Abstract

Increasing the risks of climate change, natural and man-made disasters, as well as the manifestation of their negative environmental and economic consequences at the national and supranational levels, envisages the introduction of the concept of sustainable development and the United Nations Millen-nium Development Goals. The implementation of large-scale environmental projects in the form of joint implementation projects, public-private partnerships, distribution agreements, etc. is possible only if an effective system of managing these projects is formed at the national and supranational levels. The object of the study is a public-private partnership. The subject of the study is the increase of the effectiveness of national environmental projects implementation.

Keywords: public-private partnership, national environmental projects, agreement on the division of products, shale gas.

JEL Classification: Q01.

Cite as: Spremberg, E., Tykhenko, V., Lopa, L. (2017). Public-Private Partnership in the Implementation of National Environmental Projects. SocioEconomic Challenges, 1(4), 73-81. DOI: 10.21272sec.1(4).73-81.2017

References

1. 10 nailuchshikh gosudarstvennykh instrumentov po sokrashcheniyu vybrosov parnikovykh gazov v Severnoy Yevrope [10 best state instruments to reduce greenhouse gas emissions in Northern Europe]. Available at [http://www.airclim.org/sites/default/аles/documents/APC31-The-10-best-climate-mitigation-measures-in-Northern-Europe.pdf.
2. Annual report of the Joint Implementation Supervisory Committee to the Conference of the Parties serving as the Meeting of the Parties to the Kyoto Protocol (2014). Lima, 1–12 December 2014, 12 p.
3. Bamberger, M. (2012). Impacts of Gas Drilling on Human and Animal Health. Available at http://www.psehealthyenergy.org/data/Bamberger_Oswald_NS22_in_press.pdf
4. Blake, Martin, Wijetilaka, Shehan (26 February 2015). 5 tips to grow your start-up using SWOT analysis. Sydney. Retrieved 10 August 2015.
5. Collins, Rob (2010). A Graphical Method for Exploring the Business Environment (PDF). Retrieved 19 June 2014.
6. Global reach: World Bank Data. Available at http://maps.worldbank.org/p2e/mcmap/map.html?code=&level=&indicatorcode=0553&title=Global&org=ibrd.
7. Inderst, G. et al. (2012). Defining and Measuring Green Investments: Implications for Institutional Investors, Asset Allocations. OECD Working Papers on Finance, Insurance and Private Pensions. OECD Publishing, No. 24, 55 p.
8. Introduction to Environmental Management Systems and related Standards. Available at http://www.snh.org.uk/publications/on-line/advisorynotes/46/46.htm.
9. ISO 14000  Environmental Management. Available at http://www.iso.org/iso/home/standards/management-standards/iso14000.htm
10. Lawrence P. Carr, Alfred J. Nanni Jr. (28 July 2009). Delivering Results: Managing What Matters. Springer Science & Business Media. p. 44. ISBN 978-1-4419-0621-2.
11. The Millennium Development Goals Report 2014: United Nations, New York. Available at http://www.un.org/millenniumgoals/2014%20MDG%20report/MDG%202014%20English%20web.pdf.
12. Osita, Christian, Onyebuchi, Idoko, Justina, Nzekwe (31 January 2014). Organization’s stability and productivity: the role of SWOT analysis (PDF). International Journal of Innovative and Applied Research, 2(9), 23-32. Retrieved 17 March 2016.
13. PESTLE analysis history and application, CIPD. Retrieved 2009-10-21.
14. Richardson, J. (2017). A Brief Intellectual History of the STEPE Model or Framework (i.e., the Social, Technical, Economic, Political, and Ecological).
15. Schmieder-Ramirez, J. and Mallette, L. (2015). Using the SPELIT Analysis Technique for Organizational Transitions. Chapter 28 of Education Applications and Developments edited by Mafalda Carmo, Science Press, Retrieved 2015-08-21.
