. Based on the analysis of the scientific publications from the Scopus database, three periods of research on the behavioral aspects of economic entities were identified. The study of the first stage focused on e-commerce development as a significant factor in market changes, accompanied by the transition of competition from local to global. The next phase of the economic behavior study was accompanied by the sustainable development concept and changes in consumer values, which influenced the choice of suppliers and service providers and the growing importance of decision criteria that previously could not be considered purely economic. Considerable attention in this period of publishing activity was paid to social responsibility and sustainable consumption. The last research defined in the article stages is aimed at using modern research methods and information technologies for a deeper analysis of the subject area. It makes it possible to identify relevant factors influencing the formation of economic entities’ behavior patterns, which could not be determined before.
Keywords: economy, market, behavior, business, consumers, inclusive growth.
JEL Classification: D11, H30, O10.
Cite as: Saher, L., Vakulenko, I., Shevchenko, K., Bondarenko, Y., Lyulyov, O. (2022). Bibliometric and Retrospective Analysis on Economic Behavior for Inclusive Growth. Financial Markets, Institutions and Risks, 6(2), 102-111. https://doi.org/10.21272/fmir.6(2).102-111.2022
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
References
- Alefan, Q., Nawasrah, A., Almomani, B., & Al-Issa, E. T. (2022). Direct medical cost of pediatric asthma in Jordan: A cost-of-illness retrospective cohort study. Value in Health Regional Issues, 31, 10-17. [Link]
- Arora, S. (2019). Customer Behaviour-Online Travel Industry in India. SocioEconomic Challenges, 3(1),90-98. [CrossRef]
- Ata, S., & Sezer, A. (2021). Evaluating the Effects of Life Satisfaction on Impulse Buying Behavior in Terms of Online Buying. Marketing and Management of Innovations, 1, 38-55. [CrossRef]
- Biewendt, M. et. al. (2021). Motivational Factors in Organisational Change. SocioEconomic Challenges, 5(3), 15-27. [CrossRef]
- Bildiren, A., & Çitil, M. (2022). Educating gifted children in Turkey: A retrospective analysis and the current state. International Journal of Educational Reform, 31(3), 278-299. [Google Scholar]
- Chong, A. Y. -., Chan, F. T. S., & Ooi, K. -. (2012). Predicting consumer decisions to adopt mobile commerce: Cross country empirical examination between china and malaysia. Decision Support Systems, 53(1), 34-43. [Google Scholar]
- Davidaviciene, V., Meidute-Kavaliauskiene, I. & Paliulis, R. (2019). Research on the Influence of Social Media on Generation Y Consumer Purchase Decisions. Marketing and Management of Innovations, 4, 39-49. [CrossRef]
- Dittmar, H., Bond, R., Hurst, M., & Kasser, T. (2014). The relationship between materialism and personal well-being: A meta-analysis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 107(5), 879-924. [Google Scholar]
- Domonkos, T., & Ostrihoň, F. (2015). Inclusive growth in selected central European countries. Ekonomicky Casopis, 63(9), 881-905. [Google Scholar]
- Dubina, O., Us, Y., Pimonenko, T., & Lyulyov, O. (2020). Customer loyalty to bank services: The bibliometric analysis. Virtual Economics, 3(3), 53-66. [Google Scholar]
- Duffy G. A., Duffy V. G. (2020). Systematic Literature Review on the Effect of Human Error in Environmental Pollution. In International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction, 228-241. [Google Scholar]
- Dunska, M., Salkovska, J., Batraga, A., & Braslina, L. (2018). Consumer behaviour in innovative products purchasing process. Marketing and Management of Innovations, 3, 276-289. [CrossRef]
