Md. Ayub Ali, ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5362-0858
LL.M., DU, Assistant Professor, Department of Law & Justice, Southeast University, Bangladesh
The article summarizes the arguments and counterarguments within the scientific debate on the application of the principles and practices of international law to assess the compensation of a State’s damage as a result of the illegal acts and / or inaction of another State. The main purpose of the study is to analyze the causes of the crisis against the Rohingya ethnic group and to assess its likely devastating effects on Bangladesh. The systematization of literary sources and approaches to the settlement of international disputes of this kind indicate that in practice there are two approaches that can be used to file and pursue a claim for redress for Myanmar. The urgency of solving this scientific problem is that, as a neighboring country, Bangladesh has faced the need to resolve the issue of refugees from the region and accordingly takes an active part in resolving this protracted conflict caused by Myanmar’s actions against the Rohingya ethnic group, the persecuted ethnic minority in the world. According to the Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees, the unlawful and brutal actions of the Myanmar army have forced more than a million Rohingya refugees to flee their homes and migrate to Bangladesh, causing enormous negative effects on its economy, the environment and the rule of law. The study confirms that, under international law, Bangladesh has the right to sue Myanmar for unfair and cruel oppression of Rohingya rights. During the course of the study, the author has used such sources as periodicals, UN reports and documents from Rohingya human rights organizations. The principles of international law on state liability are used as a methodological tool for assessing Myanmar’s liability. The results of the study may be useful for policymakers exploring the strategy of addressing the challenges of Myanmar’s compensation claims, as well as for international organizations that are addressing the Rohingya crisis.
Keywords: cruelty, international wrongdoing, imperative norm, compensation, state responsibility, Myanmar, Bangladesh, Rohingya national migration, refugee rights, ethnic minorities, damages lawsuit.
JEL Classification: K33.
Cite as: Ali, Md. Ayub (2020). Bangladesh’s Claim for Reparation from Myanmar due to Rohingya Influx: Options and Challenges. SocioEconomic Challenges, 4(1), 65-74. http://doi.org/10.21272/sec.4(1).65-74.2020.
- Abrar, C. (2010). Repatriation of Rohingya Refugees. Retrieved from www.burmalibrary.org.
- ACHPR (2011). Beneficiaries of Late Norbert and Others v. Burkina Faso. Retrieved from http://en.african-court.org/images/Cases/Judgment/Nobert%20Zongo%20Judgment-%20English.pdf.
- Ahmed, I. (2010). The Plight of the Stateless Rohingyas: Response of the State, Society and the International Community, University Press Limited, Dhaka University. Retrieved from http://www.uplbooks.com/book/plight-stateless-rohingyas-responses-state-society-international-community.
- Alam, M. (2018). How the Rohingya crisis is affecting Bangladesh and why it matters, the Washington Post. Retrieved from https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/monkey-cage/wp/2018/02/12/how-the-rohingya-crisis-is-affecting-bangladesh-and-why-it-matters/.
- Bhuiyan, Humayun Kabir (2019). UNHCR: Rohingya repatriation process a long haul, the Dhaka Tribune. Retrieved from https://www.dhakatribune.com/bangladesh/rohingya-crisis/2019/03/21/unhcr-rohingya-repatriation-process-a-long-haul.
- Bhuiyan, Humayun Kabir (2019). Rohingya repatriation: Myanmar ignoring deal for 19 months, Dhaka Tribune, retrieved from https://www.dhakatribune.com/bangladesh/rohingya-crisis/2019/08/24/rohingya-repatriation-myanmar-ignoring-deal-for-19-months.
- BROUK (2014). Myanmar’s 1982 Citizenship Law and Rohingya. Retrieved from http://burmacampaign.org.uk/media/Myanmar%E2%80%99s-1982-Citizenship-Law-and-Rohingya.pdf.
- Brownlie, I. (1998). Principles of Public International Law, 9th ed., London, Oxford. Available at https://global.oup.com/academic/product/brownlies-principles-of-public-international-law-9780198737445?cc=us&lang=en&.
- Brownlie, I. (2002). Basic Documents in International Law, 5th ed. Retrieved from https://trove.nla.gov.au/work/10501705.
- Brownlie, I.(1983). System of the Law of Nations: State Responsibility, Oxford, Clarendon Press. Retrieved from https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/american-journal-of-international-law/article/system-of-the-law-of-nations-state-responsibility-part-i-by-ian-brownlie-new-york-clarendon-press-oxford-university-press-1983-pp-xvi-302-index-4750/A654331AA21A00C0AF3018DA6586BA22.
- Centre for Policy Dialogue, (2018). Economic Implications of the Rohingya Crisis for Bangladesh and National Budget FY2019. Retrieved from https://cpd.org.bd.
- Commentaries, ILC Draft Articles on Responsibility of States for Internationally Wrongful Acts 2001, available at http://legal.un.org/ilc/texts/instruments/english/commentaries/9_6_2001.pdf.
