Contents |
Authors:
Kasumbi Tshituka, ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6095-1110 The Saint-Louis Economic Research Laboratory (LARES), Gaston Berger University (GBU), Senegal
Official University of Mbujimayi, DR Congo
Pages: 83-91
Language: English
DOI: https://doi.org/10.21272/hem.2022.4-09
Received: 16.11.2022
Accepted: 16.12.2022
Published: 31.12.2022
Download: |
Views: |
Downloads: |
|
|
|
Abstract
Since the 2000s, the Democratic Republic of Congo has adopted national policies to phase out direct payment at the point of service to make health care more accessible. The objective of this study is to measure inequalities in access and financing of a subsidised health system. The measurement of inequalities in access and financing was applied to data from the Improved Monitoring for Action (N = 475 households in the Tshilenge health zone, East Kasai province, Democratic Republic of Congo), which is part of the evaluation of the performance of the health system through high-impact interventions for maternal, newborn and child health. The concentration curve and index (CI) method was used to assess the degree of inequality in the distribution of health care consumption and expenditures. A negative CI indicates a disproportionate concentration of subsidies among the poor, while a positive CI indicates that the subsidy is favourable to the rich; a CI of zero indicates perfect equity. In addition, the Kakwani Progressivity Index (KPI) was used to assess the progressivity of direct household spending on care. A positive value of the KPI indicates the progressivity of the system and a negative value its degressivity. The indices of concentration of use are respectively 0.034 for self-medication and -0.050 for use of a health facility, and the indices of standardised use are 0.00 in both cases. Comparison of the standardised and non-standardised concentration of use curves shows that standardisation reduces the differences between quintiles: there is horizontal equity of use after indirect standardisation. All Lorenz curves are below the standard of the living curve (the KPIs are significantly negative). Health expenditure is therefore all-regressive. The measurement of the degree of equity showed that there is imperfect equity in the use of care and that the system of financing care is inequitable and regressive. Direct household spending increases inequities in access. The contribution is greater for the lowest income groups. The low budget of the health sector prohibits universality and free access to services by producing a recourse to self-medication and renunciation of care.
Keywords: equity index, health care consumption, health financing, index decomposition.
JEL Classification: D63, E26, I14.
Cite as: Tshituka, K. (2022). Payment Subsidy and Equity in Access to Health Care: The Case of the Democratic Republic of Congo. Health Economics and Management Review, 3(4), 83-91. https://doi.org/10.21272/hem.2022.4-09
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
References
- Abu-Zaineh, M., Mataria, A., Luchini, S., & Moatti, J. P. (2008). Equity in health care financing in Palestine: the value-added of the disaggregate approach. Social Science & Medicine, 66(11), 2308-2320. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Abu-Zaineh, M., Mataria, A., Moatti, J. P., & Ventelou, B. (2011). Measuring and decomposing socioeconomic inequality in healthcare delivery: A microsimulation approach with application to the Palestinian conflict-affected fragile setting. Social Science & Medicine, 72(2), 133-141. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Allin, S. (2008). Does equity in healthcare use vary across Canadian provinces?. Healthcare Policy, 3(4), 83. [Google Scholar]
- Allin, S., Grignon, M., & Le Grand, J. (2010). Subjective unmet need and utilization of health care services in Canada: what are the equity implications?. Social science & medicine, 70(3), 465-472. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Balabanova, D., & McKee, M. (2002). Understanding informal payments for health care: the example of Bulgaria. Health policy, 62(3), 243-273. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Benoist, J. (1996). Soigner au pluriel: essais sur le pluralisme médical. Paris: Karthala. [Google Scholar]
- Cissé, B., Luchini, S., & Moatti, J. P. (2007). Progressivity and horizontal equity in health care finance and delivery: what about Africa?. Health policy, 80(1), 51-68. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Deaton, A. & Zaidi, S. (2002). Guidelines for Constructing Consumption Aggregates for Welfare Analysis. LSMS Working Paper, 135. [Google Scholar]
