Розширена анотація українською мовою

Стаття присвячена дослідженню прихованих фінансових збитків, спричинених збоями в ланцюгах поставок. Систематизація літературних джерел та підходів до вирішення проблеми ефективної організації транснаціональних ланцюгів поставок автомобілів та їх комплектуючих засвідчила, що дане питання наразі досі недостатньо вивчено та розроблено, і тому потребує пошуку нових підходів до забезпечення належного функціонування автомобільної промисловості. Основна мета проведеного дослідження полягає у побудові комплексної системи оцінювання ймовірних збитків із-за порушень схем поставок у галузі автомобілебудування Великобританії. Досліджуване питання в статті розкривається в наступній логічній послідовності: проведено огляд літератури щодо існуючих зв’язків між ланцюгами поставок у Великобританії; визначено ризики, загрози та можливості розвитку автомобільної промисловості у Великобританії з урахуванням виходу країни з Європейського Союзу; проаналізовано вплив Brexit на експортну конкурентоспроможність країни. Для проведеного дослідження використано глобальні бази даних торгівлі доданою вартістю (TiVA) та «витрати – випуск» (WIOD). Розраховано комплекс мережевих індикаторів, а також запропоновано узагальнюючий показник (PageRank), що враховує ймовірність того, що торгові потоки будуть проходити через країну. У рамках дослідження зроблено висновок, що автомобільна галузь промисловості Великобританії тісно інтегрована в торгівельну логістику країн ЄС. Запропоновано заходи щодо підтримки торгівлі автомобілями за рахунок удосконалення механізму відшкодування митних платежів. Водночас ефект від даних заходів є меншим порівняно з переваги безмитного доступу товарів, що є основними рисами єдиного ринку торгівлі серед країн ЄС. Це доводить, що для подальшого розвитку автомобільної галузі у Великобританії необхідно трансформувати механізми ланцюгів поставок, і в перспективі змінити спосіб прийняття рішень стосовно місць розташування виробничих потужностей.

Ключові слова: Brexit, глобальні ланцюги цінностей, зв’язки, глобальна база даних «витрати – випуск» (World Input-Output Database, або WIOD).

Класифікація JEL: F13, F10, F47, F62.

Цитувати як: Escaith, H., Khorana, S., Kerr, W.A. (2020). The Hidden Cost of Supply Chain Disruptions: Case Study of the UK’s Automotive Sector. SocioEconomic Challenges, 4(3), 5-19. https://doi.org/10.21272/sec.4(3).5-19.2020

Ця стаття публікуються за ліцензією Creative Commons Attribution International License

Список використаних джерел

1. ACEA (2019). European Automobile Manufacturers Association. Available at: https://www.acea.be/uploads/news_documents/Brexit-facts_figures_March_2019.pdf.
2. Acemoglu, D., V.M. Carvalho, A. Ozdaglar and A. Tahbaz-Salehi (2012). The Network Origins of Aggregate Fluctuations, Econometrica, 80 (5), 1977-2016. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3982/ECTA9623.
3. Ahmad, N. (2019). Improving the accounting frameworks for analyses of global value chains, in Global Value Chain Report 2019: Technological Innovation, Supply Chain Trade, and Workers in a Globalized World, Chapter 8; WTO. Available at: https://www.oecd.org/dev/Global-Value-Chain-Development-Report-2019-Technological-Innovation-Supply-Chain-Trade-and-Workers-in-a-Globalized-World.pdf.
4. Ali, S. and U. Durdash (2011). The Rise of Trade in Intermediates: Policy Implications, International Economic Bulletin, Washington: Carnegie Endowment for International Peace, February. Available at: https://voxeu.org/article/rise-trade-intermediates-policy-implications.
5. Ali-Yrkkö, J. & Kuusi, T (2019). Brexit and Indirect Impact Routes through Global Value Chains. ETLA Report No 89. Available at: https://pub.etla.fi/ETLARaportit-Reports-89.pdf.
