Abstract

With each passing year, solving the demographic problem and the problem of population health is becoming more urgent, posing new challenges to politicians, producers and society. It has been proven that a person who cares about the quality of food, monitors the daily needs of vitamins and trace elements, consumes clean water, lives in an environmentally friendly area (away from industrial enterprises) is healthier than those who are unscrupulous in these aspects. The consequences of carelessness in health are the emergence of chronic diseases, the development of diabetes, obesity, cardiovascular disease, and more. In some places, the lack of a balanced diet and living in industrial regions also increases the mortality rate. The systematization of scientific background showed that both domestic and international scientists explore the role of environmental policy in public health. Existing theoretical and empirical research shows that the effective use of environmental tools could positively impact public health and life expectancy. However, the theoretical findings showed that foreign scholars have a more extensive interest in issues of environmental disasters and crises spreading in their countries. This article aims to confirm or refuse the hypothesis on the impact of environmental taxes and the environmental pollution level on people’s lives and health. The correlation-regression analysis allowed identifying a list of indicators that directly and inversely affect health and life expectancy. In the study, the dependent variable is the environmental tax revenues, which in most cases had a significant impact on health and life indicators (including the incidence of tuberculosis, cancer, diabetes, unintentional poisoning mortality, and life expectancy). It should be noted that environmental taxation should be considered in terms of ensuring the compensatory function and the amount of environmental damage which currently affects the living conditions. The obtained results could be provided as a scientific basis for further research on key determinants of improving public health and lives using the environmental taxation tools (environmental tax payments, additional financing of entrepreneurial activities that imitate green production, promotion of healthy eating, etc.).

Keywords: environmental taxation, life expectancy, demography, ecology, environment, morbidity.

JEL Classification: I15, H21, Q56.

Cite as: Tenytska, I., & Palienko, M. (2021). Environmental Taxes Impact on the Population Health Protection: Cross-Country Analysis. Health Economics and Management Review, 2(4), 78-86. https://doi.org/10.21272/hem.2021.4-08

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License

References

1. Ashe, M., Feldstein, L. M., Graff, S., Kline, R., Pinkas, D., & Zellers, L. (2007). Local venues for change: legal strategies for healthy environments. The Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics, 35(1), 138-147. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
2. Bowen, D. J., Barrington, W. E., & Beresford, S. A. A. (2015). Identifying the effects of environmental and policy change interventions on healthy eating. Retrieved from [Link]
3. Brownell, K. D., Kersh, R., Ludwig, D. S., Post, R. C., Puhl, R. M., Schwartz, M. B., & Willett, W. C. (2010). Personal responsibility and obesity: a constructive approach to a controversial issue. Health affairs, 29(3), 379-387. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
4. Chen, C., Chaudhary, A., & Mathys, A. (2019). Dietary change scenarios and implications for environmental, nutrition, human health and economic dimensions of food sustainability. Nutrients, 11(4), 856. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
5. Ecobusiness. (2015). The impact of the environmental conditions on the cancer formation. Retrieved from [Link]
6. Environment and health. (2022). European Environment Agency. Retrieved from [Link]
7. Li, A. M. (2017). Ecological determinants of health: food and environment on human health. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 24(10), 9002-9015. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
8. Moran, A. J., Gu, Y., Clynes, S., Goheer, A., Roberto, C. A., & Palmer, A. (2020). Associations between governmental policies to improve the nutritional quality of supermarket purchases and individual, retailer, and community health outcomes: An integrative review. International journal of environmental research and public health, 17(20), 7493. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
9. Myers, S. S., Gaffikin, L., Golden, C. D., Ostfeld, R. S., Redford, K. H., Ricketts, T. H., … & Osofsky, S. A. (2013). Human health impacts of ecosystem alteration. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 110(47), 18753-18760. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
10. National Academy of Medical Sciences of Ukraine (2021). Retrieved from [Link]
11. Nature Education. (2012). Population ecology. Retriewed from [Link]
12. Perdue, W. C., Stone, L. A., & Gostin, L. O. (2003). The built environment and its relationship to the public’s health: the legal framework. American journal of public health, 93(9), 1390-1394. [Google Scholar]
13. Sturm, R., & An, R. (2014). Obesity and economic environments. CA: a cancer journal for clinicians, 64(5), 337-350. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
14. Suchek, С. (2018). Environmental taxation: European experience and prospects for its application in Ukrainian realities. Economic Journal Lesya Ukrainka Eastern European National University, (3), 85–93. [Google Scholar]
15. United Nations. (2021). Population growth, environmental degradation and climate change. Retrieved from [Link]