- Delcheva, E., Balabanova, D., & McKee, M. (1997). Under-the-counter payments for health care: Evidence from Bulgaria. Health Policy, 42(2), 89-100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Devaux, M. (2015). Income-Related Inequalities and Inequities in Health Care Services Utilization in 18 Selected OECD Countries.The European Journal of Health Economics, 16 (1), 21-33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Falkingham, J. (2004). Poverty, out-of-pocket payments and access to health care: evidence from Tajikistan. Social science & medicine, 58(2), 247-258. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Foreit, K. & Schreiner, M. (2011). Comparing Alternative Measures of Poverty: Assets-Based Wealth Index vs. Expenditures-Based Poverty Score. University of North Carolina Working Paper, 11-123. Retrieved from [Link]
- Jolliffe, I. T. (2002). Graphical representation of data using principal components. Principal component analysis, 78-110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jusot, F., Legal, R., Louvel, A., Pollak, C., & Shmueli, A. (2016). A quoi tient la solidarité de l’assurance maladie entre les hauts revenus et les plus modestes en France?. Revue française d’économie, 31(4), 15-62. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kakwani, N. C. (1980). Income inequality and poverty. New York: World Bank. [Google Scholar]
- Kakwani, N., Wagstaff, A., & Van Doorslaer, E. (1997). Socioeconomic inequalities in health: measurement, computation, and statistical inference. Journal of econometrics, 77(1), 87-103. [Google Scholar]
- Lindelow, M. (2006). Sometimes more equal than others: how health inequalities depend on the choice of welfare indicator. Health economics, 15(3), 263-279. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mackenbach, J. P., Kunst, A. E., Cavelaars, A. E., Groenhof, F., Geurts, J. J., & EU Working Group on Socioeconomic Inequalities in Health. (1997). Socioeconomic inequalities in morbidity and mortality in western Europe. The lancet, 349(9066), 1655-1659. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- McKenzie, D. J. (2005). Measuring inequality with asset indicators. Journal of population economics, 18(2), 229-260. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ministry of Planning. (2003). Acceleration Framework for MDGs 1, 2 and 4&5. Interim reports, Kinshasa.
- Ministry of Public Health of Kasaï-Oriental. (2013). Report of the 1st Enhanced Monitoring Session for Action in the ZS of Tshilenge, Mbujimayi.
- O’Donnell, O., van Doorslaer, E., Wagstaff, A., & Lindelow, M. (2008). Analyzing Health Equity Using Household Survey Data: A Guide to Techniques and Their Implementation. [Google Scholar]
- Regidor, E. (2004a). Measures of health inequalities: part 1. J. Epidemiol. Community Health, 58 (10), 858-861. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Regidor, E. (2004b). Measures of health inequalities: part 2. J. Epidemiol. Community Health, 58 (11), 900-903. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Regidor, E., Guallar-Castillon, P., Gutierrez-Fisac, J. L., Banegas, J. R., & Rodriguez-Artalejo, F. (2010). Socioeconomic variation in the magnitude of the association between self-rated health and mortality. Annals of epidemiology, 20(5), 395-400. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rochaix, L., & Tubeuf, S. (2009). Mesures de l’équité en santé. Revue économique, 60(2), 325-344. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Szende, A., & Culyer, A. J. (2006). The inequity of informal payments for health care: the case of Hungary. Health Policy, 75(3), 262-271. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- UNICEF. (2015). Organisation mondiale de la Santé, Groupe de la Banque mondiale et Division de la population du Département des affaires économiques et sociales des Nations Unies, Levels and Trends in Child Mortality, Report 2015. Retrieved from [Link]
- UNICEF. (2020). Evaluation sommative et formative du Cadre d’accélération des Objectifs du Millénaire pour le Développement (CAO) 4&5 en République Démocratique du Congo. Retrieved from [Link]
- USAID. (2018). Evaluation de l’impact des interventions de lutte contre le paludisme sur la mortalité toutes causes confondues chez les enfants de moins de cinq ans en République Démocratique du Congo de 2005 à 2015. Retrieved from [Link]
- Van Doorslaer, E., & Masseria, C. (2004). Income-related inequality in the use of medical care in 21 OECD countries (Vol. 14). Paris: OECD. [Google Scholar]
- Van Doorslaer, E., Masseria, C., & Koolman, X. (2006). Inequalities in access to medical care by income in developed countries. Cmaj, 174(2), 177-183. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Vyas, S., & Kumaranayake, L. (2006). Constructing socio-economic status indices: how to use principal components analysis. Health policy and planning, 21(6), 459-468. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wagstaff, A., & Van Doorslaer, E. (2000). Equity in health care finance and delivery. Handbook of health economics, 1, 1803-1862. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wagstaff, A., Paci, P., & Van Doorslaer, E. (1991). On the measurement of inequalities in health. Social science & medicine, 33(5), 545-557. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
|