Abstract

Knowledge is a strategic, high-quality source of power. Knowledge assets – technological and human capital – have been recognized as key resource for sustaining competitive advantage in a dynamic turbulent environment. Past research argued that knowledge is important to facilitate and leverage knowledge assets. Most of the firm’s knowledge and skills reside in its human capital, often in tacit and explicit knowledge. Existing knowledge is not enough to be competitive on the future market. Firms must collect, disseminate and create knowledge capital. According to the theory of dynamic organization knowledge creation (SECI; processes of socialization, externalization, combination and internalization), knowledge assets are the key elements that facilitate knowledge creation processes. Knowledge can be created on personal / organizational level, and also externally, such as with customers, partners and suppliers. Nonaka, Toyama and Konno (2005) identified four dimensions of construct of organizational knowledge capital: experimental knowledge assets, conceptual knowledge assets, routine knowledge assets and system knowledge assets. Each form of knowledge has specific individual support in process of knowledge creation. The firms needs vision and synchronized entire team. This paper employed a survey instrument and collected data in Slovenia. Our research confirmed Nonaka, Toyama and Konno (2005) research, we confirmed all four dimensions of organizational knowledge capital. Total 195 responses were analysed. The study shows importance to create learning environment, networking between professionals, to build trust encourage open, share / disseminate knowledge and create new knowledge.

Keywords: small and medium sized business (SMEs), competitiveness, knowledge capital, knowledge creation.

JEL Classification: A290.

Cite as: Vidic, F. (2022). Knowledge asset as competitive resource. SocioEconomic Challenges, 6(4), 8-20. https://doi.org/10.21272/sec.6(4).8-20.2022

