Abstract

In this study, we focus on how regulations and taxes affect manufacturing firms in Eastern Europe and Central Asia. We examine whether overall regulations became a bigger obstacle to these firms after the 2008-2009 Global crisis. We also examine whether tax inspections became a bigger obstacle after the Global crisis. Besides regulations and tax inspections, we also look into the prevalence of corruption related to tax officials before and after the Global crisis. Using two large datasets (i.e. the BEEPS IV and BEEPS V surveys), we are able to compare the pre-crisis period to the post-crisis period. Our results show that, in this region, post-crisis, senior managers spent more time on dealing with overall regulations which includes tax-related regulations and other types of regulations. Therefore, we can conclude that, post-crisis, regulations became a bigger obstacle to manufacturing firms’ operations. We also find that, post-crisis, there was a significant drop in the percentage of firms that had inspections or meetings with tax officials. Also, post-crisis, each firm on average, had fewer inspections or meetings with tax officials. Therefore, while overall regulations became a bigger obstacle to these firms, tax inspections became a smaller problem. When we examine corruption, we find that there was no significant change in the prevalence of bribes related to tax officials. Before and after the Global crisis, a similar percentage (8-9%) of manufacturing firms had to deal with bribe requests by tax officials. Future studies may focus on other types of regulations which include employment regulations, health and safety regulations, licensing regulations, environmental regulations, and zoning regulations, and the corruption related to these regulations.

Keywords: corruption, bribery, regulations, small firm, small business, entrepreneurship, BEEPS.

JEL Classification: L26, L25, G38.

Cite as: Kaya, H.D. (2022). The global crisis, manufacturing firms, regulations and taxes. SocioEconomic Challenges, 6(4), 1-7. https://doi.org/10.21272/sec.6(4).1-7.2022

