Abstract

This study explores the impact of main idiosyncratic endogenous (Capital ratio, Diversification, Liquidity, Return on equity (ROE), Banks assets’ size) and macroeconomic exogenous (Inflation rate, GDP growth rate and HHI concentration index) determinants of the banking firm that influence banks’ cost efficiency. Using the SFA (Stochastic Frontier Approach) we estimate cost efficiency of the MENA banking sectors through a two-stage model: i) Including idiosyncratic and macroeconomic factors at a first stage under SFAW (SFA With) and ii) excluding these factors under SFAWO (SFA without) at a second stage. By using this method, SFAW versus SFAWO, we compare between the efficiency frontiers and scores obtained and understand the effect of the integration of main determinants on efficiency of banks in the MENA region. Using a sample of 240 observations for MENA banks collected from 18 banking sectors, we analyze whether these criteria had impact on cost efficiency throughout 1999-2017. We find that SFAW scores of efficiency are higher than SFAWO. Furthermore, our results show clearly the impact of determinants selected on cost efficiency frontier. Finally, notwithstanding ongoing fundamental changes in MENA’s banking industries, the empirical results, show that these inefficiencies can be explained by the idiosyncratic factors (Assets ‘size, liquidity, profitability, etc.) which are under the control of bank managers and the macroeconomic environment (economic growth, inflation) which largely depends on the economic, monetary and financial policies adopted in each country of the MENA region.

Keywords: (In) Efficiency, Stochastic frontier, Efficiency scores, Banks, MENA countries, Liberalization.

JEL Classification: C13, D24, G21, H21.

Cite as: Rizk, S. (2022). Impact of main idiosyncratic and exogenous factors on cost Efficiency: The case of MENA banking industries – SFA approach. Financial Markets, Institutions and Risks, 6(4), 51-59. https://doi.org/10.21272/fmir.6(4).51-59.2022

