Contents |
Authors:
L.L. Kalinichenko, Kharkiv National University of Civil Engineering and Architecture (Kharkiv, Ukraine)
Pages: 169-179
Language: Ukrainian
DOI: https://doi.org/10.21272/mmi.2016.4-14
Download: |
Views: |
Downloads: |
|
|
|
Abstract
The aim of the article. The author notes that by Studying the work of project management, we can say that researchers distinguish effectiveness from the standpoint of professional activities at the project and organizational and psychological climate activities.
The results of the analysis. Professionally efficiency is, first and foremost, the focus of the entire team at the end result, initiative and creative approach to solving problems. From the standpoint of organizational and psychological climate effective is such a command, in which: informal atmosphere; the objective is clear and accepted; the members listen to each other; discuss the issues, involving all members; conflicts and disagreements are present but are expressed and centered around ideas and methods, not personalities; the group is aware that does, decisions are based on consensus, not on majority vote. Under these conditions, the team not only successfully fulfills its mission, but also meets the personal and interpersonal needs of their members, resulting in the output result, which has implemented project with the planned performance as a measure of team activity.
Effective management of the project team depends largely on the efficiency of project management, innovation and effective use of investment. The following article in the graphic scheme of forming an effective project team gives an idea of what the process is gradual and multidimensional, requires the project manager skills to rally the team, allocate responsibilities, set goals and monitor the activities of each member of the team.
Conclusions and directions of further researches. In general, the novelty of this article is that the author describes a technique that enables to assess the effectiveness of the management team working on the project, taking into account the time that is, the leaders for team building, cohesion of its members, raising the level of competence of experts. This technique is simple in terms of the research process, but informative, it provides an opportunity to determine not only overall efficiency but also to evaluate the effectiveness of individual controls.
Keywords: management, project, team, formation, efficiency, evaluation
JEL Classification: J29, L14.
Cite as: Kalinichenko, L. (2016). Development and evaluation of project management effectiveness. Marketing and Management of Innovations, 4, 169-179. https://doi.org/10.21272/mmi.2016.4-14
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
References
- Akulova, V.B., & Rudakov, M.N. (1995). Teoriia priniatiia reshenii: matematicheskie metody analiza ekspertnykh otsenok [The decision theory: mathematical methods of analysis of expert assessments]. Moscow: Statistika [in Russian].
- Arefev, A. (2015). Standarty PMI po upravleniiu prohrammami i portfeliami [The PMI standards for managing programs and portfolios]. www.pmi.ru. Retrieved from http://www.pmi.ru/articles/ files/Standarts.pdf [in Russian].
- Beshelev, S.D., & Gurvich, F.G. (1980). Matematiko-statisticheskie metody ekspertnykh otsenok [Mathematical-statistical methods of expert assessments]. Moscow: Statistika [in Russian].
- Bushueva, N.S. (2010). Upravlinnia proektamy ta prohramamy organizatsiinoho rozvytku [Managing projects and programs for organizational development]. Kyiv: Sammit- Kniga [in Ukrainian].
- Emelianova, O.V. (2009). Modeli ta metody planuvannia innovatsinykh proektiv i prohram z urahuvanniam alternativnykh variantiv vykonannia robit [Models and methods of planning of innovative projects and programmes, taking into account alternative variants of performance of works]. Extended abstract of candidate’s thesis. Kharkiv [in Ukrainian].
- Latkin, M.O. (2015). Metodolohichni osnovy stvorennia systemy upravlinnia ryzykamy proektiv pidpryiemstva [Methodological bases of creation of systems of risk management projects of the enterprise]. Extended abstract of Doctor’s thesis. Kyiv [in Ukrainian].
- Timofeeva, V.O., & Chumachenko, I.V. (2015). Modeliuvannia protsesiv v ekonomitsi ta upravlinni proektamy z vykorytanniam novykh informatsiinykh tehnolohii [Modeling of processes in Economics and project management using new information technologies]. Kharkiv: HNURE [in Ukrainian].
- Haraziy, A.V. (2016). Modeli i metody vubora metodolohii upravleniia [Models and methods choice of methodology of management]. Kharkov: Harkovskyi natsionalnyi universytet horodskoho hoziaistva im. A.N. Beketova [in Russian].
- Chervanov, D.M. (2003). Menedzhment investitsiinoi diialnosti pidpriemstv [Management of investment activity of enterprises]. Kyiv: Znannia Pres [in Ukrainian].
- Petersen, Christine. (2013). The Practical Guide to Project Management. Bookboon [in English].
- Mounir, A. Ajam. (2014). Project Management Templates. Bookboon [in English].
- Svein-Arne, Jessen. (2012). Project Leadership – Step by Step. Bookboon [in English].
- MTI company. (n.d.). www.mti.ua. Retrieved from http://www.mti.ua/ru [in Russian].
|