Abstract

In this study, we examine how the 2008-2009 Global Crisis has affected the informal payments/gifts paid by retailers in Eastern Europe and Central Asia. We look at the overall incidence of bribes, the incidence of bribes in customs/imports, the incidence of bribes in courts, and the incidence of bribes in tax payments. We compare the crisis period to the post-crisis period and found that these firms believed that the incidence of bribes went down significantly after the crisis ended. When we differentiate the retailers with respect to size, structure, legal form, gender of the owners, gender of the top manager, and whether or not they held an international quality certification, we found that, the results hold for all classifications of retailers. When we go into more detail and examine the incidence of bribes in customs/imports, courts, and taxes/tax collection, we found that the respondents saw a significant drop in the incidence of bribes in all areas after the crisis ended. However, our results show that, for bribes in customs/imports, the results do not hold for some of the classifications (i.e. medium-sized and the largest small firms, the firms that are part of a larger firm, the shareholding firms trading in the market, the partnerships, and the firms with an internationally recognized quality certification). For bribes in courts, the results do not hold for the largest small firms and the partnerships. For bribes in taxes/tax collection, the results do not hold for the partnerships and the firms with a quality certification. Our findings are consistent with the low rankings of these countries in Transparency International’s annual Corruption Perception Index data. Our findings are also consistent with previous studies’ findings that document high-levels of corruption in developing (or less developed) nations.

Keywords: bribe, bribery, corruption, informal payment, gift, retailer, global crisis, financial crisis.

JEL Classification: E01, D72, D73.

Cite as: Kaya, H.D., Engkuchik, E.N.S. (2021). The Perception of Corruption Among Retailers in Central Asia and Eastern Europe During and After the 2008 Crisis. SocioEconomic Challenges, 5(2), 70-80. https://doi.org/10.21272/sec.5(2).70-80.2021

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License

References

1. Aidt, T. S. (2003). Economic analysis of corruption: A survey, The Economic Journal, 113(491), 632-652. Available at: [Link].
2. Anokhin, S., & Schulze, W. S. (2009). Entrepreneurship, innovation, and corruption, Journal of Business Venturing, 24(5), 465-476. Available at: [Link].
3. Bardhan, P. (1997). Corruption and development: a review of issues, Journal of Economic Literature, 35(3), 1320-1346. Available at: [Google Scolar], [Link].
4. Drury, A. C., Krieckhaus, J., and Lusztig, M. (2006). Corruption, democracy, and economic growth, International Political Science Review, 27(2), 121-136. Available at: [Google Scholar], [Link].
5. Glaeser, E. L., & Saks, R. E. (2006). Corruption in America, Journal of Public Economics, 90(6), 1053-1072. Available at: [Google Scholar], [Link].
6. Gould, D. J., & Amaro-Reyes, J. A. (1983). The effects of corruption on administrative performance. World Bank Staff Working Paper No. 580, Available at: [Link].
7. Henderson, J. V., & Kuncoro, A. (2004). Corruption in Indonesia, NBER Working Paper 10674, National Bureau of Economic Research. Available at: [Link].
8. Jain, A. K. (2001). Corruption: A review. Journal of Economic Surveys, 15(1), 71-121. [CrossRef].
9. Kapur, D., and Vaishnav, M. (2013). Quid pro quo: Builders, politicians, and election finance in India. Kapur, Devesh and Vaishnav, Milan, Quid Pro Quo: Builders, Politicians, and Election Finance in India, Center for Global Development Working Paper No. 276. [CrossRef].
10. Kronenberg, T. (2004). The curse of natural resources in the transition economies. Economics of Transition, 12(3), 399-426. Available at: [Google Scholar], [Link].
11. Leite, C., and Weidmann, J. (1999). Does mother nature corrupt? Natural resources, corruption, and economic growth, IMF Working Paper No. 99/85. Available at: [Link].
12. Mauro, P. (1998). Corruption: causes, consequences, and agenda for further research, Finance and Development, 35(1), 11-14. Available at: [Google Scholar], [Link].
13. Mbaku, J. M. (1996). Bureaucratic corruption in Africa: The futility of cleanups, The Cato Journal, 16(1), 99-118. Available at: [Link].
14. Ngunjiri, I. (2010). Corruption and entrepreneurship in Kenya. Journal of Language, Technology & Entrepreneurship in Africa, 2(1), 93-106. Available at: [Google Scholar], [Link].
15. Osei-Tutu, E., Badu, E., and Owusu-Manu, D. (2010). Exploring corruption practices in public procurement of infrastructural projects in Ghana, International Journal of Managing Projects in Business, 3(2), 236-256. [CrossRef].
16. Pellegrini, L. (2011). Economic analysis of corruption. In Corruption, Development and the Environment, Netherlands: Springer, 13-27. [CrossRef].
17. Safavian, M. S., Graham, D. H., & Gonzalez-Vega, C. (2001). Corruption and microenterprises in Russia, World Development, 29(7), 1215-1224. Available at: [Google Scholar], [Link].
18. Svensson, J. (2005). Eight questions about corruption. The Journal of Economic Perspectives, 19(3), 19-42.. [CrossRef].
19. Tanzi, V., and Davoodi, H.R. (1997). Corruption, Public Investment, and Growth, IMF Working Paper No. 97/139. Available at: [Google Scholar], [Link].
20. Tonoyan, V., Strohmeyer, R., Habib, M., & Perlitz, M. (2010). Corruption and entrepreneurship: How formal and informal institutions shape small firm behavior in transition and mature market economies, Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 34(5), 803-831. [CrossRef].