16. Stavins, R. N. (2001). Experience with Market-Based Environmental Policy Instruments. Discussion Paper 01–58, 92 p.
17. The U.S. oil and gas boom has had a modest economic impact – so far. – Available at http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/wonkblog/wp/2013/04/23/the-oil-and-gas-boom-has-had-a-surprisingly-small-impact-on-the-u-s-economy.
18. The Use of Economic Instruments in Environmental Policy: Opportunities and Challenges: United Nations Publication (2004). 121 p.
19. UNEP Project manual: formulation, approval, monitoring and evaluation. Available at http://www.unep.org/pcmu/project_manual/chapters.asp.
20. Using the market for cost-effective environmental policy: Market-based instruments in Europe / European Environment Agency (EEA). (2006). Copenhagen, 46 р.
21. Hubanova, O. R. (2010). Orhanizatsiyno-ekonomichnyy mekhanizm stymulyuvannya osvoyennya tekhnohenno-resursnoho potentsialu Ukrayiny: avtoref. dys. [Organizational-economic mechanism of stimulation of development of technogenic-resource potential of Ukraine: abstract of a thesis]. Odesa: B.v., 36 p.
22. Mishenin, Y. E. et al. (2013). Derzhavno-pryvatne partnerstvo yak instrument formuvannya rynku ekosystemnykh posluh. V Determinanty sotsialʹno-ekonomichnoho rozvytku pidpryyemstv: monohrafiya [State-private partnership as a tool for the formation of the market of ecosystem services. In Determinants of socio-economic development of enterprises: a monograph]. Kharkiv: TOV Disa Plyus, pp. 50-64.
23. Netradytsiynyy i neznaydenyy Mif pro velyki zapasy slantsevoho hazu v SSHA [Non-traditional and undiscovered Myth about large shale gas reserves in the US]. Available at http://necu.org.ua/netradytsiynyy-i-neznaydenyy-mif-pro-velyki-zapasy-deshevoho-slantsevoho-hazu-v-ssha/.
24. Povil’nyi rukh v nikudy: rozvytok slantsevoho hazu v Yevropi [Slow motion to nowhere: the development of shale gas in Europe]. Available at http://necu.org.ua/povilnyy-ruh-v-nikudy-rozvytok-slantsevoho-hazu-v-evropi/.
25. United Nations (2008). Practical guidance on effective governance in the public-private partnership. 128 p.
26. Pro uhody pro rozpodil produktsiyi: Zakon Ukrayiny vid 14 veresnya 1999 r. Vidomosti Verkhovnoyi Rady Ukrayiny (VVR) [About product-sharing agreements: Law of Ukraine dated September 14, 1999] (1999). Bulletin of the Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine, 44, p. 391.
27. Rassadnikova, S. I. (2012). Priorytetni napryamy derzhavno-pryvatnoho partnerstva u rozbudovi ekolohichnoyi infrastruktury Ekonomichni innovatsiyi [Priority directions of public-private partnership in the development of ecological infrastructure]. Odessa: Ipride National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine. Odesa: IPREED NAN Ukrayiny, 48, pp. 192-203.
28. Slantseva uhoda #2. Tekst URP z Chevron [Slate Agreement No. 2. The text of the PSA with Chevron] [Electronic resource]. Available at http://www.epravda.com.ua/publications/2013/06/12/379523/].
29. Ukrayina na rozryv: Vydobutok netradytsiynoho hazu [Ukraine on the gap: extraction of unconventional gas]. Natsionalʹnyy ekolohichnyy tsentr Ukrayiny [National Ecological Center of Ukraine], 2014, 42 p.
30. Fakty pro frekinh: Shcho vam treba znaty pro vydobuvannya hazu netradytsiynykh pokladiv [Facts about fracturing: What you need to know about gas extraction of non-traditional deposits] (2014). National Ecological Center of Ukraine, 4 p.
31. Frolov S. M. et al. (2013). Derzhavno-pryvatne partnerstvo yak mekhanizm investuvannya innovatsiynykh tekhnolohiy povodzhennya z vidkhodamy [Public-private partnership as a mechanism for investing in innovative waste management technologies]. Biznes-inform, 3, 181-185.