6. Antràs, P and A. de Gortari (2018). On the Geography of Global Value Chains, manuscript Cambridge: Harvard University. Available at: https://scholar.harvard.edu/files/antras/files/conceptual_aspects_gvcs.pdf.
7. Baldwin, R. (2006). Globalisation: The Great Unbundling(s). Helsinki, Finland: The Economic Council of Finland, Prime Minister’s Office. Available at: https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/ac4f/a1e76d01d9f7c9f991b352abdb60d2a15e4f.pdf.
8. Baldwin, R. (2012). Global Supply Chains: Why They Emerged, Why They Matter, and Where They are Going, CEPR Discussion Papers, no. 9103, London: Centre for Economic Policy Research. Available at: https://econpapers.repec.org/paper/cprceprdp/9103.htm.
9. Baldwin, R. and S. Evenett (2020). COVID-19 and Trade policy: Why Turning Inward won’t work? VOX-CEPR Policy portal. Available at: https://voxeu.org/content/covid-19-and-trade-policy-why-turning-inward-won-t-work.
10. Baldwin, R.E. and J. Lopez-Gonzalez (2013). Supply-Chain Trade: A Portrait of Global Patterns and Several Testable Hypotheses, NBER Working Paper 18957, Cambridge: National Bureau of Economic Research. Available at: https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2251702.
11. Baldwin, R., and A. Venables (2010). Spiders and Snakes: Offshoring and Agglomeration in the Global Economy, NBER Working Paper No. 16611, Cambridge: National Bureau of Economic Research. Available at: https://www.nber.org/papers/w16611.pdf.
12. Bailey, D and L. Propris De (2017), Brexit and the UK Automotive Industry, National Institute of Economic Review, 242 (1), 51-59. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/002795011724200114.
13. Bigsten, A., P. Collier, S. Dercon, M. Fafchamps, B. Gauthier, J. W. Gunning, A. Oduro, R. Oostendorp, C. Patillo, M. Soderbom, F. Teal, and A. Zeufack (2000). Contract Flexibility and Dispute Resolution in African Manufacturing, Journal of Development Studies, 36 (4), 1-17. DOI: 10.1080/00220380008422635.
14. Blanchard, E.J., C.P. Bown and R.C. Johnson (2016). Global Supply Chains and Trade Policy, Technical report, Cambridge: National Bureau of Economic Research. Available at: https://site.stanford.edu/sites/g/files/sbiybj8706/f/bbj-june2016.pdf.
15. Borchert, I. and N. Tamberi (2018). Brexit and Regional Services Exports: A Heat Map Approach. UKTPO Briefing Paper 14, UK Trade Policy Observatory, Brighton: University of Sussex. Available at: https://blogs.sussex.ac.uk/uktpo/files/2018/01/Briefing-paper-14-Heatmap-final.pdf.
16. Borgatti, S.P. (2005). Centrality and Network Flow. Social Networks, 27 (1), 55-71. Available at: http://www.analytictech.com/borgatti/papers/centflow.pdf.
17. Brakman, S., H. Garretsen and T. Kohl (2018). Consequences of Brexit and Options for a ‘Global Britain’, Papers in Regional Science, 97, 55–72. Available at: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111/pirs.12343
18. Cappariello, R. (2017). Brexit: Estimating Tariff Costs for EU Countries in a New Trade Regime with the UK, Occasional Paper 381, Rome: Banca d’Italia. Available at: https://ideas.repec.org/p/bdi/opques/qef_381_17.html.
19. Cappariello, R., Damjanovic, M., Mancini, M. and Vergara Caffarelli, F. (2018). EU-UK Global Value Chain Trade and the Indirect Costs of Brexit (November 6). Bank of Italy. Available at: http://www.bancaditalia.it/pubblicazioni/qef/2018-0468/QEF_468_18.pdf.