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License

References

1. Allen L and Rai, A (1996). Operational Efficiency in Banking: An International Comparison, Journal of Banking and Finance, 20(4), 655-672. [CrossRef]
2. Artus P. (2011b). Où apparaîtra la prochaine bulle ? In Les marchés sont-ils devenus raisonnables?, Pastré O. (sous la direction de). [Where will the next bubble appear?”, Have the markets become reasonable?] Le Cercle des économistes, Descartes & Cier.
3. Athanasoglou P., Delis M and Staikouras C. (2005). Determinants of Bank profitability in the South Eastern European region. [Link]
4. Battese, G. E., & Coelli, T. J. (1992). Frontier production functions, technical efficiency and panel data: With application to paddy farmers in India. Journal of Productivity Analysis, 3(1-2), 153–169. [Link]
5. Battese, G. E., & Corra, G. S. (1977). Estimation of a Production Frontier Model: With Application to the Pastoral Zone of Eastern, 21(3), 169–179. [CrossRef]
6. Benzai Y. (2016). Mesure de l’Efficience des Banques Commerciales Algériennes par les Méthodes Paramétriques et Non Paramétriques, These Pour l’obtention du grade de Docteur En Sciences Economiques Ecole doctorale: Management International Des Entreprises Option. [Measurement of the Efficiency of Algerian Commercial Banks by Parametric and Non-Parametric Methods, Theses For obtaining the degree of Doctor in Economics Doctoral School: International Business Management Option] Finance Internationale. [Link]
7. Berger, A. N., & Mester, L. J. (1997). Inside the Black Box: What Explains Differences in the Efficiencies of Financial Institutions? Journal of Banking & Finance, 21(7), 895–947. [CrossRef]
8. Berger A.N. & Humphrey D. (1997). Efficiency of financial institutions: International survey and directions of future research. European Journal of Operational Research, 97, 175-212. [Link]
9. Burkart O., Gonsard H. et Dietsch M. (1999). L’efficience coût et l’efficience profit des établissements de crédit français depuis 1993, Bulletin de la Commission Bancaire, 20 Avril, France. [Cost efficiency and profit efficiency of French credit institutions since 1993, Bulletin de la Commission Bancaire, 20 April, France]. [Link]
10. Calice, P.; Mohamed, N.; Behrndt, R. (2015). Improving the quality of financial intermediation in the Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC) Countries (Arabic). GCC engagement note; no. 2. Washington, D.C.: World Bank Group [Link]
11. Clark J.A. and Siems T. (2002). X-Efficiency in Banking: Looking beyond the Balance Sheet Journal of Money, Credit and Banking, 34, 4. [Link]
12. Clark J. and Speaker P. (1994). Economies of Scale and Scope in Banking: Evidence from a Generalized Translog Cost Function, Quarterly Journal of Business and Economics, 33(2), 3-25. [Link]
13. Das SK. And Drine I. (2011). Financial liberalization and banking sector efficiency in India: a Fourier Flexible functional form and stochastic frontier approach. International Business and Management. [CrossRef]
14. Dannon H. (2009). Efficacité et productivité des banques de la zone UEMOA dans un contexte de réformes financières une application de la méthode DEA, Cahiers du lab.RII documents de travail, Université de la littorale côte d’opale. [Efficiency and productivity of banks in the WAEMU zone in a context of financial reforms an application of the DEA method, Cahiers du lab. RII working documents, University of the littoral coast of Opal]. [Link]
15. Dietsch, M. (1992). Quel modèle de concurrence dans l’industrie bancaire? [What model of competition in the banking industry?] Revue Economique. [Crossref]
16. Fiorentino, et al. (2006). The cost efficiency of German banks: a comparison of SFA and DEA. [Link]
17. Fries, S. and Taci, A. (2005). Cost efficiency of banks in transition: Evidence from 289 banks in 15 post-communist countries, Journal of Banking & Finance. Elsevier. [CrossRef]
18. Fouopi, D. Song, J.S. (2016). Qualite des institutions, structure des propriétés et efficacité des banques dans la CEMAC, African Development Review, 28(4), 496–508. [CrossRef]
19. Gregorian, D. A. and Manole, Vlad, 2002; Determinants of Commercial Bank Performance in Transition: An Application of Data Envelopment Analysis. [Link]
20. Guidara, et al. (2010). Banks’ capital buffer, risk and performance in the Canadian banking system: Impact of business cycles and regulatory changes. Journal of Banking & Finance, 37(9), 3373-3387, [CrossRef]
21. Hugues, J.P. et al. (1998). Bank capitalization and cost: evidence of scale economies in risk management and signaling. Review of Economics and Statistics, 80, 314-325. [CrossRef]
22. Hughes, Joseph P. and Lang, William W. and Mester, Loretta J. and Moon, Choon-Geol. (1996). Efficient Banking under Interstate Branching. Journal of Money, Credit and Banking, 28(4), Part 2, 1045-1071. [CrossRef]
23. Jeitschko, T.D. et S.D. Jeung. (2005). Incentives for risk-taking in banking – A unified approach. Journal of Banking and Finance, 29, 759-777. [CrossRef]
24. Kablan S. (2007). Mesure de la performance des banques des pays en développement: le cas de l’UEMOA, Workshop du 2 au 7 Juin. [Measuring the performance of banks in developing countries: the case of WAEMU]. Workshop from June 2 to 7. [Link]
25. Kohler M.  (2015). Which banks are more risky? The impact of business models on bank stability, Journal of Financial Stability, 16, 212, [CrossRef]
26. Leibenstein H. (1970). Efficiency Wages, X-Efficiency, and Urban Unemployment, Economic Development and Planning, 168–185. [Link]
27. Lozano, V. and Dietsch. (2000). How the environment determines banking efficiency: A comparison between French and Spanish industries, Journal of Banking & Finance, 24(6), 985-1004. [CrossRef]
28. Mac Allister and Mac Manus (1993). Resolving the scale efficiency puzzle in banking. Journal of Banking & Finance, 17(2-3), 389-405. [CrossRef]
29. Poshakwale Sunil S. and Binsheng, Q. (2011). Competitiveness and Efficiency of the Banking Sector and Economic Growth in Egypt, African Development Review, 23(1), 99–120. [CrossRef]
30. Ray and Miller. (1990). Economies of Scale and Scope at Large Commercial Banks: Evidence from the Fourier Flexible Functional Form. Journal of Money. Credit and Banking
    28(2), 178-199. [CrossRef]
31. Rouabah G. (2009). Bank Productivity and Efficiency in Luxembourg: Malmquist Indices from a Parametric Output Distance Function. [Link]
32. Sherman, H.D. and Gold, F. (1985). Bank Branch Operating Efficiency. Evaluation with Data Envelopment Analysis. Journal of Banking and Finance, 9, 297-315.
33. Wrenches, S., and Lindley, J. (1977). Inputs, Outputs and Theory of Production Cost at Depository Financial Institutions. Journal of Finance, 32, 1251-1266. [CrossRef]
34. Song and Fouopi. (2016). Qualité des institutions, structure de propriété et efficacité des banques dans la CEMAC: Qualité des institutions, structure de propriété et efficacité des banques. [Institutional Quality, Ownership Structure and Bank Efficiency in CEMAC: Institutional Quality, Ownership Structure and Bank Efficiency]. African Development Review, 28(4), 496-508. [CrossRef]