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License

References

1. Autio, E., Sapienza, H. J. and Almeida, J. G. (2000). Effects of age at entry, knowledge intensity, and immutability on international growth. Academy of management journal, 43, 909–924. [CrossRef].
2. Barney J. (1991). Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. Journal of Management, 17, 99-120. [CrossRef].
3. Becerra-Fernandez, I. and Sabherwal, R. (2003). Organizational knowledge management: contingency perspective. Journal of management information systems, 18(1), 35-55. [Link].
4. Chou and Chang (2006). A contingency model of knowledge creation. The tenth Pacific Asia conference on information systems (PACIS 2006). [Link].
5. Chou, S. W. and He, M. Y. (2004). Knowledge management: the distinctive role of knowledge assets in facilitating knowledge creation. Journal of information science, 30(2), 146-159. [Link].
6. Coleman, J.S. (1988). Sociological and economic approaches to the analysis of social structure. The American journal of sociology, 94, 95-120. [CrossRef].
7. Cyert, R. M., Kumar, P. and Williams, J. R. (1993). Information, market imperfections and strategy. Strategic management journal, 47-58. [CrossRef].
8. Davenport, T., and Marchand, D. (1999). Is KM just good information management? Data, information and knowledge are points along a continuum. Retrieved from [Link].
9. Davenport, T. and Prusak, L. (1998). Know what you know. CIO, 11(9), 58-63. [Link].
10. De Castro, G. M., López-Sáez, P. and Navas-López. J. E. (2008). Organisational learning dynamics in the software publishing industry. IJTM, 41(1/2), 138-154. [Link].
11. Dess, G. G. and Lumpkin, G. T. (2001). Emerging issues in strategy process research. In M. A. Hitt, R. E. Freeman and J. S. Harrison (Eds.). Handbook of strategic management, 3–34. Oxford: Blackwell Publishers. [CrossRef].
12. Dess, G. G., and Picken, J. C. (1999). Beyond productivity: How leading companies achieve superior performance by leveraging their human capital. New York: AMACOM. [Link].
13. Dierickx, I., Cool, K. (1989). Asset stock accumulation and sustainable of competitive advantage. Management science, 35, 1504-1513. [CrossRef].
14. Dillman, D. A. (2000). Mail and internet surveys: the tailored design method. 2nd edition. New York; Chichester: John Wiley, 2000. [CrossRef].
15. Drucker, P. F. (1994). The theory of the business. Harvard business school, 96-104. [Link].
16. Drucker, P. F. (2009). A century of social transformation: emergence of knowledge society. In Managing in a time of great change. Boston: Harvard business press, 177-230. [CrossRef].
17. Grant, R. M. (1996). Grant, toward a knowledge-based theory of the firm. Strategic management journal, 17, 93-107. [CrossRef].
18. Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J. and Anderson, R. E. (2010). Multivariate data analysis (7th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NY:  Pearson-Prentice Hall publisher. [Link].
19. Handa, P., Pagani, J., Bedford, D. (2019). Knowledge assets and knowledge audits, Emerald publising. [Link].
20. Hitt, M. A., Bierman, L., Shimizu, K. and Kochhar, R. (2001). Direct and moderating effects of human capital on strategy and performance in professional service firms: A resource-based perspective. Academy of Management Journal, 44, 13–28. [CrossRef].
21. Hitt, M. A.  and Ireland, R. D. (2002). The essence of strategic leadership: Managing human and social capital. Journal of leadership and organization studies, 9(1), 3–14. [CrossRef].
22. Huggins, R. and Izushi, H. (2007). Competing for knowledge. Creating, connecting and growing. Routledge studies in global competition. [CrossRef].
23. Ireland, R. D., Hitt, M. A. and Sirmon, D.G. (2003). A model of strategic entrepreneurship: the construct and its dimensions. Journal of management. 29(6), 963-989. [CrossRef].
24. Korposch, D., Lee, Y.C., Wei, C.C. and Wei, C.S. (2011). Modeling the effects of existing knowledge on the creation of new knowledges. Concurent engeneering, 19(3), 225-234. [CrossRef].
25. Kusonoki, K., Nonaka, I. and Nagata, A. (1998). Organizational capabilities in product development of Japanese firms: a conceptual framework and empirical findings. Organizational science, 9(6), 699-718. [CrossRef].
26. Lane, P.J., Lubatkin, N. (1998). Relative absorptive capacity and interorganizational learning. Strategic management journal, 19, 461-477. [CrossRef].
27. Li, Y. H., Huang, J. W. and Tsai, M. T. (2009). Entrepreneurial orientation and firm performance: the role of knowledge creation process. Industrial marketing management, 38, 440-449. [Link].
28. Lockett, A., Thompson, S. and Morgenstern, U. (2009). The development of the resource-based view of the firm: a critical appraisal. International journal of management reviews, 10(1), 9-28. [CrossRef].
29. Matusik, S. F. and Hill, C. W. L. (1998). The utilization of contingent work, knowledge creation and competitive advantage. Academy of management review, 23(1), 680-697. [Link].
30. Miller, K. D. (2002). Knowledge inventories and managerial myotopia. Strategic management journal, 23, 689-706. [CrossRef].
31. Miller, D. and Shamsie, J. (1996). The resource-based view of the firm in two environments: The Hollywood film studios from 1936 to 1965. Academy of management journal, 39, 519–543. [CrossRef].
32. Nonaka, I. (1994). A dynamic theory of organizational knowledge creation. Organization science, 5(1), 14-37. [Link].
33. Nonaka, I. (1991). The knowledge-creating company. Harvard business review, 69, 96-105. [CrossRef].
34. Nonaka, I. and Takeuchi, H. (1995). The knowledge-creating company. [Link].
35. Nonaka, I, Toyama, R., Konno (2005). SECI, Ba and Leadership: A unified model of dynamic knowledge creation in Little, S., Ray, T. Managing knowledge. SAGE. [CrossRef].
36. Nonaka, I., Toyama, R. and Nagata A. (2000). A firm as a knowledge-creating entity: a new perspective on the theory of the firm. Oxford university press, Industrial and corporate change, 9(1), 1-20. [CrossRef].
37. Paci, R. Marrocu, E. (2013). Knowledge assets and regional growth performance. Growth and change, a journal for urban and regional policy, 4(2), 229-257. [CrossRef].
38. Handa, P., Pagani, J. and Bedford, D. (2019). Assigning Value to Knowledge Assets, Knowledge Assets and Knowledge Audits (Working Methods for Knowledge Management), Emerald Publishing Limited, Bingley, pp. 201-217. [Crossref].
39. Penrose, E., (1959). Limits to the Growth and Size of Firms. Papers and proceedings of the Sixty-seventh annual meeting of the American economic association. (May, 1955), The American economic review, 45(2), 531-543. [Link].
40. Polanyi, M. (1966). The tacit dimension. Routledge and Kegan Paul. [Link].
41. Priem, R. L., and Butler, J. E. (2001). Is the resource-based “view” a useful perspective for strategic management research? Academy of management review, 26, 22–40. [CrossRef].
42. Thornhill, S. (2006). Knowledge, innovation and firm performance in high- and low-technology regimes. Journal of business venturing, 21, 687-703. [CrossRef].
43. Toffer, A. (1991). Powershift: knowledge, wealth and power at the edge of the 21st century. New York: Bantam. [CrossRef].
44. Scot, S. and Venkataraman, S. (2000). The promise of entrepreneurship as a field of research. Academy of management review, 25(1), 217-226. [Link].
45. Senoo, D., Magnier-Watanabe, R. and Salmador, M. P. (2007). Workplace reformation, active ba and knowledge creation. From conceptual to a practical framework. European journal of management, 10(3), 296-315. [Link].