20. Chen, W., B. Los, P. McCann, R. Ortega‐Argilés, M. Thissen and F. van Oort (2018). The Continental Divide? Economic Exposure to Brexit in Regions and Countries on Both Sides of The Channel’, Papers in Regional Science, 97(1), 25-54. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/pirs.12334.
21. Clarke, H.D., M.J. Goodwin, M. Goodwin and P. Whiteley (2017), Brexit, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316584408.
22. Coe, N.M. and Yeung, H.W.C. (2015). Global Production Networks: Theorizing Economic Development in an Interconnected World, Oxford: Oxford University. DOI: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198703907.001.0001.
23. Department for International Trade (2019). UK Trade in Numbers, February, Available at: https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/836787/190924_UK_trade_in_numbers_full_web_version_final.pdf.
24. Dhingra, S., H. Huang, G. Ottaviano, J. Paulo Pessoa, T. Sampson, and J. Van Reenen (2017). The costs and benefits of leaving the EU: trade effects, Economic Policy, 32, 651–705. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/epolic/eix015.
25. Escaith, H (2014). ‘Mapping Global Value Chains and Measuring Trade in Tasks’, in Asia and Global Production Networks: Implications for Trade, Incomes and Economic Vulnerability, edited by B Ferrarini and D Hummels, Asian Development Bank (Manila) and Edward Elgar Publishing (Cheltenham and Northampton). Available at: https://www.adb.org/publications/asia-and-global-production-networks-implications-trade-incomes-and-economic-vulnerability.
26. Escaith, H. (2017). Accumulated Trade Costs and Their Impact on the Development of Domestic and International Value Chains. In Global Value Chain Development Report 2017: Measuring and Analyzing the Impact of GVCs on Economic Development, Washington: World Bank, IDE-JETRO, OECD, Research Center of Global Value Chains (UIBE) and the WTO, pp. 97-117. Available at: https://www.wto.org/english/res_e/booksp_e/gvcs_report_2017.pdf
27. Gasiorek, M., I. Serwicka and A. Smith (2019). Which Manufacturing Industries and Sectors are Most Vulnerable to Brexit?, World Economy, 42 (1), 21-56. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/twec.12757.
28. Gereffi, G., J. Humphrey and T. Sturgeon (2005) The Governance of Global Value Chains, Review of International Political Economy, 12: 78-104. DOI: 10.1080/09692290500049805.
29. Grossman, G.M. & Rossi-Hansberg, E. (2008). Trading tasks: A simple theory of offshoring, American Economic Review, 98(5): 1978–1997. DOI: 10.1257/aer.98.5.1978.
30. H M Government (2017). Building a Britain Fit for the Future, Industrial Strategy White Paper. Available at: https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/664563/industrial-strategy-white-paper-web-ready-version.pdf.
31. Hobbs, J.E. (1996). A Transaction Cost Approach to Supply Chain Management, Supply Chain Management, 1 (2), 15-27. Available at: https://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/13598549610155260/full/html?skipTracking=true.
32. Hummels, D., J. Ishii, and K-M. Yi (2001). The Nature and Growth of Vertical Specialization in World Trade, Journal of International Economics, 54 (1), 75–96. Available at: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022-1996(00)00093-3.
33. Ignatenko, A., Raei, F. and Mircheva, B. (2019). Global Value Chains: What are the Benefits and Why Do Countries Participate? IMF Working Paper No: WP/19/18. Available at: https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007%2F978-3-030-43189-1_3.
34. Ijtsma, P., P. Levell, B. Los and M.P. Timmer (2018). The UK’s Participation in Global Value Chains and Its Implications for Post‐Brexit Trade Policy. Fiscal Studies, 39 (4), 651-683. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-5890.12176.
35. Johnson, R., and G. Noguera (2012). Accounting for Intermediates: Production Sharing and Trade in Value Added, Journal of International Economics, 86, 224-236. DOI: 10.1016/j.jinteco.2011.10.003.