- Grotius, H. (1625). The Law of War and Peace. Lonung Institute. Retrieved from https://lonang.com/library/reference/grotius-law-war-and-peace/.
- Haque, E. (2012). Rohingya Refugee Paradox: Casting an Inner Eye. Asian Journal of Research in Social Science and Humanities, 2(12), pages 97-108. Retrieved from http://www.aijsh.org.
- IACHR (2006). Goiburu and Others v. Paraguay. Retrieved from http://www.corteidh.or.cr/docs/casos/articulos/seriec_153_ing.pdf.
- IACHR (2008). Ticona Estrada and Others v. Bolivia. Retrieved from http://www.corteidh.or.cr/docs/casos/articulos/seriec_191_ing.pdf.
- ICJ (1980). United States Diplomatic and Consular Staff in Tehran v. Iran, Judgment. Retrieved from https://www.icj-cij.org/en/case/64.
- ICJ (1982). La Grande case (Germany v. the United States of America). Retrieved from https://www.icj-cij.org/en/case/104.
- ICJ (1986). Military and Paramilitary Activities in and against Nicaragua (Nicaragua v. United States of America). Retrieved from https://www.icj-cij.org/en/case/70/judgments.
- ICJ (1997). Gabčíkovo-Nagyamaros Project (Hungary/Slovakia). Retrieved from https://www.icj-cij.org/en/case/92.
- ICJ (2001). Germany v. the United States of America. Retrieved from http://www.worldcourts.com/icj/eng/decisions/2001.06.27_lagrand.htm.
- ICTY (1999). Prosecutor v. Dusko Tadic (Appeal Judgement), IT-94-1-A, ILM, 38(6). Available at https://www.icty.org/en/case/tadic.
- International Law Commission, Draft Articles on Responsibility of States for Internationally Wrongful Acts, November 2001, Supplement No. 10 (A/56/10), chp.IV.E.1, available at: https://www.refworld.org/docid/3ddb8f804.html.
- Joint Response Plan for Rohingya Humanitarian Crisis (January-December, 2019). Retrieved from http://reporting.unhcr.org/sites/default/files/2019%20JRP%20for%20Rohingya%20Humanitarian%20Crisis%20%28February%202019%29.comp_.pdf.
- Khasawneh, Bisher Hani (2007). An Appraisal of The Right of Return And compensation of Jordanian Nationals of Palestinian Refugee Origin and Jordan’s Right, under International Law, to bring claims relating thereto, on their behalf to and against Israel and to seek compensation as a host state in light of The conclusion of the Jordan-Israel Peace Treaty of 1994. Retrieved from http://etheses.lse.ac.uk/2131/1/U613363.pdf.
- New Mandala (2014). Rohingya and national identities in Burma. Retrieved from https://www.newmandala.org/the-rohingya-and-national-identities-in-burma/.
- Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights, (2010). Report of the Special Rapporteur on the situation of human rights in Myanmar. Retrieved from https://www.ohchr.org/EN/…/A-HRC-37-70.docx.
- PCIJ (1928). Chowrzo Factory Case (Germany vs. Polland). Retrieved from https://www.icj-cij.org/files/permanent-court-of-international-justice/serie_A/A_09/28_Usine_de_Chorzow_Competence_Arret.pdf.
- Radio Free Asia, (2010). Who are the Rohingya? Retrieved from https://www.rfa.org/english/multimedia/rohingyaPage 04122010151733.html/RohingyaFactSheet-04132010102750.html.
- Rahman, M. (2009). International Law in a Changing World, Dhaka. University Press Limited.
- Rahman, Utpala (2010). The Rohingya Refugee: A Security Dilemma for Bangladesh, Journal of Immigrant & Refugee Studies, 8(2), 233-239, DOI: 10.1080/15562941003792135.
- Slim, Field-Marshal Viscount William (2009). Defeat Into Victory: Battling Japan in Burma and India, 1942–1945. London: Pan. ISBN 13: 9780815410225.
- Smith, M. (1991). Burma: Insurgency and the politics of Ethnicity. London. Zed Books. ISBN: 9781856496605. https://journals.lib.unb.ca/index.php/JCS/article/view/4301/4904
- Starke, J.G. (1989). Introduction to International Law, Butterworth, 10th ed. ISBN 13: 9780406659552.
- The Guardian, (2017). Text book Example of Ethnic Cleansing. Retrieved from https://www.theguardian.com/world/2017/sep/11/un-myanmars-treatment-of-rohingya-textbook-example-of-ethnic-cleansing.
- UN Reports of International Arbitral Awards (1926). L. F. H. Neer and Pauline Neer, (U.S.A.) V. United Mexican States, Vol. 4, available at http://legal.un.org/riaa/cases/vol_IV/60-66.pdf.
- United Nations Human Rights Council (2018, August). Report of the detailed findings of the Independent International Fact Finding Mission on Myanmar. Retrieved from https://www.ohchr.org/Documents/HRBodies/HRCouncil/FFM-Myanmar/A_HRC_39_CRP.2.pdf.