- Fernandes, D., Lynch Jr., J. G., & Netemeyer, R. G. (2014). Financial literacy, financial education, and downstream financial behaviors. Management Science, 60(8), 1861-1883. [Google Scholar]
- George, G., Mcgahan, A. M., & Prabhu, J. (2012). Innovation for inclusive growth: Towards a theoretical framework and a research agenda. Journal of Management Studies, 49(4), 661-683. [Google Scholar]
- Gupta, J., & Vegelin, C. (2016). Sustainable development goals and inclusive development. International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics, 16(3), 433-448. [Google Scholar]
- Hay, C., Hunt, T., J. Allister McGregor (2020). Inclusive growth: the challenges of multidimensionality and multilateralism, Cambridge Review of International Affairs, 1-27. [Google Scholar]
- Heshmati, A., Kim, J., Wood, J. A. (2019). Survey of Inclusive Growth Policy.Economies,7, 65. [CrossRef]
- Hong, J., Chu, Z., & Wang, Q. (2011). Transport infrastructure and regional economic growth: Evidence from china. Transportation, 38(5), 737-752. [Google Scholar]
- Kim, D. J., Ferrin, D. L., & Rao, H. R. (2008). A trust-based consumer decision-making model in electronic commerce: The role of trust, perceived risk, and their antecedents. Decision Support Systems, 44(2), 544-564. [Google Scholar]
- Kim, H. Y., & Chung, J. (2011). Consumer purchase intention for organic personal care products. Journal of Consumer Marketing, 28(1), 40-47. [Google Scholar]
- Kolosok, S.; Bilan, Y.; Vasylieva, T.; Wojciechowski, A.; Morawski, M. A. (2021). Scoping Review of Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment. Energies, 14, 4490. [Google Scholar]
- Letunovska, N. Y., Liulov, O. V., Pimonenko, T. V., & Aleksandrov, V. T. (2021). Environmental management and social marketing: a bibliometric analysis. E3S Web of Conferences 234, ICIES 2020. [CrossRef]
- Makerska V.O., Khomenko L.M., Pimonenko T.V. (2021). Promotion tools in small and medium enterprises: bibliometric analysis. Problems of systemic approach in the economy, 5(85), 64-74. [Google Scholar]
- McKnight, D. H., & Chervany, N. L. (2001). What trust means in e-commerce customer relationships: An interdisciplinary conceptual typology. International Journal of Electronic Commerce, 6(2), 35-59. [Google Scholar]
- Napoli, J., Dickinson, S. J., Beverland, M. B., & Farrelly, F. (2014). Measuring consumer-based brand authenticity. Journal of Business Research, 67(6), 1090-1098. [Google Scholar]
- Pasco, M. C., Flores-González, N., & Atkin, A. L. (2022). A retrospective analysis of racial discrimination experiences for latinx adolescents and young adults. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 32(2), 636-649. [Google Scholar]
- Prothero, A., Dobscha, S., Freund, J., Kilbourne, W. E., Luchs, M. G., Ozanne, L. K., & Thøgersen, J. (2011). Sustainable consumption: Opportunities for consumer research and public policy. Journal of Public Policy and Marketing, 30(1), 31-38. [Google Scholar]
- Rahmanov F., Mursalov. M., & Rosokhata, A. (2021). Consumer Behavior in Digital Era: Impact of COVID-19. Marketing and Management of Innovations, 2, 256-264. [Google Scholar]
- Salé, M.J., Muharremi, O., Hoxhaj, M. (2021). Albanian Individual Taxpayers Perceptions and Determinants on Ethical Behavior Regarding Tax Compliance. Business Ethics and Leadership, 5(1), 66-80. [CrossRef]
- Wong, N., Rindfleisch, A., & Burroughs, J. E. (2003). Do reverse-worded items confound measures in cross-cultural consumer research? the case of the material values scale. Journal of Consumer Research, 30(1), 72-91. [Google Scholar]
- Xiang, Z., Schwartz, Z., Gerdes, J. H., & Uysal, M. (2015). What can big data and text analytics tell us about hotel guest experience and satisfaction? International Journal of Hospitality Management, 44, 120-130. [Google Scholar]
- Zolkover A., Terziev, V. (2020). The Shadow Economy: A Bibliometric Analysis. Business Ethics and Leadership, 4 (3), 107 -118. [Google Scholar]
|