36. Kano, L., Tsang, E.W.K. & Yeung, H.W. (2020). Global value chains: A review of the multi-disciplinary literature, Journal of International Business Studies 51, 577–622. DOI: 10.1057/s41267-020-00304-opinion-files/9071.pdf.
37. Keane, J. (2014). Global Value Chain Analysis: What’s New, What’s Different, What’s Missing?, London: Overseas Development Institute, Available at: https://www.odi.org/sites/odi.org.uk/files/odi-assets/publications-.
38. Kee, H.L. and A. Nicita (2017). Short-Term Impact of Brexit on the United Kingdom’s Export of Goods, World Bank Policy Research Working Paper 8195, Washington: World Bank. Available at: https://documents.worldbank.org/en/publication/documents-reports/documentdetail/164821505330746382/short-term-impact-of-brexit-on-the-united-kingdoms-export-of-goods.
39. Koopman, R., Z. Wang, and S-J. Wei (2014). Tracing Value-Added and Double Counting in Gross Exports, American Economic Review, 104: 459-494. DOI: 10.1257/aer.104.2.459.
40. Lobao, J. and Santos, S. (2019). Stock Market Reaction to Brexit’s Announcements: Evidence from a Natural Experiment, Global Economy Journal, 19(3), 1950018.  DOI: https://doi.org/10.1142/S2194565919500180.
41. Milberg, W. and Winkler, D. (2013). Outsourcing Economics: Global Value Chains in Capitalist Development. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Available at: https://globalvaluechains.org/publication/outsourcing-economics-global-value-chains-capitalist-development.
42. Miroudot, S. (2016). Services in Global Value Chains: From Inputs to Value-Creating Activities, Trade Policy Paper, Paris: Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). DOI: 10.1787/465f0d8b-e.
43. Miroudot, S. D. Rouzet and F. Spinelli (2013). Trade Policy Implications of Global Value Chains: Case Studies, OECD paper TAD/TC/WP(2013)13. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1787/5k3tpt2t0zs1-en.
44. Nadvi, K. and R. Horner (2018). Global Value Chains and the Rise of the Global South: Unpacking Twenty-first Century Polycentric Trade, Global Networks, 18 (2), 207-237. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/glob.12180.
45. Nielson, J. (2014). Value Chains, Neoliberalism and Development Practice: The Indonesian Experience, Review of International Political Economy, 24 (1), 38-69. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09692290.2013.809782.
46. Nolan, P. and J. Zhang (2010). Global Competition After the Financial Crisis, New Left Review, 64, 97-108. Available at: https://newleftreview.org/issues/II64/articles/peter-nolan-jin-zhang-global-competition-after-the-financial-crisis.
47. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) (2013). ‘Mapping Value Chains,’ Working Party of the Trade Committee TAD/TC/WP/RD (2013), 3 December, The OECD Conference Centre, Paris. Available at: http://www.oecd.org/officialdocuments/publicdisplaydocumentpdf/?cote=TAD/TC/WP(2012)6/FINAL&docLanguage=En.
48. OECD (2016). The Economic Consequences of Brexit: A Taxing Decision,” Economic Policy Papers 16, OECD. Available at: https://www.oecd.org/unitedkingdom/The-Economic-consequences-of-Brexit-27-april-2016.pdf.
49. Portuese, A. (2018). Towards a Meta Cost-benefit Analysis: The Case of Brexit, Journal of International Law and Trade Policy 19 (1): 30-54. DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.276242.
50. Pisani, M. and F. V. Caffarelli (2018). What will Brexit mean for the British and euro-area economies? A model-based assessment of trade, Economic working paper: 1163, Bank of Italy, Directorate General for Economics, Statistics and Research. Available at: https://www.bancaditalia.it/pubblicazioni/temi-discussione/2018/2018-1163/index.html?com.dotmarketing.htmlpage.language=1.
51. Protts, J. (2016). Potential post-Brexit Tariff Costs for EU-UK trade, Civitas, 23 October, Available at: http://www.civitas.org.uk/content/files/potentialpostbrexittariffcostsforeuuktrade.pdf.
