Contents |
Authors:
Ana-Maria Holobiuc, ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9329-9758 PhD Candidate, Bucharest University of Economic Studies, Romania
Pages: 26-34
Language: English
DOI: https://doi.org/10.21272/sec.5(2).26-34.2021
Received: 23.03.2021
Accepted: 25.05.2021
Published: 25.06.2021
Download: |
Views: |
Downloads: |
|
|
|
Abstract
Being established from the initiative of six visionary countries in the second half of the 20th century, the European Economic Community has shifted the history of the European continent by promoting economic collaboration and political stability. Given its initial success, the regional group has quickly evolved from customs union to Economic and Monetary Union, comprising nowadays twenty-seven European countries. Although the European Union has successfully managed political, economic, social and even sanitary turmoil, the stability of the European architecture continues to be threatened by the heterogeneity of its members. In this respect, one of the main challenges for the European Union in its current composition aims the convergence of the economic performance between countries and regions. The purpose of this paper is to study the economic growth patterns in the European Union during 2000 and 2019, also conducting a comparative analysis between New and Old Member States. In order to capture the European economic landscape, the methodology was based on conditional β-convergence and the estimates were conducted by using ordinary least squares and generalized least squares with fixed effects. We have tried to find the relationship between the lagged value of GDP per capita and the subsequent growth rates, but also to study the influence of macroeconomic and social-related variables. By estimating regressions based on panel data, we have found evidence in favor of income convergence in the European Union, based on the inverse relationship between the lagged value of GDP per capita and the annual growth rates. Moreover, the comparative analysis between the New and Old Members illustrated that convergence was stronger in the latter group, given the sound macroeconomic and social environment. The empirical analysis suggested that the economic growth process both at aggregate and subgroup level was enhanced by investment, exports of goods and services, sound public finances and the increase of percentage of population with tertiary education. Consequently, in order to increase the cohesion between Members and to avoid separatist movements, the European decision-makers should strengthen the macroeconomic and social frameworks, maintaining a sustainable economic growth trajectory for both the New Members from Central and Eastern Europe and the Old Member States.
Keywords: European Union, economic growth, β-convergence, panel data analysis.
JEL Classification: O40, O52, O57.
Cite as: Holobiuc, A.-M. (2021). Determinants of economic growth in the European Union. An empirical analysis of conditional convergence. SocioEconomic Challenges, 5(2), 26-34. https://doi.org/10.21272/sec.5(2).26-34.2021
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
References
- Barro, R. J. & Sala-i-Martin, X. (1992). Convergence. Journal of Political Economy, 100(2), 223-251. [CrossRef].
- Chapsa, X. & Tsanana, E. & Katrakilidis, C. (2015). Growth and Convergence in the EU-15: More Evidence from the Cohesion Countries. Procedia Economics and Finance, 33, 55-63. [CrossRef].
- De la Fuente, A. (1997). The empirics of growth and convergence: A selective review. Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, 21(1), 23–73. [CrossRef].
- Dobrinsky, R. & Havlik, P. (2014). Economic Convergence and Structural Change: the Role of Transition and EU Accession. Research Report No. 395. The Vienna Institute for International Economic Studies. Available at: [Link].
- Duro, E. (2012). Speed of convergence. CEE and Western Balkans countries. International Journal of Scientific & Engineering Research, 3(4), 1-7. [Google Scholar].
- Eurostat (2020). Database. [Link].
- Grossman, G. M. & Helpman, E. (1994). Endogenous Innovation in the Theory of Growth. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 8(1), 23-44. [CrossRef].
- Islam, N. (2003). What Have We Learnt From the Convergence Debate? Journal of Economic Surveys, 17, 309-362. [CrossRef].
- Lucas, R. (1988). On the mechanics of economic development. Journal of Monetary Economics, Elsevier, 22(1), 3-42. [CrossRef].
- Marelli, E. P., Parisi, M. L. & Signorelli, M. (2019). Economic convergence in the EU and Eurozone. Journal of Economic Studies, 46(7), 1332-1344. [Google Scholar].
- Matkowski, Z., Próchniak, M., Rapacki, R. (2016). Real Income Convergence between Central Eastern and Western Europe: Past, Present, and Prospects. 33rd Centre for International Research on Economic Tendency Surveys Conference on Economic Tendency Surveys and Economic Policy (September 14 – September 17, 2016). Available from: [Link].
- Próchniak, M. (2011). Determinants of economic growth in Central and Eastern Europe: the global crisis perspective. Post-Communist Economies, 23(4), 449–468. [CrossRef].
- Rapacki, R. & Próchniak, M. (2019). EU membership and economic growth: empirical evidence for the CEE countries. European Journal of Comparative Economics, 16(1), 3-40. [Link].
- Romer, P. M. (1986). Increasing Returns and Long-run Growth, Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, 94(5), 1002-1037. [CrossRef].
- Romer, P. M. (1987). Growth Based on Increasing Returns Due to Specialization. American Economic Review, 77(2), 56-62. [Google Scholar].
- Romer, P. M. (1989). Human Capital and Growth: Theory and Evidence. NBER Working Paper No. w3173. Massachusetts: National Bureau of Economic Research. [CrossRef].
- Romer, P. M. (1990). Endogenous Technological Change. The Journal of Political Economy, 98 (5) Part 2: The Problem of Development: A Conference of the Institute for the Study of Free Enterprise Systems, S71-S102. [CrossRef].
- Solow, R. M. (1956). A Contribution to the Theory of Economic Growth. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 70(1), 65-94. [CrossRef].
- Stanišić, N. (2012). The effects of the economic crisis on income convergence in the European Union. Acta Oeconomica, 62(2), 161-182. [CrossRef].
- Swan, T. W. (1956). Economic growth and capital accumulation. Economic Record, 32 (2), 334–361. [CrossRef].
- Vojinović, B., Acharya, S., Próchniak, M. (2009). Convergence Analysis Among the Ten European Transition Economies. Hitotsubashi Journal of Economics, 50(2), 17-35. [CrossRef].
- World Bank (2020). Data. Available from: [Link].
|