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License

References

1. Acs, Zoltan J., Pontus Braunerhjelm, David B. Audretsch, and Bo Carlsson (2009). The knowledge spillover theory of entrepreneurship, Small business economics, 32(1), 15-30. [Link].
2. Acs, Zoltan J., and Laszlo Szerb (2007). Entrepreneurship, economic growth and public policy, Small business economics, 28(2-3), 109-122. [Link].
3. Aidis, Ruta, Saul Estrin, and Tomasz Mickiewicz (2008). Institutions and entrepreneurship development in Russia: A comparative perspective, Journal of Business Venturing, 23(6), 656-672. [Link].
4. Aidis, Ruta, Friederike Welter, David Smallbone, and Nina Isakova (2007). Female entrepreneurship in transition economies: the case of Lithuania and Ukraine, Feminist Economics, 13(2), 157-183. [Link].
5. Bergmann, Heiko, and Rolf Sternberg (2007). The changing face of entrepreneurship in Germany.  Small Business Economics, 2007, 28(2), 205-221. [Link].
6. Bitzenis, Aristidis, and Ersanja Nito (2005). Obstacles to entrepreneurship in a transition business environment: the case of Albania, Journal of Small Business and Enterprise Development, 12(4), 564-578. [Link].
7. Branstetter, Lee, Francisco Lima, Lowell J. Taylor, and Ana Venâncio (2014). Do entry regulations deter entrepreneurship and job creation? Evidence from recent reforms in Portugal, The Economic Journal, 124(577), 805-832. [Link].
8. Bock, Bettina B. (2004). Fitting in and multi‐tasking: Dutch farm women’s strategies in rural entrepreneurship. Sociologia ruralis, 44(3), 245-260. [CrossRef].
9. Dreher, Axel, and Martin Gassebner (2013). Greasing the wheels? The impact of regulations and corruption on firm entry,” Public Choice, 155(3-4), 413-432. [Link].
10. García-Posada, Miguel, and Juan S. Mora-Sanguinetti (2015). Entrepreneurship and enforcement institutions: Disaggregated evidence for Spain, European Journal of Law and Economics, 1-26. [Link].
11. Gartner, William B., and Scott A. Shane (2014). Measuring entrepreneurship over time, Regional Studies, 48(6), 1071-1089. [Link].
12. Ghani, Ejaz, William R. Kerr, and Stephen O’Connell (2014). Spatial determinants of entrepreneurship in India, Regional Studies, 48(6), 1071-1089. [Link].
13. Klapper, Leora, Luc Laeven, and Raghuram Rajan (2006). Entry regulation as a barrier to entrepreneurship, Journal of Financial Economics, 82(3), 591-629. [Link].
14. Kreft, Steven F., and Russell S. Sobel. (2005). Public policy, entrepreneurship, and economic freedom,” Cato Journal, 25, 595. [Link].
15. Lee, L. W. (1991). Entrepreneurship and regulation: dynamics and political economy,” Journal of Evolutionary Economics, 1(3), 219-235. [Link].
16. Manolova, Tatiana S., Rangamohan V. Eunni, and Bojidar S. Gyoshev (2008). Institutional environments for entrepreneurship: Evidence from emerging economies in Eastern Europe, Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 32(1), 203-218. [Link].
17. Nawaser, Khaled, Seyed Mohammad Sadeq Khaksar, Fatemeh Shaksian, and Asghar Afshar Jahanshahi (2011). Motivational and legal barriers of entrepreneurship development, International Journal of Business and Management, 6(11), 112. [Link].
18. Nyström, Kristina (2008). The institutions of economic freedom and entrepreneurship: evidence from panel data, Public Choice, 136(3-4), 269-282. [Link].
19. Ovaska, Tomi, and Russell S. Sobel (2005). Entrepreneurship in post-socialist economies, Journal of Private Enterprise, 21(1), 8-28. [Link].
20. Parker, Simon C. (2007). Law and the Economics of Entrepreneurship,” Comparative Labor Law & Policy Journal, 28(4). [Link].
21. Smallbone, David, Friederike Welter, Artem Voytovich, and Igor Egorov (2010). Government and entrepreneurship in transition economies: the case of small firms in business services in Ukraine, The service industries Journal, 30(5), 655-670. [Link].
22. Sobel, Russell S., J. R. Clark, and Dwight R. Lee (2007). Freedom, barriers to entry, entrepreneurship, and economic progress, The Review of Austrian Economics, 20(4), 221-236. [Link].
23. Stephan, Ute, and Lorraine M. Uhlaner (2010). Performance-based vs socially supportive culture: A cross-national study of descriptive norms and entrepreneurship, Journal of International Business Studies, 41(8), 1347-1364. [Link].
24. Stephen, Frank, David Urbano, and Stefan Van Hemmen (2009). The responsiveness of entrepreneurs to working time regulations,” Small Business Economics, 32(3), 259-276. [Link].
25. Valdez, Michael E., and James Richardson (2013). Institutional Determinants of Macro‐Level Entrepreneurship, Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 37(5), 1149-1175. [Link].
26. Van Stel, Andre, David J. Storey, and A. Roy Thurik (2007). The effect of business regulations on nascent and young business entrepreneurship, Small Business Economics, 28(2-3), 171-186. [Link].
27. Welter, Friederike (2004). The environment for female entrepreneurship in Germany (2004). Journal of Small Business and Enterprise Development, 11(2), 212-221. [Link].
28. Wennekers, Sander, and Roy Thurik (1999). Linking entrepreneurship and economic growth,” Small business economics, 13(1), 27-56. [Link].
29. Wilhelm, Paul G. (2002). International validation of the corruption perceptions index: Implications for business ethics and entrepreneurship education. Journal of Business Ethics, 35(3), 177-189. [Link].
30. Zahra, Shaker A., and Dennis M. Garvis (2000). International corporate entrepreneurship and firm performance: The moderating effect of international environmental hostility. Journal of business venturing, 15(5-6), 469-492. [Link].