52. Rakita, B., Madić, V. and Marković, D. (2017). Competitive Strategies of Late Followers in Auto Industry: Case Study Hyundai-Kia. Industrija, 45(1), 121-146. Available at: chrome-extension://ohfgljdgelakfkefopgklcohadegdpjf/https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/0da5/5f2f065ae0fe1d20bd10f922a96a58e4d93d.pdf?_ga=2.105891780.636430942.1598807595-1201350362.1598807595.
53. Rojas-Romagosa, H. (2016). Trade effects of Brexit for the Netherlands, CPB Background Document June, CPB – Netherlands Bureau for Economic Policy Analysis. Available at: chrome-extension://ohfgljdgelakfkefopgklcohadegdpjf/https://www.cpb.nl/sites/default/files/omnidownload/CPB-Backgroud-Document-June-2016-Trade-effects-of-brexit-for-the-netherlands.pdf.
54. Ruddick, G. (2017). Hard Brexit ‘Could Increase Cost of Making a Car by £2,400’, The Guardian, 20 March, Available at: https://www.theguardian.com/business/2017/mar/20/hard-brexit-cost-car-uk-wto-rules.
55. Shende, V. (2014). Analysis of Research in Consumer Behavior of Automobile Passenger Car Customer. International Journal of Scientific and Research Publications, 4(3), 17-34. Available at: chrome-extension://ohfgljdgelakfkefopgklcohadegdpjf/http://www.ijsrp.org/research-paper-0214/ijsrp-p2670.pdf.
56. Timmer, M. P., A. Azeez Erumban, B. Los, R. Stehrer, and G. J. de Vries (2014). Slicing Up Global Value Chains, Journal of Economic Perspectives, 28 (2), 99–118. Available at: https://www.aeaweb.org/articles?id=10.1257/jep.28.2.99.
57. UN Conference on Trade and Development (UNCTAD) (2013). Implications of Global Value Chains for Trade, Investment, Development, and Jobs, UNCT. Available at: chrome-extension://ohfgljdgelakfkefopgklcohadegdpjf/https://unctad.org/en/PublicationsLibrary/unctad_oecd_wto_2013d1_en.pdf.
58. Vandenbussche, H, W. Connell and W. Simons (2017). Global Value Chains, Trade Shocks and Jobs: An Application to Brexit, CEPR Discussion paper 12303, London: Centre for Economic Policy Research. Available at: https://cepr.org/active/publications/discussion_papers/dp.php?dpno=12303.
59. World Bank; World Trade Organization (2019). Global Value Chain Development Report 2019: Technological Innovation, Supply Chain Trade, and Workers in a Globalized World, Washington, D.C.: World Bank Group. Available at: https://www.worldbank.org/en/topic/trade/publication/global-value-chain-development-report-2019.
60. World Bank (2020). World Development Report: 2020 Trading for Development in the Age of Global Value Chains, World Bank, Washington, DC. Available at: https://www.worldbank.org/en/publication/wdr2020.
61. WTO (2017). World Trade Report, 2017: Trade, Technology and Jobs, Geneva: World Trade Organization. Available at: chrome-extension://ohfgljdgelakfkefopgklcohadegdpjf/https://www.wto.org/english/res_e/booksp_e/world_trade_report17_e.pdf.
62. Wyman, O. (2016). The Impact of the UK’s Exit from the EU on the UK-based Financial Services Sector. Available at: chrome-extension://ohfgljdgelakfkefopgklcohadegdpjf/https://www.oliverwyman.com/content/dam/oliver-wyman/global/en/2016/oct/OW%20report_Brexit%20impact%20on%20Uk-based%20FS.pdf
63. Xu, J. and Liu, X. (2018). Technology is Changing What a Premium Brand Looks Like. Harvard Business Review, 96(5), 2-5. Available at: https://hbr.org/2018/05/technology-is-changing-what-a-premium-automotive-brand-looks-like.