Abstract

Active use of virtual electronic information environments – metaverses is the most perspective way of information and communication technologies development. In the meta-environment, traditional accounting objects undergo significant changes due to their intangible interpretation, which requires improving their accounting and auditing reflection. Accordingly, the purpose of this study is to improve the methodology and organization of accounting and auditing in the metaverse in terms of identification, recognition, and reflection in the accounting system of non-current intangible assets, goodwill of IT companies, NFT (non-fungible tokens), cryptocurrencies, sales costs and other objects in the meta-environment. To implement the purpose of scientific research, systemic, innovative, and institutional approaches and economic and mathematical modelling, bibliographic and comparative analysis have been used. Given the significant public distrust and active threats in the digital business, the need to introduce an audit in the metaverse to ensure the reliability, integrity, and legitimacy of information flows is justified. The possibility of recognizing from the standpoint of accounting and auditing of all virtual tools and objects of work that carry out the cycle in the meta-environment in the form of NFT, assets due to: uniqueness and separation from other accounting objects; opportunities for free purchase (sale) in the meta space, potential economic value in the case of retention and accumulation; reliable determination of value based on costs, sales contract or expert (market) assessment. It is proposed to classify NFT according to the criterion of useful life on non-current and current assets with the appropriate reflection in the composition of non-current and current intangible assets. The prospects of personalized marketing promotion of products (goods, services) in the metaverse with separate accounting of costs for the sale of tangible and intangible objects to ensure the reliability, analytical, and comparability of accounting information have been defined. As a result, a conclusion was formed on the expediency of transforming the reporting structure of meta-environment enterprises in terms of increasing the share of intangible assets and the potential absence of any tangible assets in terms of the full transfer of financial and economic activities in a virtual environment. The order of structuring the reporting of the enterprises of the metaverse needs further research.

Keywords: accounting, audit, intangible assets, NFT, metaverse, resources, virtual digital information environment, IT companies.

JEL Classification: M10, M40, M41.

Cite as: Zadorozhnyi, Z.-M., Muravskyi, M., Humenna-Derij, M., & Zarudna, N (2022). Innovative Accounting and Audit of the Metaverse Resources Marketing and Management of Innovations, 4, 10-19. https://doi.org/10.21272/mmi.2022.4-02

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License

References

1. Akkus, H. T., Gursoy, S., Dogan, M., & Demir, A. B. (2022). Metaverse and metaverse cryptocurrencies (meta coins): bubbles or future?. Journal of Economics Finance and Accounting, 9(1), 22-29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
2. Al Gnbri, M. K. (2021). Accounting and Auditing in the Metaverse World from a Virtual Reality Perspective: Future research. Retrieved from [Link]
3. Augmented and virtual reality (AR/VR) forecast spending worldwide in 2020, by segment. Retrieved from [Link]
4. Fernandez, P. (2022). Facebook, Meta, the metaverse and libraries. Library Hi Tech News. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
5. Hemmati, M. (2022). The Metaverse: An Urban Revolution Effect of the Metaverse on the Perceptions of Urban Audience. 2. 49-56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
6. Hollensen, S., Kotler, P., & Opresnik, M. (2022). Metaverse – the new marketing universe. Journal of Business Strategy. ahead-of-print. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef].
7. Hughes, I. (2022). The Metaverse: Is it the Future? ITNOW, 64(1), 22-23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
8. Lin, W.. (2022). Creating Business Value in Metaverse. Retrieved from [Link]
9. Metaverse market revenue worldwide from 2021 to 2030. Retrieved from [Link]
10. Fortune Business Insights. (2022). Metaverse market size.. Retrieved from [Link]
11. Number of jobs enhanced by augmented reality (AR) and virtual reality (VR) worldwide from 2019 to 2030. Retrieved from [Link]
12. Osivand, S. (2021). Investigation of Metaverse in cryptocurrency. GSC Advanced Research and Reviews. 9. 125-128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
13. Seidel, S., Berente, N., Nickerson, J., & Yepes, G. (2022, January). Designing the Metaverse. In HICSS (pp. 1-10). [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
14. Silalahi, A. (2022). Metaverse and Digital economy: Its prospects and challenges. [Google Scholar]
15. Taylor, S., & Soneji, S. (2022). Bioinformatics and the Metaverse: Are We Ready? Frontiers in Bioinformatics, 2, 863676. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
16. Tunca, S., Sezen, B., & Balcioglu, Y. (2022). Twitter analysis for metaverse literacy. Retrieved from [Link]
17. Zadorozhnyi, Z.-M., Muravskyi, V. V., Shevchuk, O. A. & Sudyn Y. A. (2018). Management accounting of the settlements with contractors in innovative environment of business communications. Marketing and Management of Innovations, 2, 103-112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
18. Zadorozhnyi, Z.-M., Sudyn, Y. & Muravskyi V. (2018). Goodwill Assessment in Enterprise Management: Innovative Approaches Using Computer and Communication Technologies. Marketing and Management of Innovations, 4, 43-53. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]