Abstract

This paper deals with bibliometric analysis and visualization of theory development of funding social housing considering connection of sociological and economic research. The main purpose of the research is to identify dominant trends in cross-sectoral research related to the development of the theory of funding social housing considering connection of sociological and economic research. Systematization literary sources and approaches for solving the problem of funding social housing indicates that the bibliometric analysis of scientific papers indexed in the Scopus database based on using VOSViewer software package and the Scopus scientometric database analysis were not applied enough in the scientific area of this research. Investigation of the topic about research activity in funding social, affordable, and public housing emphasizing the connection of sociological and economic patterns is carried out in the following logical sequence: introduction and proving the relevance of research problem; literature revue with generalization and analysis of scholars experience of bibliometric analysis and visualization in general and in funding social, public, and affordable housing in particular; the main part of investigation related directly to the Scopus scientometric database analysis and the bibliometric analysis of scientific papers indexed in the Scopus database based on using VOSViewer; conclusion of research. Methodological tools of the research methods were logical generalization and scientific abstraction, statistical and structural analysis, comparative, and graphical analysis using Excel 2010 software, Scopus database tools and VOSViewer software package v.1.6.16. The object of the Scopus database analysis was a sample of 5 385 scientific articles indexed in the Scopus scientometric database for the period from 1948 to 2020, and generated by the following keywords for search request: ‘funding social housing’, ‘financing social housing’, ‘social housing finance’, ‘funding affordable housing’, ‘financing affordable housing’, ‘affordable housing finance’, ‘funding public housing’, ‘financing public housing’, and ‘public housing finance’ (limit in 2020 is due to the availability of information on open portal of Scopus database and incomplete data for 2021). The top trends of theory development of funding social, affordable, and public housing were identified. The Scopus scientometric database analysis showed that the theory of funding social, affordable, and public housing is at the stage of formation and rapid development – about 60–70 % of the total number of publications for the period from 1948 to 2020 (for more than 70 years) were published in the last 10 years (and about 30–40 % – in the last 5 years). The total trend of number of articles dynamics about funding social, affordable, and public housing indexed in Scopus database in 1990-2020 was built. The accent was put on some significant increase peaks of publishing activity during investigated period connected with the economic and financial crisis in 2007, currency fluctuations, the COVID-19 crisis, etc. The structural and functional clustering of the development of the theory of funding social housing was carried out considering connection of sociological and economic research. The received conclusions can be useful for scholars in socioeconomics, public and private investors in social and affordable housing.

Keywords: affordable housing, finance, funding, housing allowances, inclusive economy, public and private investment, public housing, social housing, social rental dwellings, subsidies.

JEL Classification: A13, O18, R21.

Cite as: Svitlana Ianchuk. (2021). Bibliometric Analysis And Visualization Of Funding Social Housing: Connection Of Sociological And Economic Research. SocioEconomic Challenges, 5(1), 144-153. https://doi.org/10.21272/sec.5(1).144-153.2021

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License

References

1. Kiss, L. B. (2020). The Importance of Business Partnership on the World Wide Web. Business Ethics and Leadership, 4(1), 68-79. DOI: http://doi.org/10.21272/bel.4(1).68-79.2020.
2. Kondratenko, V., Okopnyk, O., Ziganto, L., & Kwilinski, A. (2020). Innovation Development of Public Administration: Management and Legislation Features. Marketing and Management of Innovations, 1, 87-94. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21272/mmi.2020.1-06.
3. Liu, Y., Wang, P., He, Z., & Dong, J. (2020). Real estate rental market: a 10-year bibliometric-based review. Economic Research-Ekonomska Istraživanja. Published Online. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/1331677X.2020.1848605.
4. Molotok, I. F. (2020). Bibliometric and Trend Analysis of Budget Transparency. Business Ethics and Leadership, 4(2), 116-122. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21272/bel.4(2).116-122.2020.
5. Nazir, F. A., Edwards, D. J., Shelbourn, M., Martek, I., Thwala, W. D. D., & El-Gohary, H. (2020). Comparison of modular and traditional UK housing construction: a bibliometric analysis. Journal of Engineering, Design and Technology, 19(1), 164-186. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/JEDT-05-2020-0193.
6. OECD (2020). Housing and Inclusive Growth. OECD Publishing, Paris. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1787/6ef36f4b-en.
7. OECD (2020). Social housing: A key part of past and future housing policy. Employment, Labour and Social Affairs Policy Briefs. OECD, Paris. Available at: http://oe.cd/social-housing-2020.
8. OECD Housing Project. (n.d.). Affordable housing. Available at: http://www.oecd.org/housing/topics/affordable-housing/.
9. Ranjbar-Sahraei, B., & Negenborn R. R. (2017). Research Positioning & Trend Identification – a data-analytics toolbox. AIDA project. Available at: https://d1rkab7tlqy5f1.cloudfront.net.
10. Samoilikova, A. V. (2020). Finansova polityka zabezpechennya innovatsiynoho rozvytku Ukrayiny [Financial policy of providing the innovation development of Ukraine]. The dissertation for obtaining a candidate degree in Economics in specialty 08.00.08 Money, Finance and Credit. Sumy State University, Sumy. [in Ukrainian]. Available at: https://essuir.sumdu.edu.ua/bitstream-download/123456789/80856/1/diss_Samoilikova.pdf.
11. Scopus (n.d.). Scopus database tools. Start exploring. Available at: https://www.scopus.com.
12. Van Eck, N. J., & Waltman, L. (2010). Software survey: VOSviewer, a computer program for bibliometric mapping. Scientometrics, 84(2), 523-538. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-009-0146-3.
13. Van Eck, N. J., & Waltman, L. (2020). VOSviewer Manual. Available at: https://www.vosviewer.com/getting-started#vosviewer-manual.
14. Yelnikova, Y., & Golochalova, I. (2020). Social Bonds as an Instrument of Responsible Investment. Financial Markets, Institutions and Risks, 4(4), 119-128. https://doi.org/10.21272/fmir.4(4).119-128.2020.
15. Zolkover, A., & Terziev, V. (2020). The Shadow Economy: A Bibliometric Analysis. Business Ethics and Leadership, 4(3), 107-118. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21272/bel.4(3).107-118.2020.