Master’s Degree in Economy. Lead Researcher, First Author. ReacciónEconómica Social Innovation Think Tank CEO, IAOIP Director for Europe. ISO TC 279 and 307 Expert. Team-Leader at Blockhub.eu. Audit. Spain
PhD in Management, Invited Lecturer, ISCTE, Lisboa, Portugal
Invited Lecturer, Economist Research, Vice-president, ReacciónEconómica Communication and Reporting, Project Manager at Blockhub.eu, Spain
In an increasingly digitized world and after the disruption of the covid-19 pandemic, the internet and social networks are becoming the central backbone of interactions between individuals, organizations, and governments worldwide in general and defending the democratic values in Ukraine in particular. The influence capacity of social networks on creativity and innovation has grown in recent years and has been an objective of the study. This paper analyses the interaction between innovation and social networks from a balanced assessment, considering opportunities and risks. The interaction between social networks and innovation could redesign the value creation process. The proliferation of social media platforms coincides with the expansion of the open innovation paradigm and has demonstrated its efficiency in facilitating solutions in different fields such as science, statistics, engineering, production and the generation of social policies. On the other hand, risks have to be analyzed and mitigated. The social networks and search engines could have become a proxy for organizing and accessing information and knowledge on a large scale; however, evidence points out how the fake data and concentration could suffocate innovation. The research develops a theoretical framework to analyze how the organizational structure of social networks could influence the knowledge absorption capability and innovation; what is the influence of the social networks on creativity and innovation; and their role as drivers to create the social value. The results of the research could be practically valuable for many stakeholders: Chief Innovation Officers and Communication Managers, Teams responsible for Stakeholders Engagement and Open Innovation programmes, Policy Makers, and the Scientific Community interested in developing empirical research on the topic, as well as citizens to understand their role as change-makers contributing to developing Innovation and Creativity.
Keywords: innovation, creativity, social networks, social media, open innovation, social value, blockchain, artificial intelligence.
JEL Classification: O33, O3, L82, M31.
Cite as: Lopez, B.S., Caetano, I.M.S., Alcaide, A.V. (2022). Innovation And Social Networks For Creating Social Value. SocioEconomic Challenges, 6(2), 94-105. https://doi.org/10.21272/sec.6(2).94-105.2022
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
- Aral. S et al. (2021). The Social Media Submit, MIT report. [Link].
- Baran (1963). Paul Baran and the Origin of the Internet. [Link].
- CAPSSI (2022). [Link].
- Ciribeli & Paiva (2011). Networks and social media on the internet: realities and perspectives of a connected world. [Link].
- Froehlich (2020). What’s the difference between social media and social networking? [Link].
- Gilster (1997). Digital Literacy. New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons, Inc. ISBN: 978-0-471-16520-0. [Link].
- Hitchen et al. (2017). Social media: Open innovation in SMEs finds new support. Journal of Business Strategy, 38(3), 21-29. [Link].
- ISO, Innovation Management, Innovation Management System Guidance (2019). [Link].
- Kazadi, K. et al. (2015). Stakeholder co-creation during the innovation process: Identifying capabilities for knowledge creation among multiple stakeholders. Business Research Journal, 69(2), 525-540. [CrossRef].
- Kava et al. (2017). Innovation and Digital Social Networks: Mapping Publications Using Co-Citation Analysis. Brazilian Journal of Information Studies: Research trends, 14(4), set.-dez. 2020, e020013. [Link].
- Manski (2017). Building the blockchain world: Technological commonwealth or just more of the same? Briefing in Entrepreneurial Finance journal, 26(5), 511-522. [CrossRef].
- Manucciet al. (2015). From Creativity to Innovation: The Social Network Drivers of the Four Phases of the Idea Journey. The Academy and Management Review journal, 42(1), 53-79. [CrossRef].
- Mascia et al. (2012). Organizing Ideation, Creativity and Innovation: The Role of Social Networks. [CrossRef]. [Link].
- Montanari & Saberi (2010). The spread of innovations in social networks. PNAX Journal, 107(47), 1-6. [CrossRef].
- Phills et al. (2008). Rediscovering Social Innovation. Standford Social Innovation Review. [Link].
- Recuero (2009). Social networks on the internet, dissemination of information and journalism: elements for discussion. Journalistic Metamorphoses journal, 2, 1-269. [Link].
- Richey et al. (2016). Exploring situationally inappropriate social media posts: An impression management perspective. Information Technology & People, 29(3), 597-617. [CrossRef].
- Ritala et al. (2020). Innovation management research methods: embracing rigour and diversity. R&D Management journal, 50(3), 297-308. [CrossRef].
- Roberts et al, 2016. Finding the right role for social media in innovation. MIT Sloan Management Review journal, 57(3), 8-14. [Link].
- Sarmah et al. (2018). Social media and co-creative service innovation: an empirical study. Online Information Review journal, 2(7), 1146-1179. [CrossRef].
- Suarezet al. (2019). Blockchain Technology Facing Socioeconomic Challenges. Promise versus Probability. SocioEconomic Challenges, 3(4), 13-24. [CrossRef].
- Suarez & Vargas (2020). Blockchain, AI and IoT to Improve Governance, Financial Management and Control of Crisis: Case Study COVID-19. SocioEconomic Challenges, 4(2), 78-90. [CrossRef].
- The Open Innovation Barometer (2022). Economist Impact. [Link].
- Tsimonis & Dimitriadis (2014). Brand strategies in social media. Marketing Intelligence & Planning journal, 32(3), 328-344. [CrossRef].